Research required for the effective implementation of the framework convention on tobacco control, articles 9 and 10

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 777-788

  Gray, Nigel ^a   Borland, Ron ^a  

^a CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,3 BUTADIENE; 2 NAPHTHYLAMINE; 4 BIPHENYLAMINE; ACETALDEHYDE; ACROLEIN; ACRYLONITRILE; BENZENE; BENZO[A]PYRENE; CADMIUM; CARBON MONOXIDE; CARCINOGEN; CATECHOL; CROTONALDEHYDE; FORMALDEHYDE; HYDROGEN CYANIDE; HYDROQUINONE; NITROGEN OXIDE; NITROSONORNICOTINE; TOBACCO SMOKE; TOXIN;

ADDICTION; CARCINOGENIC ACTIVITY; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LAW; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCT PARAMETERS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SMOKING; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

DISCLOSURE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NICOTINE; PRODUCT PACKAGING; RESEARCH; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION;

EID: 84875578396     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts175     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Baker, R. R., Pereira da Silva, J. R., & Smith, G. (2004a). The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part I: Flavourings and additives. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, S3-S37. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00189-3
2. Baker, R. R., Pereira da Silva, J. R., & Smith, G. (2004b). The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part II: Casing ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, S39-S52. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2003.08.009
3. Bates, C., Connolly, G. N., & Jarvis, M. (2002). Tobacco additives-Cigarette engineering and nicotine addiction. London: Action on Smoking and Health. Retrieved from www.ash.org.uk/
4. Benowitz, N. L. (2001). Compensatory smoking of low yield cigarettes. In D. R. Shopland, D. M. Burns, N. L. Benowitz, & R. H. Amacher (Eds.), Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monographs No. 13) (pp. 39-63). Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://dccps.cancer.gov/ TCRB/monographs/
5. Benowitz, N. L., Hall, S. M., Herning, R. I., Jacob, P., III, Jones, R. T., & Osman, A. L. (1983). Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine. New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 139-142. doi:10.1056/ NEJM198307213090303
6. Benowitz, N. L., & Henningfield, J. E. (1994). Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction: The implications for tobacco regulation. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 123-125. doi:10.1056/NEJM199407143310212
7. Boyle, P., Gray, N., Henningfield, J., Seffrin, J., & Zatonski, W. (2010). Tobacco: Science, policy and public health (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Burns, D. M., Anderson, C. M., & Gray, N. (2011a). Do changes in cigarette design influence the rise in adenocarcinoma of the lung? Cancer Causes Control, 22, 13-22. doi:10.1007/s10552-010-9660-0
9. Burns, D. M., Anderson, C. M., & Gray, N. (2011b). Has the lung cancer risk from smoking increased over the last fifty years? Cancer Causes Control, 22, 389-397. doi:10.1007/ s10552-010-9708-1
10. Carpenter, C. M., Wayne, G. F., & Connolly, G. N. (2005). Designing cigarettes for women: New findings from the tobacco industry documents. Addiction, 100, 837-851. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01072.x
11. Carpenter, C. M., Wayne, G. F., Pauly, J. L., Koh, H. K., & Connolly, G. N. (2005). New cigarette brands with flavors that appeal to youth: Tobacco marketing strategies. Health Affairs, 24, 1601-1610. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1601
12. Counts, M. E., Morton, M. J., Laffoon, S. W., Cox, R. H., & Lipowicz, P. J. (2005). Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 41, 185-227. doi:10.1016/j. yrtph.2004.12.002
13. Djordjevic, M. (2010). Nicotine content in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In P. Boyle, N. Gray, J. Henningfield, F. J. Seidler, & W. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco, science, policy and public health (2nd ed.) (pp. 198-219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Djordjevic, M. V., Fan, J., Ferguson. S., & Hoffmann, D. (1995). Self-regulation of smoking intensity. Smoke yields of the low-nicotine, low-"tar" cigarettes. Carcinogenesis, 16, 2015-2021. doi:10.1093/carcin/16.9.2015
15. Doll, R. (2004). Evolution of knowledge of the smoking epidemic. In P. Boyle, N. Gray, J. Henningfield, & W. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco, science, policy and public health (1st ed.) (pp. 3-16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1950). Smoking and carcinoma of the lung: Preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 2, 739-748. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
17. Fowles, J., & Dybing, E. (2003). Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tobacco Control, 12, 424-430. doi:10.1136/tc.12.4.424
18. Gordon, D. L. (1992). PM's Global Strategy: Marlboro Product Technology. Retrieved from http://tobaccodocuments.org/ product_design/948615.html
19. Gray, N., Henningfield, J. E., Benowitz, N. L., Connolly, G. N., Dresler, C., Fagerstrom, K., et al. (2005). Toward a comprehensive long term nicotine policy. Tobacco Control, 14, 161-165. doi:10.1136/tc.2004.010272
20. Gray, N., Zaridze, D., Robertson, C., Krivosheeva, L., Sigacheva, N., & Boyle, P. (2000). Variation within global cigarette brands in tar, nicotine, and certain nitrosamines: Analytic study. Tobacco Control, 9, 351-354. doi:10.1136/tc.9.3.351
21. Hatsukami, D. K., Perkins, K. A., LeSage, M. G., Ashley, D. L., Henningfield, J. E., Benowitz, N. L., et al. (2010). Nicotine reduction revisited: Science and future directions. Tobacco Control, 19, e1-e10. doi:10.1136/tc.2009
22. Hecht, S. S. (2012). Research opportunities related to establishing standards for tobacco products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14, 18-28. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq216
23. Henningfield, J., & Benowitz, N. (2010). Pharmacology of nicotine addiction. In P. Boyle, N. Gray, J. Henningfield, J. Seffrin, & W. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco: Science, policy and public health (2nd ed.) (pp. 155-170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Henningfield, J. E., Benowitz, N. L., Slade, J., Houston, T. P., Davis, R. M., & Deitchman, S. (1998). Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 7, 281-293.
25. Henningfield, J. E., Hatsukami, D. K., Zeller, M., & Peters, E. (2011). Conference on abuse liability and appeal of tobacco products: Conclusions and recommendations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 116, 1-7.
26. Herning, R. I., Jones, R. T., Bachman, J., & Mines, A. H. (1981). Puff volume increases when low-nicotine cigarettes are smoked. British Medical Journal, 283, 187-189. doi:10.1136/bmj.283.6285.187
27. Hoffmann, D., Djordjevic, M. V., & Hoffmann, I. (1997). The changing cigarette. Preventative Medicine, 26, 427-434. doi:10.1006/pmed.1997.0183
28. Hoffmann, D., & Hoffmann, I. (1994). Tobacco consumption and lung cancer. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
29. Hoffmann, D., & Hoffmann, I. (2010). The changing cigarette: Chemical studies and bioassays. In P. Boyle, N. Gray, J. Henningfield, J. Seffrin, & W. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco: Science, policy and public health (2nd ed.) (pp. 94-125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Hoffmann, D., Hoffmann, I., & El-Bayoumy, K. (2001). The less harmful cigarette: A controversial issue. A tribute to Ernst L. Wynder. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 14, 767-790. doi:10.1021/tx000260u
31. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1985). Tobacco habits other than smoking; betel-quid & areca-nut chewing; and some related nitrosamines (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 37). Lyon, France: IARC Press.
32. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1986). Tobacco smoking (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 38). Lyon, France: IARC Press.
33. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2004). Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking (IARC Monographs Vol. 83). Lyon, France: IARC Press.
34. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2007). Smokeless tobacco and tobacco-related nitrosamines (IARC Monographs vol. 89). Lyon, France: IARC Press.
35. King, W., Carter, S. M., Borland, R., Chapman, S., & Gray, N. (2003). The Australian tar derby: The origins and fate of a low tar harm reduction programme. Tobacco Control, 12, iii61-iii70. doi:10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii61
36. Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., Khouw, V., & Pope, M. A. (1980). The misuse of "less-hazardous" cigarettes and its detection: Hole-blocking of ventilated filters. American Journal of Public Health, 70, 1202-1203. doi:10.2105/ AJPH.70.11.1202
37. Kozlowski, L. T., & O'Connor, R. J. (2002). Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tobacco Control, 11, i40- i50. doi:10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40
38. Malone, R. E. (Ed.). (2011). Menthol cigarettes [whole issue]. Tobacco Control, 20 (Suppl. 2), ii1-ii56.
39. Philip Morris International (2010). 2010 annual report. Retrieved from http://investors.pmi.com/
40. Proctor, R. (2012) Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. San Francisco: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520270169
41. Robertson, C. R., & Hurt, R. (2010). In their own words: An epoch of deceit and deception. In P. Boyle, N. Gray, J. Henningfield, J. Seffrin, & W. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco: Science, policy and public health (2nd ed.) (pp. 57-92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). (2010). Addictiveness and attractiveness of tobacco additives. Brussels: European Union. ISSN:1831-4783, ISBN:978-92-79-12788-5. doi:10.2772/39398
43. Shopland, D. R., Burns, D. M., Benowitz, N. L., & Amacher, R. H. (Eds.). (2001). Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monographs No. 13). Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://dccps.cancer.gov/TCRB/ monographs/
44. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1981). The health consequences of smoking: The changing cigarette. A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Smoking and Health. Retrieved from http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/
45. U.S. Department of Health And Human Services (2001). Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured levels of tar and nicotine (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 13). Frederick, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
46. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2011). Menthol cigarettes and public health: Review of the scientific evidence and recommendations. Rockville, MD: Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee.
47. Wayne, G. F., & Carpenter, C. M. (2010). Manipulating product design to reinforce tobacco addiction. In P. Boyle, N. Gray, J. Henningfield, J. Seffrin, & W. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco: Science, policy and public health (2nd ed.) (pp. 171-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Wayne, G. F., & Connolly, G. N. (2002). How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93. Tobacco Control, 11, i32-i39. doi:10.1136/tc.11. suppl_1.i32.
49. Wertz M. S., Kyriss T., Paranjape S., & Glantz S.A. (2011). The toxic effects of cigarette additives. Phillip Morris' project mix reconsidered: An analysis of documents released through litigation. PLoS Medicine, 8, e1001145.
50. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. (2007). Setting maximum limits for toxic constituents in cigarette smoke. In WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation, The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: Report of a WHO Study Group (WHO Technical Report Series No. 945) (pp. 77-102). Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/en/
51. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (2008a). Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: Tobaccospecific nitrosamines and selected other constituents. In WHO Study Group on Tobacco Regulation, The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: Second report of a WHO Study Group (WHO Technical Report Series No. 951) (pp. 45-277). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/ tobreg/en/
52. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. (2008b). Levels of toxicants per milligram of nicotine for international Philip Morris brands, Canadian brands and Australian brands. In WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation, The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: Second report of a WHO Study Group (WHO Technical Report Series No. 951) (pp. 138-198). Retrieved from www. who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/en/
53. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. (2009). Report on setting regulatory limits for carcinogens in smokeless tobacco. In WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation, Report on the scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: Third Report of a WHO Study Group (WHO technical report series No. 955) (pp. 23-41). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/en/
54. Wynder, E. L., & Graham, E. A. (1950). Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma: A study of 684 proved cases. Journal of the American Medical Association, 143, 329-336. doi:10.1001/ jama.1950.02910390001001
55. Wynder, E. L., Graham, E. A., & Croninger, A. B. (1953). Experimental production of carcinoma with cigarette tar. Cancer Research, 13, 855-864. Retrieved from http://cancerres.aacr journals.org/
56. Zeller M., Hatsukami D., The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction Group. (2009). The strategic dialogue on tobacco harm reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US. Tobacco Control, 18, 324-332. doi:10.1136/ tc.2008.027318