Family Planning and Life Planning. Reproductive Intentions Among Individuals Seeking Reproductive Health Care

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 351-359

  Foster, Diana G ^a   Biggs, M Antonia ^a   Ralph, Lauren J ^a   Arons, Abigail ^a   Brindis, Claire D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FAMILY PLANNING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; PREGNANCY; RACE DIFFERENCE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POVERTY; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 50649088604     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abma J.C., Martinez G.M., Mosher W.D., and Dawson B.S. Teenagers in the United States: Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2002. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 23 24 (2004)
2. Amaral G., Foster D.G., Biggs M.A., Jasik C., Judd S., and Brindis C.D. Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: A cost analysis of family planning services in California. Health Services Research 42 (2007) 1960-1980
3. Baydar N. Consequences for children of their birth planning status. Family Planning Perspectives 27 (1995) 228-234
4. Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy. Family PACT Program Report Fiscal Year 04/05. A report to the State of California Department of Health Services Office of Family Planning (2005). www.familypact.org Accessed June 26, 2007
5. Braveman P., Marchi K., Egerter S., Pearl M., and Neuhaus J. Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: The importance of pre-pregnancy factors. Obstetrics & Gynecology 95 (2000) 874-880
6. In: Brown S., and Eisenberg L. (Eds). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families (1995), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
7. Finer L.B., Frohwirth L.F., Dauphinee L.A., Singh S., and Moore A.M. Reasons U.S. women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37 (2005) 110-118
8. Finer L., and Henshaw S. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38 (2006) 90-96
9. Frost J.J., and Oslak S. Teenagers' pregnancy intentions and decisions: A study of young women in California choosing to give birth. [Occasional Report No. 2] (1999), The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York
10. Gilbert W., Jandial D., Field N., Bigelow P., and Danielson B. Birth outcomes in teenage pregnancies. Journal of Maternal Fetal Neonatal Medicine 16 (2004) 265-270
11. Grady W., Tanfer K., Billy J., and Lincoln-Hansen J. Men's perceptions of their roles and responsibilities regarding sex, contraception, and childrearing. Family Planning Perspectives 28 5 (1996) 221-226
12. Harper, C., Blum, M., Thiel de Bocanegra, H., Darney, P. D., Speidel. J. J., Policar, M., et al. Challenges in translating evidence to clinical practice: Intrauterine contraception in California. Presented at the November 2007 APHA annual meeting, Washington DC.
13. Hotz V., McElroy S., and Sanders S. The impact of teenage childbearing on the mothers and the consequences of those impacts for government. In: Maynard R. (Ed). Kids having kids (1997), The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC 55-94
14. Lifflander A., Gaydos L.M., and Hogue C.J. Circumstances of pregnancy: Low income women in Georgia describe the difference between planned and unplanned pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health Journal 11 (2007) 81-89
15. Martinez G., Chandra A., Abma J., Jones J., and Mosher W.D. Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: Data on men and women from Cycle 6 of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 23 26 (2004)
16. In: Maynard R. (Ed). Kids having kids (1997), The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC
17. Prager S., and Darney P. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women. Contraception 75 (2006) S12-S15
18. Santelli J., Kouzis A., Hoover D., Polacsek M., Burwell L., and Celentano D. Stage of behavior change for condom use: The influence of partner type, relationship and pregnancy factors. Family Planning Perspectives 28 (1996) 101-107
19. Santelli J., Rochat R., Hatfield-Timajchy K., Gilbert B.C., Curtis K., Cabral R., et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 35 (2003) 94-101
20. Suhonen S., Haukkamaa M., Jakobsson T., and Rauramo I. Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: A comparative study. Contraception 69 (2004) 407-412
21. Trussell J., and Vaughan B. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: Results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives 31 (1999) 64-72
22. Weinstock H., Berman S., and Cates W. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 36 (2004) 6-10
23. Zabin L.S., Huggins G.R., Emerson M.R., and Cullins V.E. Partner effects on a woman's intention to conceive: "Not with this partner". Family Planning Perspectives 32 (2000) 39-45