Long-acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents and Young Adults: Patient and Provider Perspectives

Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 86-95

  Kavanaugh, Megan L ^a   Frohwirth, Lori ^a   Jerman, Jenna ^a   Popkin, Ronna ^b   Ethier, Kathleen ^c  

^a GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Contraception; Long acting reversible contraception; Teen pregnancy; Unplanned pregnancy; Young adults

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LONG ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; COUNSELING; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; PATIENTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875370389     PISSN: 10833188     EISSN: 18734332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Finer L.B., Henshaw S.K. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006, 38:90.
2. Committee on Unintended Pregnancy The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families 1995, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC.
3. Finer L.B. Unintended pregnancy among U.S. adolescents: accounting for sexual activity. J Adolesc Health 2010, 47:312.
4. Frost J.J., Darroch J.E., Remez L. Improving Contraceptive Use in the United States 2008, Guttmacher Institute, New York.
5. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009, 114:1434. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group.
6. Speidel J.J., Harper C.C., Shields W.C. The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy. Contraception 2008, 78:197.
7. Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. Contraceptive Technology: Eighteenth Revised Edition 2004, 773-845. Ardent Media, New York, NY. R.A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. Stewart, A. Nelson, W. Cates, F. Guest, D. Kowal (Eds.).
8. Winner B., Peipert J.F., Zhao Q., et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptions. N Engl J Med 2012 1998, 366.
9. Finer L.B., Jerman J., Kavanaugh M.L. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. Fertil Steril 2012, 98:893.
10. Kaye K., Suellentrop K., Sloup C. The fog zone: How misperceptions, magical thinking, and ambivalence put young adults at risk for unplanned pregnancy 2009, National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, Washington, DC.
11. Foster D.G., Biggs M.A., Ralph L.J., et al. Family planning and life planning reproductive intentions among individuals seeking reproductive health care. Womens Health Issues 2008, 18:351.
12. Mosher W.D., Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 2010, 23(29).
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 110:1493.
14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraceptives: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2011, 118:184.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010, 59:1-6.
16. Harper C.C., Blum M., de Bocanegra H.T., et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 111:1359.
17. Madden T., Allsworth J.E., Hladky K.J., et al. Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes. Contraception 2010, 81:112.
18. Tyler C.P., Whiteman M.K., Zapata L.B., et al. Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2012, 119:762.
19. Russo J.A., Creinin M.D. Contraception: IUD use in nulliparous and adolescent women. OBG Management 2010, 23:8.
20. Fleming K.L., Sokoloff A., Raine T.R. Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception 2010, 82:178.
21. Rose S.B., Cooper A.J., Baker N.K., et al. Attitudes toward long-acting reversible contraception among young women seeking abortion. J Womens Health 2011, 20:1729.
22. Spies E.L., Askelson N.M., Gelman E., et al. Young women's knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to long-acting reversible contraceptives. Womens Health Issues 2010, 20:394.
23. Stanwood N.L., Bradley K.A. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:1417.
24. Whitaker A.K., Johnson L.M., Harwood B., et al. Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception 2008, 78:211.
25. Frost JJ: Using the NSFG to examine the scope and source of contraceptive and preventive reproductive health services obrained by U.S. women, 1995-2002. Paper presented at: Research Conference on the National Survey of Family Growth; October 19, 2006; Hyattsville, MD.
26. Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Zapata LB, et al: Meeting the contraceptive needs of adolescents and young adults: Youth-friendly and long-acting reversible contraceptive services in U.S. family planning facilities. J Adolesc Health. forthcoming.
27. Creswell J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Approaches 2007, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 15-32. 2nd ed.
28. Maxwell J.A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach 2005, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
29. Warren C.A.B., Karner T.X. Discovering Qualitative Methods 2010, Oxford University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
30. Miles M., Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
31. Moustakas C. Phenomenological Research Methods 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
32. Carey M.A. Comment: Concerns in the analysis of focus group data. Qual Health Res 1995, 5:487.
33. Sundstrom B. Fifty years on " the pill" : a qualitative analysis of nondaily contraceptive options. Contraception 2012, 86:4.
34. Vaughan B., Trussell J., Kost K., et al. Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception 2008, 78:271.
35. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening. Obstet Gynecol 2009, 114:1409.
36. Hall K.S., Moreau C., Trussell J. Determinants of and disparities in reproductive health service use among adolescent and young adult women in the United States, 2002-2008. Am J Public Health 2012, 102:359.
37. Mestad R., Secura G., Allsworth J.E., et al. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011, 84:493.
38. Office of Population Affairs. Clinical Training Center for Family Planning: CTCFP/Title X Initiative: LARC-Reliable and Reversible Contraception of Choice 2012; Accessed August 4, 2012. http://www.larc.ctcfp.org/.