Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 533-541

  Park, Jin Woo ^a   Lee, Sang Gu ^a   Choi, Byung Ju ^a   Suh, Jo Young ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion molecule; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Poor bone quality; Rough surface; Titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MARROW; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; FEMUR; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MARROW; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DURAPATITE; FEMUR; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 34548565510     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulousjaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
2. Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, et al. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: A 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:691-700.
3. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:272-281.
4. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721-764.
5. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001;72: 1384-1390.
6. Morris HR, Ochi S, Orenstein IH, Petrazzuolo V. AICRG, Part V: Factors influencing implant stability at placement and their influence on survival of Ankylos implants. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:162-170.
7. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surfaced biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
8. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Gin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
9. Itoh S, Matubara M, Kawauchi T, et al. Enhancement of bone ingrowth in titanium fiber mesh by rhBMP-2 and hyaluronic acid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:575-581.
10. Yang Y, Renee C, Ong JL. Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;67A:344-349.
11. Geißler U, Hempel U, Wolf C, Scharnweber D, Worch H, Wenzel KW. Collagen type I-coating of Ti6Al4V promotes adhesion of osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:752-760.
12. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A, Roessler S. Functionalization of dental implant surfaces using adhesion molecules. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:88-96.
13. Rezania A, Healy KE. Integrin subunits responsible for adhesion of human osteoblastlike cells to biomimetic peptide surfaces. J Orthop Res 1999;17:615-623.
14. Kantlehner M, Schaffner P, Finsinger D, et al. Surface coating with cyclic RGD peptides stimulates osteoblast adhesion and proliferation as well as bone formation.Chembiochem 2000; 1:107-114.
15. Pytela R, Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E. Identification and isolation of a 140 kD cell surface glycoprotein with properties expected of a fibronectin receptor. Cell 1985;40:191-198.
16. Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 1987;238:291-297.
17. Verrier S, Pallu S, Bareille R, et al. Function of linear and cyclic RGD-containing peptides in osteoprogenitor cells adhesion process. Biomaterials 2002;23:585-596.
18. Aota S, Nomizu M, Yamada KM. The short amino acid sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances cell-adhesive function. J Biol Chem 1994;269:2456-2461.
19. Krammer A, Craig D, Thomas WE, Schulten K, Vogel V. A structural model for force regulated integrin binding to fibronectin's RGD-synergy site. Matrix Biol 2002;21:139-147.
20. Skonier J, Bennett K, Rothwell V, et al. ßig-h3: A transforming growth factor beta-responsive gene encoding a secreted protein that inhibits cell attachment in vitro and suppresses the growth of CHO cells in nude mice. DNA Cell Biol 1994;13: 571-584.
21. Kim J-E, Kim E-H, Han E-H, et al. A TGF-ß-inducible cell adhesion molecule, ßig-h3, is downregulated in melorheostosis and involved in osteogenesis. J Cell Biochem 2000;77: 169-178.
22. Kim J-E, Jeong H-W, Nam J-O, et al. Identification of motifs in the fasciclin domains of the transforming growth factor-ß-induced matrix protein ßig-h3 that interact with the αvβ5 integrin. J Biol Chem 2002;29:46159-46165.
23. Lee J-H, Park J-W, Choi B-J, Kim I-S, Suh J-Y. Anorganic bone mineral coated with Tetra-Cell Adhesion Molecule enhances bone formation in rabbit calvarial defects. Key Eng Mater 2006;309:981-984.
24. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Quantified bone tissue reactions to various metallic materials with reference to the so-called osseointegration concept. In: Davies JE (ed). The Bone-Biomaterial Interface. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991: 357-363.
25. Iezzi G, Degidi M, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: A histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. J Oral Implantol 2005; 31:225-233.
26. 2 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:128-134.
27. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein R. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-129.
28. Froum SJ, Simon H, Cho SC, Elian N, Rohrer MD, Tarnow DP. Histologie evaluation of bone-implant contact of immediately loaded transitional implants after 6 to 27 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:54-60.
29. Hayakawa T, Kiba H, Yasuda S, Yamamoto H, Nemoto K. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of two types of retrieved human titanium implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:164-171.
30. Romanos GE, Testori T, Degidi M, Piattelli A. Histologic and histomorphometric findings from retrieved, immediately occlusally loaded implants in humans. J Periodontol 2005;76: 1823-1832.
31. Trisi P, Keith DJ, Rocco S. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:124-130.
32. Weng D, Hoffmeyer M, Hurzeler MB, Richter E-J. Osseotite vs machined surface in poor bone quality. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:703-708.
33. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5: 202-206.
34. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:659-666.
35. Sul Y-T, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Oxidized titanium screw coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:625-634.
36. 2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 2. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:314-324.
37. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 291-298.
38. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432.
39. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
40. Glauer R, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH, Scharer P. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: A prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:204-213.
41. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono- and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25: 229-235.
42. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71.
43. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Troger M, Newkam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: A correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:601-609.
44. Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:244-250.
45. Cochran DL, Schenk R, Buser D, Wozney JM, Jones AA. Recombinant human bone-morphogenetic protein-2 stimulation of bone formation around endosseous dental implants. J Periodontol 1999;70:139-150.
46. Fisher U, Hempel U, Becker D, et al. Transforming growth factor 1 immobilized adsorptively on Ti6Al4V and collagen type I coated Ti6Al4V maintains its biological activity. Biomaterials 2003;24:2631-2641.
47. Elmengaard B, Bechtold JE, Soballe K. In vivo effects of RGD-coated titanium implants inserted in two bone-gap models. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:249-255.
48. Tengvall P. Proteins at titanium interfaces. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Texter M, Thomsen P (eds). Titanium in Medicine. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2001:458-483.
49. Nanci A, Wuest JD, Peru L, et al. Chemical modification of titanium surfaces for covalent attachment of biological molecules. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:324-335.
50. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Cascardo G, et al. Surface engineering of titanium by collagen immobilization. Surface characterization and in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2003;24: 4639-4654.
51. Jansson E, Tengvall P. Adsorption of albumin and IgG to porous and smooth titanium. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004;35:45-51.
52. Davies JE. Mechanism of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
53. Lossdorfer S, Schwartz Z, Wang L, et al. Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 70:361-369.
54. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Bernard JP, Pointaire P. Biological properties of acid etched titanium surface. Effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;15:149-159.
55. Brighton CT, Albelda SM. Identification of integrin cell substratum adhesion receptors on cultured rat bone cells. J Orthop Res 1992;10:766-773.
56. Clover J, Dodds RA, Gowen M. Integrin subunit expression by human osteoblasts and osteoclasts in situ and in culture. J Cell Sci 1992;103:267-271.
57. Hultenby K, Reinholt FP, Heinegard D. Distribution of integrin subunits on rat metaphyseal osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Eur J Cell Biol 1993;62:86-93.
58. Moursi AM, Damsky CH, Lull J, et al. Fibronectin regulates calvarial osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Sci 1996;109:1369-1380.