Determinants of and disparities in reproductive health service use among adolescent and young adult women in the United States, 2002-2008

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 359-367

  Hall, Kelli Stidham ^a   Moreau, Caroline ^a   Trussell, James ^a,b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857314615     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300380     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Darroch JE, Frost JJ, Singh S, et al. Teenage sexual and reproductive behavior in developed countries. Guttmacher Occasional Rep. 2001;3:1-120.
2. Gavin L, MacKay AP, Brown K, et al. Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10-24 years- United States, 2002-2007. MMWR Surveill Sum. 2009;58(6)1-58.
3. Suellentrop K. Adolescent girls' use of health services. Science says, September 2008. Available at: http://www.teenpregnancy.org/works/pdf/Science- Says-28-girls-health.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2011.
4. Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC, Wilson SJ. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. Adv Data. 2004;350:1-36.
5. Abma JC, Martinez MG, Copen CE. Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, National Survey of Family Growth 2006- 2008. Vital Health Stat 23. June 2010;(30):1-47.
6. Kost K, Henshaw S, Carlin LUS. teenage pregnancies, births and abortions: national and state trends and trends by race and ethnicity. Guttmacher Institute, January 2010. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/ USTPtrends.pdf. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2011.
7. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):90-96. (Pubitemid 43882311)
8. Hall K, Moreau C, and Trussell J. Discouraging trends in reproductive health service use among adolescent and young adult women in the United States: an analysis of data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002 to 2008. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9): 2541-2548.
9. Potter J, Trussell J, Moreau C. Trends and determinants of reproductive health service use among young women in the USA. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12): 3010-3018.
10. Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, Groves RM, Van Hoewyk J. The 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2. June 2010;(150):1-36.
11. Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, Groves RM, van Hoewyk J, Willem J. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation. Vital Health Stat 2. July 2006; (142):1-82.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Survey of Family Growth. Available at: http://cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg.htm. Accessed November 19, 2011.
13. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of US women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23. December 2005; (25):1-160.
14. Frost JJ. Trends in women's use of sexual and reproductive health care services, 1995-2002. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(10):1814-1817.
15. Guttmacher Institute. Contraceptive needs and services, 2006. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/win/allstates2006.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2011.
16. Frost JJ, Henshaw SK, Sonfield A. Contraceptive Needs and Services: National and State Data, 2008 Update. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2010.
17. Guttmacher Institute. A real time look at the impact of the recession on publically funded family planning centers. Guttmacher Policy Rep. December 2009:2-10.
18. Guttmacher Institute. A real-time look at the impact of the recession on women's family planning and pregnancy decisions, September 2009. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/RecessionFP.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2011.
19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Bad economy blamed for women delaying pregnancy and annual check-up. News release, May 5, 2009. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from-home/publications/press-releases/nr05-05- 09-1.cfm. Accessed March 1, 2011.
20. Guttmacher Institute. Contraception works-and publicly funded family planning programs are essential to reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2011/03/09/index.html. Accessed March 10, 2011.
21. Sonfield A, Gold RB. Holding on to health reform and what we have gained for reproductive health. Contraception. 2011;83(4):285-288.
22. American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG announces new Pap smear and cancer screening guidelines. Available at: http://www.acog.org/acog- districts/dist-notice.cfm?recno=13&bulletin=3161. Accessed March 2, 2011.
23. Dailard C. Legislating against arousal: the growing divide between federal policy and teenage sexual behavior. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2006;9(3):12-16.
24. Dailard C, Richardson CT. Teenagers' access to confidential reproductive health services. Guttmacher Rep Public Policy. 2005;8(4):6-11.
25. Boonstra HD. Advocates call for a new approach after the era of "abstinence-only" sex education. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2009;12(1):6-11.
26. Jones RK, Boonstra H. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(5):182-191. (Pubitemid 40601859)