Beneath the surface of accountability: Answerability, responsibility and capacity-building in recent education reforms in Norway

Journal of Educational Change

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 113-138

  Hatch, Thomas ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Capacity; Educational policy; School improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875737496     PISSN: 13892843     EISSN: 15731812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-012-9206-1     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Accountability. (2011). In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://www. merriam-webster. com/dictionary/accountability.
2. Ahonen, S. (2001). The end of common school? Change in the ethos and politics of education in Finland towards the end of the 1990s. In S. Ahonen & L. Rantala (Eds.), Nordic lights: Education for nations and civic society in the Nordic countries, 1850-2000 (pp. 175-203). Helsinki: Tammer-Paino Oy.
3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Ball, S. J., Vincent, C., & Radnor, H. (1997). Into confusion: LEAs, accountability and democracy. Journal of Education Policy, 12(3), 147-164.
5. Boarini, R. (2009). Making the most of Norwegian schools. Economics Department working papers no. 661. Paris, France: OECD.
6. Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Christensen, T., & Peters, B. G. (1999). Structure, culture, and governance: A comparison of Norway and the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2006). Troubling images of teaching in no child left behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 668-697.
9. Cohen, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Pennsylvania, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
10. Corcoran, T., & Goertz, M. (1995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 27-31.
11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). No child left behind and high school reform. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 642-667.
12. Elmore, R. (2006). The problem of capacity in the (Re)Design of educational accountability systems. Paper presented at a symposium on NCLB and it's alternatives. Campaign for Educational Equity, New York, NY.
13. Elmore, R. F., Ablemann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: performance-based reform in education (pp. 65-98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14. Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 173-189.
15. Elstad, E., Nordtvedt, G., & Turmo, A. (2009). The Norwegian assessment system. An accountability perspective. CADMO, 17(1), 89-103.
16. Gregory, R. (2003). Accountability in modern government. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 557-568). London: Sage.
17. Hanushek, E. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance. Paris: OECD.
18. Harmon, M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. London: Sage.
19. Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators' participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114, 627-664.
20. Honig, M. I., Copland, M. A., Rainey, L., Lorton, J. A., & Newton, M. (2010). School district central office transformation for teaching and learning improvement. A report to the Wallace Foundation. Seattle, WA: The Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
21. Horner, L., Lekhi, R., & Blaug, R. (2006). Deliberative democracy and the role of public managers: Final report of The Work Foundation's public value consortium. London: Work Foundation. Retrieved on November 1, 2012 from http://www. theworkfoundation. com/DownloadPublication/Report/107_107_Deliberative%20democracy%20and%20the%20role%20of%20public%20managers. pdf.
22. Janssens, F. J., & de Wolf, I. F. (2009). Analyzing the assumptions of a policy program: An ex-ante evaluation of "educational governance" in the Netherlands. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 411-425.
23. Karlgren, I., & Klette, K. (2008). Reconstructions of Nordic teachers: Reform policies and teachers' work during the 1990s. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 117-133.
24. Kearns, K. P. (2003). Accountability in a seamless economics. In G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 581-589). London: Sage Publications.
25. Klette, K. (2002). Reform policy and teacher professionalism in four Nordic countries. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 265-282.
26. Koretz, D. (2008). The pending reauthorization of NCLB: An opportunity to rethink the basic strategy. In G. L. Sunderman (Ed.), Holding NCLB accountable: Achieving accountability, equity, and school reform (pp. 9-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27. Legatum Institute (2010). The 2010 Legatum Prosperity Index. Retrieved on March 20, 2011 from http://www. prosperity. com/country. aspx?id=NO.
28. Leithwood, K., & Earl, L. (2000). Educational accountability effects: An international perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(4), 1-18.
29. Lie, S., Caspersen, M., & Björnsson, J. K. (2004). Nasjonale prøver på prøve [National tests on test]. Oslo: University of Oslo.
30. Lie, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Ibsen, E., & Turmo, A. (2005). Nasjonale prøver på ny prøve [National tests on test again]. Oslo: University of Oslo.
31. Lysne, A. (2006). Assessment theory and practice of students' outcomes in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 327-359.
32. Malen, B., & King Rice, J. (2004). A framework for assessing the impact of education reforms on school capacity: Insights from studies of high-stakes accountability initiatives. Educational Policy, 18(5), 631-660.
33. McDonnell, L. (1994). Assessment policy as persuasion and regulation. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 394-420.
34. McDonnell, L., & Elmore, R. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-178.
35. Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement and why we may retain it anyway. Educational Researcher, 38, 353-364.
36. Møller, J., Prøitz T. S., & Aasen, P. (Ed.) (2009). Kunnskapsløftet-tung bør å bære? Underveisanalyse av styringsreformen i skjæringspunktet mellom politikk, administrasjon og profesjon. [Education and promotion-a heavy burden to bear? Analysis of the governance reforms in the intersection between politics, administration and professional]. Oslo, Norway: NIFU STEP.
37. Newmann, F., King, M., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259-299.
38. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2006). The education mirror 2005. Oslo: Author.
39. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2008). The education mirror 2007. Oslo: Author.
40. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2011). OECD review on evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes: Country background report for Norway. Oslo: Author.
41. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2001). The Development of Education 1991 to 2000: National Report from Norway. Retrieved on March 20, 2011 from http://www. regjeringen. no/en/dep/kd/Documents/Reports-and-actionplans/Reports/2001/The-Development-of-Education-1991-to-200/1. html?id=277458.
42. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2004). Competence for development: Competence development strategy in basic education 2005-2008. Oslo: Author.
43. Nusche, D., Earl, L., Maxwel, W., & Shewbridge, C. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Norway. Paris: OECD.
44. O'Day, J., Goertz, M., & Floden, R. (1995). Building capacity for education reform. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
45. OECD. (2006). Education at a glance. Paris: Author.
46. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345.
47. Price Waterhouse Coopers & The Norwegian Association of Local Authorities (KS). (2009). Come closer Oslo. Norway: The Norwegian Association of Local Authorities.
48. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Shuster.
49. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50. Romzek, B. S., & Ingraham, P. W. (2000). Cross pressures of accountability: Initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown plane crash. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 240-253.
51. Rothman, R. (1995). Measuring up: Standards, assessment, and school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Schön, D., & McDonald, J. (1998). Doing what you mean to do in school reform: Theory of action in the Annenberg challenge. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
53. Skedsmo, G. (2011). Formulation and realization of evaluation policy: Inconsistencies and problematic issues. Educational Assessment Evaluation & Accountability, 23, 5-20.
54. Spillane, J., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1-17.
55. Spillane, J., & Thompson, C. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185-203.
56. Statistics Norway. (2011). Facts about norway education 2011: Key figures 2009. Oslo: Author.
57. Stein, S. (2004). The culture of education policy. New York: Teachers College Press.
58. Stone, B. (1995). Administrative accountability in the "Westminster" democracies: Towards a new conceptual framework. Governance, 8(4), 505-526.
59. Supovitz, J. A. (2009). Can high stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2), 211-227.
60. Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 567-586.
61. Telhaug, A. O., Aasen, P., & Mediaas, O. A. (2004). From collectivism to individualism? Education as nation building in a Scandinavian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 141-158.
62. United Nations Human Development Program. (2010). Human Development Index 2010. Retreived on March 20, 2011 from http://hdr. undp. org/en/statistics/.
63. Verhoest, K. (2005). The impact of contractualization on control and accountability in government-agency relations: The case of Flanders (Belgium). In: G. Drewry, C. Grieve, & T. Tanquerel (Eds.) Contracts, performance and accountability (pp. 135-156). EGPA/IOS.
64. Volkmar, N. (2008). Knowledge and Solidarity: The Norwegian social-democratic school project in a period of change, 1945-2000. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
65. Watson, G. (2001). Reason and responsibility. Ethics, 111, 374-394.
66. Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory. In J. Connell, A. Kubisch, L. Schorr, & C. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 65-92). Aspen, CO: The Aspen Institute.