Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 127-132

  Aljateeli, Manar ^a   Wang, Hom Lay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

bone toimplant contact; implant surface; microdesign; osseointegration

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875367527     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318278a90b     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Palmer R, Smith B, Howe L, et al. Overview of implant dentistry. In: Palmer R (ed). Implants in Clinical Dentistry. London, United Kingdom: Martin Dunitz; 2002:7.
2. Steigenga JT, Al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, et al. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003;12:306-317.
3. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:391-401. (Pubitemid 128513397)
4. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, et al. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19:117-129.
5. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, et al. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:341-348. (Pubitemid 37141330)
6. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, et al. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1384-1390. (Pubitemid 32998715)
7. Shalabi MM, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:172-178. (Pubitemid 43374304)
8. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, et al. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68:1117-1130. (Pubitemid 127513679)
9. Stach RM, Kohles SS. A metaanalysis examining the clinical survivability of machined-surfaced and osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent. 2003;12:87-96.
10. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, et al. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater. 2007;23:844-854. (Pubitemid 46734313)
11. Hansson S, Norton M, The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech. 1999; 32:829-836. (Pubitemid 29287105)
12. Hahn H, Palich W. Preliminary evaluation of porous metal surfaced titanium for orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1970;4:571-577.
13. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, et al. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981;9:15-25. (Pubitemid 11056710)
14. Davies JE. Understanding periimplant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ. 2003;67:932-949.
15. Geesink RG, de Groot K, Klein CP. Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:17-22. (Pubitemid 18059151)
16. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, et al. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567-1575.
17. McGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, et al. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18: 82-92. (Pubitemid 37140457)
18. Schwartz-Arad D, Mardinger O, Levin L, et al. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:238-244. (Pubitemid 40592211)
19. Sanz A, Oyarzun A, Farias D, et al. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent. 2001;10: 126-131. (Pubitemid 33699319)
20. Ahn SJ, Leesungbok R, Lee SW. Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter implants with alternative surface treatments and different designs. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36:263-272.
21. Gonshor A, Goveia G, Sotirakis E. A prospective, multicenter, 4-year study of the ACE Surgical resorbable blast media implant. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29:174-180.
22. Feighan JE, Goldberg VM, Davy D, et al. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1380-1395.
23. Misch C. Dental implant surfaces: a review. In: Dolan J (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2008:602.
24. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, et al. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:302-310.
25. Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30:145-155. (Pubitemid 26036569)
26. Mustafa K, Silva Lopez B, Hultenby K, et al. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:116-128.
27. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, et al. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:779-784.
28. Bornstein MM, Wittneben J, Bragger U, et al. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible. J Periodontol. 2010;81:809-818.
29. Piattelli A, Manzon L, Scarano A, et al. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:805-810. (Pubitemid 128506103)
30. Cho SA, Park KT. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3611-3617.
31. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, et al. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:350-357. (Pubitemid 33723202)
32. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(suppl 4): 172-184.
33. Shibli JA, Grassi S, de Figueiredo LC, et al. Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: a histological study in human jaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007; 80:377-385.
34. Giavaresi G, Fini M, Chiesa R, et al. Osseointegration of sandblasted or anodised hydrothermally-treated titanium implants: mechanical, histomorphometric and bone hardness measurements. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25:806-813.
35. Cho SA, Jung SK. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4859-4863.
36. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, et al. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1706-1715.
37. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, et al. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:111-121.
38. Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, et al. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent. 2009;18:57-66.
39. Shapoff CA, Lahey B, Wasserlauf PA, et al. Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels around Laser-Lok collar dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:129-137.
40. Lind M, Overgaard S, Ongpipattanakul B, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 stimulates bone ongrowth to weight-loaded tricalcium phosphate coated implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78:377-382.
41. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Purchio AF, et al. Enhancement of bone ingrowth by transforming growth factor-beta. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1135-1147.
42. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, et al. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(suppl 4):185-206.
43. Yang Y, Cavin R, Ong JL. Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67:344-349. (Pubitemid 37517184)
44. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Dard M, et al. Functionalization of dental implant surfaces using adhesion molecules. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;73:88-96. (Pubitemid 40478263)
45. de Jonge LT, Leeuwenburgh SC, Wolke JG, et al. Organic-inorganic surface modifications for titanium implant surfaces. Pharm Res. 2008;25:2357-2369.
46. Park JW, Lee SG, Choi BJ, et al. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:533-541.
47. Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, et al. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1223-1231.
48. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2000;2:120-128.
49. Oh S, Tobin E, Yang Y, et al. In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite coatings of different crystallinities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005;20:726-731. (Pubitemid 41539887)
50. Orsini G, Piattelli M, Scarano A, et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol. 2007;78:209-218.
51. Meffert RM, Block MS, Kent JN. What is osseointegration? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1987;7:9-21.
52. Thomas KA, Cook SD. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985;19:875-901. (Pubitemid 16257498)
53. He F, Yang G, Wang X, et al. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/ dual acid-etched titanium implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24: 790-799.
54. Protivinsky J, Appleford M, Strnad J, et al. Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22: 542-550.
55. Donos N, Retzepi M, Wall I, et al. In vivo gene expression profile of guided bone regeneration associated with a microrough titanium surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:390-398.