Global Conformational Selection and Local Induced Fit for the Recognition between Intrinsic Disordered p53 and CBP

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Yu, Qingfen ^a   Ye, Wei ^a   Wang, Wei ^a   Chen, Hai Feng ^a,b  

^a Shanghai Jiao Tong University   (China)

^b SHANGHAI CENTER FOR BIOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC AMP RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEAR RECEPTOR COACTIVATOR; PROTEIN P53;

ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NUCLEAR COACTIVATOR BINDING DOMAIN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROOM TEMPERATURE; TRANSACTIVATION DOMAIN;

CYCLIC AMP RESPONSE ELEMENT-BINDING PROTEIN; KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN P53;

EID: 84875469274     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059627     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Janknecht R, Hunter T, (1996) Transcription. A growing coactivator network. Nature 383: 22-23.
2. Shiama N, (1997) The p300/CBP family: integrating signals with transcription factors and chromatin. Trends Cell Biol 7: 230-236.
3. Demarest SJ, Martinez-Yamout M, Chung J, Chen H, Xu W, et al. (2002) Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. Nature 415: 549-553.
4. Lin CH, Hare BJ, Wagner G, Harrison SC, Maniatis T, et al. (2001) A small domain of CBP/p300 binds diverse proteins: solution structure and functional studies. Mol Cell 8: 581-590.
5. Demarest SJ, Deechongkit S, Jane Dyson H, Evans RM, Wright PE, (2004) Packing, specificity, and mutability at the binding interface between the p160 coactivator and CREB-binding protein. Protein science 13: 203-210.
6. Mujtaba S, He Y, Zeng L, Yan S, Plotnikova O, et al. (2004) Structural mechanism of the bromodomain of the coactivator CBP in p53 transcriptional activation. Mol Cell 13: 251-263.
7. Ferreon JC, Lee CW, Arai M, Martinez-Yamout MA, Dyson HJ, et al. (2009) Cooperative regulation of p53 by modulation of ternary complex formation with CBP/p300 and HDM2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 6591-6596.
8. Unger T, Nau MM, Segal S, Minna JD, (1992) p53: a transdominant regulator of transcription whose function is ablated by mutations occurring in human cancer. EMBO J 11: 1383-1390.
9. Lin J, Chen J, Elenbaas B, Levine AJ, (1994) Several hydrophobic amino acids in the p53 amino-terminal domain are required for transcriptional activation, binding to mdm-2 and the adenovirus 5 E1B 55-kD protein. Genes Dev 8: 1235-1246.
10. Lee CW, Martinez-Yamout MA, Dyson HJ, Wright PE, (2010) Structure of the p53 transactivation domain in complex with the nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain of CREB binding protein. Biochemistry 49: 9964-9971.
11. Liu J, Faeder JR, Camacho CJ, (2009) Toward a quantitative theory of intrinsically disordered proteins and their function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 19819-19823.
12. Wells M, Tidow H, Rutherford TJ, Markwick P, Jensen MR, et al. (2008) Structure of tumor suppressor p53 and its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 5762-5767.
13. Henkels CH, Oas TG, (2006) Ligation-state hydrogen exchange: coupled binding and folding equilibria in ribonuclease P protein. J Am Chem Soc 128: 7772-7781.
14. Fersht AR, Daggett V, (2002) Protein folding and unfolding at atomic resolution. Cell 108: 573-582.
15. Klepeis JL, Lindorff-Larsen K, Dror RO, Shaw DE, (2009) Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19: 120-127.
16. Shea JE, Brooks CL, (2001) From folding theories to folding proteins: a review and assessment of simulation studies of protein folding and unfolding. Annu Rev Phys Chem 52: 499-535.
17. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL, (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 12: 2001-2014.
18. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE, Simmerling I, CL, Wang J, et al. (2010) Amber 11, University of California, San Francisco.
19. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML, (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics 79: 926.
20. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L, (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: An N{dot operator}log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 98: 10089.
21. Wang JM, Cieplak P, Kollman PA, (2000) How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules. J Comput Chem 21: 1049-1074.
22. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC, (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. Journal of Computational Physics 23: 327-341.
23. Levitt M, (1983) Molecular dynamics of native protein. II. Analysis and nature of motion. J Mol Biol 168: 621-657.
24. Sammon JW, (1969) A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. Computers, IEEE Transactions on 100: 401-409.
25. Chen HF, Luo R, (2007) Binding induced folding in p53-MDM2 complex. J Am Chem Soc 129: 2930-2937.
26. Agakishiev G, Aggarwal MM, Ahammed Z, Alakhverdyants AV, Alekseev I, et al. (2012) Identified hadron compositions in p+p and Au+Au collisions at high transverse momenta at radicalS(NN) = 200 GeV. Phys Rev Lett 108: 072302.
27. Kuo SW, Lin HI, Ho JH, Shih YR, Chen HF, et al. (2012) Regulation of the fate of human mesenchymal stem cells by mechanical and stereo-topographical cues provided by silicon nanowires. Biomaterials 33: 5013-5022.
28. Sun Y, Chang YH, Chen HF, Su YH, Su HF, et al. (2012) Risk of Parkinson disease onset in patients with diabetes: a 9-year population-based cohort study with age and sex stratifications. Diabetes Care 35: 1047-1049.
29. Ye W, Chen Y, Wang W, Yu Q, Li Y, et al. (2012) Insight into the stability of cross-beta amyloid fibril from VEALYL short peptide with molecular dynamics simulation. PLoS One 7: e36382.
30. Qin F, Chen Y, Wu M, Li Y, Zhang J, et al. (2010) Induced fit or conformational selection for RNA/U1A folding. RNA 16: 1053-1061.
31. Ye W, Qin F, Zhang J, Luo R, Chen HF, (2012) Atomistic Mechanism of MicroRNA Translation Upregulation via Molecular Dynamics Simulations. PLoS One 7: e43788.
32. Sharp KA, Honig B, (1990) Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 19: 301-332.
33. Caflisch A, Karplus M, (1994) Molecular dynamics simulation of protein denaturation: solvation of the hydrophobic cores and secondary structure of barnase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 1746-1750.
34. Vendruscolo M, Paci E, Dobson CM, Karplus M, (2001) Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 409: 641-645.
35. Gsponer J, Caflisch A, (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 6719-6724.
36. Wlodarski T, Zagrovic B, (2009) Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 19346-19351.
37. Massey FJ (1951) The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American statistical Association: 68-78.
38. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of computational and graphical statistics: 299-314.
39. Day R, Daggett V, (2005) Ensemble versus single-molecule protein unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 13445-13450.
40. Petsko GA (2003) Analyzing molecular interactions. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 8: Unit8 1.
41. Ritort F, Bustamante C, Tinoco I, (2002) A two-state kinetic model for the unfolding of single molecules by mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 13544-13548.
42. Matouschek A, Kellis JT, Serrano L, Fersht AR, (1989) Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering. Nature 340: 122-126.
43. Matouschek A, Fersht AR, (1993) Application of physical organic chemistry to engineered mutants of proteins: Hammond postulate behavior in the transition state of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 7814-7818.
44. Otzen DE, Itzhaki LS, elMasry NF, Jackson SE, Fersht AR, (1994) Structure of the transition state for the folding/unfolding of the barley chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 and its implications for mechanisms of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 10422-10425.
45. Li A, Daggett V, (1994) Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by use of molecular dynamics: chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 10430-10434.
46. Fersht AR, (2000) Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 1525-1529.
47. Fernandez-Escamilla AM, Cheung MS, Vega MC, Wilmanns M, Onuchic JN, et al. (2004) Solvation in protein folding analysis: combination of theoretical and experimental approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 2834-2839.
48. Fersht AR, Sato S, (2004) Phi-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 7976-7981.
49. Livengood JA, Scoggin KE, Van Orden K, McBryant SJ, Edayathumangalam RS, et al. (2002) p53 Transcriptional activity is mediated through the SRC1-interacting domain of CBP/p300. J Biol Chem 277: 9054-9061.
50. Teufel DP, Freund SM, Bycroft M, Fersht AR, (2007) Four domains of p300 each bind tightly to a sequence spanning both transactivation subdomains of p53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 7009-7014.
51. Luo R, David L, Gilson MK, (2002) Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems. J Comput Chem 23: 1244-1253.
52. Boehr DD, Wright PE, (2008) Biochemistry. How do proteins interact? Science 320: 1429-1430.
53. Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG, (1991) The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254: 1598-1603.
54. Tsai CJ, Ma B, Nussinov R, (1999) Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 9970-9972.
55. Boehr DD, McElheny D, Dyson HJ, Wright PE, (2006) The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science 313: 1638-1642.
56. Weikl TR, von Deuster C, (2009) Selected-fit versus induced-fit protein binding: kinetic differences and mutational analysis. Proteins 75: 104-110.
57. Koshland DE, (1958) Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 44: 98-104.
58. Rini JM, Schulze-Gahmen U, Wilson IA, (1992) Structural evidence for induced fit as a mechanism for antibody-antigen recognition. Science 255: 959-965.
59. Turjanski AG, Gutkind JS, Best RB, Hummer G, (2008) Binding-induced folding of a natively unstructured transcription factor. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000060.
60. Schrank TP, Bolen DW, Hilser VJ, (2009) Rational modulation of conformational fluctuations in adenylate kinase reveals a local unfolding mechanism for allostery and functional adaptation in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16984-16989.
61. Csermely P, Palotai R, Nussinov R, (2010) Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: an extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem Sci 35: 539-546.
62. James LC, Tawfik DS, (2003) Conformational diversity and protein evolution-a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem Sci 28: 361-368.
63. Okazaki K, Takada S, (2008) Dynamic energy landscape view of coupled binding and protein conformational change: induced-fit versus population-shift mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11182-11187.
64. Tompa P, (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27: 527-533.