Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1417-1422

  Stanwood, Nancy L ^a,b   Bradley, Karen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b URMC Box 668 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; KNOWLEDGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARITY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; PREGNANCY;

EID: 33845438455     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24-9.
2. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:6-15.
3. Wulf D. Sharing responsibility: women, society and abortion worldwide. New York (NY): Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1999.
4. Darroch JE, Singh S, Frost JJ. Differences in teenage pregnancy rates among five developed countries: the roles of sexual activity and contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect 2001;33:244-50, 281.
5. Cheyne KL. Adolescent pregnancy prevention. Curr Opin Pediatr 1999;11:594-7.
6. Piccinino LJ, Mosher WD. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:4-10, 46.
7. Glei DA. Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:73-80.
8. Templeman CL, Cook V, Goldsmith LJ, Powell J, Hertweck SP. Postpartum contraceptive use among adolescent mothers. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:770-6.
9. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Teen sex and pregnancy: facts in brief. New York (NY): Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1999.
10. Stevens-Simon C, Kelly L, Kulick R. A village would be nice but. . .it takes a long-acting contraceptive to prevent repeat adolescent pregnancies. Am J Prev Med 2001;21:60-5.
11. Henshaw SK, Kost K. Abortion patients in 1994-1995: characteristics and contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect 1996;28:140-7, 158.
12. Vikat B, Kosunen E, Rimpela M. Risk of postpartum induced abortion in Finland: a register-based study. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:84-90.
13. Cwiak C, Gellasch T, Zieman M. Peripartum contraceptive attitudes and practices. Contraception 2004;70:383-6.
14. Trussell J, Kost K. Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 1987;18:237-83.
15. Zibners A, Cromer BA, Hayes J. Comparison of continuation rates for hormonal contraception among adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1999;12:90-4.
16. Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson-Wally A. Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:168-75.
17. Mosher WD, Martinez G, Chandra A, Abma J, Willson S. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States, 1982-2002. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2004.
18. Improving access to quality care in family planning: medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
19. Spinelli A, Talamanca IF, Lauria L. Patterns of contraceptive use in 5 European countries. European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1403-8.
20. Trussell J, Leveque JA, Koenig JD, London R, Borden S, Henneberry J, et al. The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods. Am J Public Health 1995;85:494-503.
21. Chiou CF, Trussell J, Reyes E, Knight K, Wallace J, Udani J, et al. Economic analysis of contraceptives for women. Contraception 2003;68:3-10.
22. Chi IC. A bill of health for the IUD: where do we go from here? Adv Contracept 1994;10:121-31.
23. Ronnerdag M, Odlind V. Health effects of long-term use of the intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system: a follow-up study over 12 years of continuous use. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:716-21.
24. Sivin I, Stern J. Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20 micrograms/d and the copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices: a multicenter study. International Committee for Contraception Research (ICCR). Fertil Steril 1994;61:70-7.
25. Hubacher D, Lara-Ricalde R, Taylor DJ, Guerra-Infante F, Guzman-Rodriguez R. Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women. N Engl J Med 2001;345:561-7.
26. Improving access to quality care in family planning: medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/ publications/mec/mec.pdf. Retrieved September 15, 2006.
27. Stanwood NL, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device after induced or spontaneous abortion: a review of the evidence. BJOG 2001;108:1168-73.
28. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2004;70:89-96.
29. Sivin I, el Mahgoub S, McCarthy T, Mishell DR Jr, Shoupe D, Alvarez F, et al. Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study. Contraception 1990;42:361-78.
30. Farley TM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ, Chen JH, Meirik O. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Lancet 1992;339:785-8.
31. Toivonen J, Luukkainen T, Allonen H. Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection: three years' comparative experience of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:261-4.
32. Andersson K, Odlind V, Rybo G. Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper-releasing (Nova T) IUDs during five years of use: a randomized comparative trial. Contraception 1994;49:56-72.