Fifty years on "the pill": A qualitative analysis of nondaily contraceptive options

Contraception

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 4-11

  Sundstrom, Beth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Birth control; Decision making; Knowledge, attitudes and practice; Nondaily contraception; Qualitative methods; Young women

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ETHINYLESTRADIOL PLUS ETONOGESTREL; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDOM; DEPRESSION; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG MECHANISM; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION; FEMALE; GROUNDED THEORY; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; KNOWLEDGE; MOOD DISORDER; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIDE EFFECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT ATTITUDE; WEIGHT GAIN;

ADOLESCENT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862006431     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Beck The birth-control riddle - fifty years after the pill's debut, almost half of pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned Wall Street J 2010 D.1
2. J. Trussell, and L.L. Wynn Reducing unintended pregnancy in the United States Contraception 77 2008 1 5
3. W.D. Mosher, and J. Jones Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008 Vital Health Statistics 23 29 2010 1 44
4. J.F. Peipert, Q. Zhao, and J.E. Allsworth Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception Obstet Gynecol 117 2011 1105 1113
5. C. Moreau, K. Cleland, and J. Trussell Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States Contraception 76 2007 267 272
6. L.P. Shulman Advances in female hormonal contraception: current alternatives to oral regimens Treat Endocrinol 2 2003 247 256
7. F.A. Sonnenberg, R.T. Burkman, C.G. Hagerty, L. Speroff, and T. Speroff Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods Contraception 69 2004 447 459
8. C. Brucker, U. Karck, and E. Merkle Cycle control, tolerability, efficacy and acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring, NuvaRing®: results of clinical experience in Germany Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 13 2008 31 38
9. J.P. Levine Nondaily hormonal contraceptives: establishing a fit between product characteristics and patient preferences J Fam Pract 53 2004 904 913
10. G.S. Merki-Feld, and M. Hund Clinical experience with NuvaRing® in daily practice in Switzerland: cycle control and acceptability among women of all reproductive ages Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 12 2007 240 247
11. F. Roumen, M. Berg, and E. Hoomans The combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®): first experience in daily clinical practice in the Netherlands Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 11 2006 14 22
12. N.N. Sarkar The combined contraceptive vaginal device (NuvaRing®): a comprehensive review Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 10 2005 73 78
13. L.R.B. Huber, and J.L. Ersek Contraceptive use among sexually active university students J Womens Health 18 2009 1063 1070
14. G. Lamvu, M.J. Steiner, S. Condon, and K. Hartmann Consistency between most important reasons for using contraception and current method used: the influence of health care providers Contraception 73 2006 399 403
15. K. Tanfer Knowledge, attitudes and intentions of American women regarding the hormonal implant Fam Plann Perspect 26 1994 60 65
16. Tanfer K, Wierzbicki S, Payn B. Why are US women not using long-acting contraceptives? Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32:176-183, 191.
17. R. Sitruk-Ware Contraception: an international perspective Contraception 73 2006 215 222
18. C. Free, J. Ogden, and R. Lee Young women's contraception use as a contextual and dynamic behaviour: a qualitative study Psychol Health 20 2005 673 690
19. S. Freeman Nondaily hormonal contraception: considerations in contraceptive choice and patient counseling J Am Acad Nurse Pract 16 2004 226 238
20. M.T. Hickey Female college students' knowledge, perceptions, and use of emergency contraception J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 38 2009 399 405
21. K.D. Bryant Contraceptive use and attitudes among female college students ABNF J 20 2009 12 16
22. A. Neustadt, S. Holmquist, S. Davis, and M. Gilliam Sexual, relationship, contraceptive and personal factors influencing emergency contraception use: a qualitative study Contraception 84 2011 266 272
23. R. Johnson, M. Nshom, A.M. Nye, and A.T. Cohall There's always Plan B: adolescent knowledge, attitudes and intention to use emergency contraception Contraception 81 2010 128 132
24. H. Rubin, and I. Rubin Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data 2nd ed. 2005 SAGE, Inc. Thousand Oaks (Calif)
25. B.G. Glaser, and A.L. Strauss The discovery of grounded theory 1967 Chicago Aldine
26. J. Corbin, and A.L. Strauss Basics of qualitative research 3rd ed. 2008 Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks (Calif)
27. B.L. Berg Qualitative research methods for the social sciences 7th ed. 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Boston (Ma)
28. L.M. Williamson, K. Buston, and H. Sweeting Young women's perceptions of pregnancy risk and use of emergency contraception: findings from a qualitative study Contraception 79 2009 310 315
29. E. Cheung, and C. Free Factors influencing young women's decision making regarding hormonal contraceptives: a qualitative study Contraception 71 2005 426 431
30. R.L. Wright, C.J. Frost, and D.K. Turok A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD Contraception 2011 May 26. [Epub ahead of print]
31. L.R. Brunner Huber, and K.R. Huber Contraceptive choices of women 35-44 years of age: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Ann Epidemiol 19 2009 823 833
32. M. Gilliam, S. Holmquist, and A. Berlin Factors associated with willingness to use the contraceptive vaginal ring Contraception 76 2007 30 34
33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:184 - 96.