Soft tissue changes with fixed functional appliances in class II division 1: A systematic review

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 712-720

  Flores Mir, Carlos ^a,b   Major, Michael P ^b,c   Major, Paul W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Cranio facial and Oral health Evidence based Practice Group   (Canada)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Facial changes; Functional appliances; Profile; Soft tissue

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744917866     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Vig KW, Weyant R, O'Brien K, Bennett E. Developing outcome measures in orthodontics that reflect patient and provider values. Semin Orthod. 1999;5:85-95.
2. Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent. 1997;9:76-85.
3. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970;40:284-318.
4. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:275-286.
5. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128-137.
6. Shen G, Hagg U, Darendeliler M. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005;8:2-10.
7. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:488-494.
8. Chalmers I, Altman DG. Systematic Reviews.London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1995.
9. Guyatt G, Rennie D. User's Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-based Clinical Practice. Chicago, Ill: AMA Press; 2002.
10. Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 1999;282:1054-1060.
11. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42-46.
12. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Boers M, van den Brandt PA. The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:651-654.
13. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:239-246.
14. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:140-152; quiz 254-145.
15. Ursi WJS, McNamara JJ, Martins DR, Ursi WJS. Evaluation of the soft tissue profile of Class II patients treated with cervical headgear, Frankel's FR-2 and the Herbst appliances. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortoped Facial. 2000;5:20-46.
16. Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Fulya I. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:426-436.
17. Schutz TCB, Vigorito JW, Dominguez-Rodriguez GC. A cephalometric evaluation of the skeletal and facial changes following the treatment with the Herbst appliance in adolescents with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion - Part I. Ortodontia. 2002;35:22-34.
18. Schutz TCB, Vigorito JW, Dominguez-Rodriguez GC. A cephalometric evaluation of the skeletal and facial changes following the treatment with the Herbst appliance in adolescents with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion - Part II. Ortodontia. 2003;36:44-61.
19. Soytarhan A, Isiksal E. Treatment of Angle Class II/1 malocclusions with the Herbst appliance. Turk Ortodonti Dergisi. 1990;3:94-101.
20. Eicke C, Wieslander L. Soft-tissue profile changes through therapy with the Herbst hinge appliance. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:149-153.
21. Blackwood HO 3rd. Clinical management of the Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:755-760.
22. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO 3rd. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:113-122.
23. Jasper JJ, McNamara JA Jr. The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:641-650.
24. Kucukkeles N, Orgun A. Correction of Class II malocclusions with a Jasper Jumper in growing patients. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17:445.
25. Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R. A cephalometric study of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:311-320.
26. Aelbers C, Dermaut L. Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality? Literature review. Revue Belge Medecine Dentaire. 1994;49:26-40.
27. White LW. Current Herbst appliance therapy. J Clin Orthod. 1994;28:296-309.
28. Snodgrass DJ. The modified Herbst appliance: a review of principles and a new technique for the 1990's. J Gen Orthod. 1995;6:17-23.
29. Aelbers CM, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I, Fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:513-519.
30. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 1997;3:232-243.
31. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:285-295.
32. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:209-218.
33. Schiavoni R, Grenga V, Macri V. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:393-409.
34. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:138-147.
35. Pancherz H, Anehuspancherz M. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:275.
36. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-442.
37. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-144.
38. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Petersson A. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the craniomandibular system with special reference to the TMJ. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:244-253.
39. Kasai K. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:674-684.
40. O'Neill K, Harkness M, Knight R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:371-376; discussion 377.
41. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:358-382.
42. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I - the hard tissues. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:501-516.
43. Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II - the soft tissues. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:663-684.
44. McDonagh S, Moss JP, Goodwin P, Lee RT. A prospective optical surface scanning and cephalometric assessment of the effect of functional appliances on the soft tissues. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:115-126.
45. Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent BH Jr, Powers M, Nelson S. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:423-430.
46. Falck F, Kobel EM. Changes in the soft tissue profile in treatment with function regulators. Fortsch Kieferorthop. 1985;46:407-415.