Experimental Study of Bone Response to a New Surface Treatment of Endosseous Titanium Implants

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 126-131

  Antonio Sanz, R ^a,b,c   Oyarzün, Alejandro ^b   Farias, Daniel ^b   Diaz, Ivan ^b  

^a Oral Implantology   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^c NONE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Bone; Dental implants; Resorbable blast media; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE MONOBASIC; DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE ANHYDROUS; TETRACALCIUM PHOSPHATE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOREMEDIATION; BONE REGENERATION; IMPLANT; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

EID: 0035229994     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buser D, Schenk R, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphogenic study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902.
2. Gross U, Muller-Mai C, Fritz T, et al. Implant surface roughness and mode of load transmission influence periimplant bone structure. Adv Biomater. 1990;9:303-308.
3. Wilke H, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. Advances in Biomaterials. 1990;9:309-314.
4. Martin J, Schwartz Z, Kümmert T, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:389-401.
5. Ledermann P, Schenk R, Buser D. Long lasting osseointegration of immediately loaded, bar connected TPS screw after 12 years of function: A histologic case report of a 95 year old patient. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:552-563.
6. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, et al. A histo-morphometric evaluation of to implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. Clinical Oral Implant Res. 1994;5:202-206.
7. Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hörting-Hansen E, et al. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2- blasted Titanium implants. An experimental study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:77-84.
8. Brunette D. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:231-246.
9. Bobyn J, Pilliar R, Cameron H, et al. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surface metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop. 1980;150:263-270.
10. Hay D, Moreno E. Differential adsorption and chemical affinities for apatitic surfaces. J Dent Res. 1979;58:930-942.
11. Lausmaa J, Mattson L, Rolander U, et al. Chemical composition and morphology of titanium surface oxides. In: Williams J, Nichols M, Zingg W, eds. Biomedical Materials. Pittsburgh: Materials Research Society; 1986:351-359.
12. Sanz A, Farias D, Diaz I, et al. Estudio experimental de la respuesta osea frente a tres diferentes superficies de implantes de titanio Cp, Hay Tps. REVISTA DEL llustre Consejo General de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de España. RCOE 1998 Vol. 3;3:221-226.
13. Baier R. Surface properties influencing biological adhesion. In: Manly R, ed. Adhesion in Biological Systems. New York: Academic Press, 1970:115-148.
14. Boyan BD, Hummert T, Kieswetter K, et al. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials. 1996;17:137-146.
15. Harris A. Tissue culture cells on deformable substrata: Biomechanical implications. J Biomech Eng. 1982;106:19-24.
16. Harris A. Traction and its relations to contraction in tissue cell locomotion. In: Bellairs R, Curtis A, Dunn C, eds. Cell Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982:109-135.
17. Sanz A, Farias D, Diaz I, et al. Estudio experimental de la fuerza de torque de remosion de implantes de Titanio cp, Ha, TPS, y RBM. J Periodoncia y Osteointegración. (in press)
18. Schroder A, Pohjer O, Sutter F. Gewebereaktion auf ein titanholzylinderimplanta mit titanspritzchichtoberflache. Schweitz Moonaatsschhr Zahnheilkd. 1976;86:713-722.
19. Babbush C, Kent J, Misiek D. Titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulouos mandible. J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. 1986;44:274-282.
20. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard J, et al. Long-term evaluation of non submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:161-172.
21. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study on undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11:318-325.
22. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, et al. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567-1575.
23. Martin JY, Schwarttz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomater Res. 1995;29:389-401.
24. Breme J, Wadewitz V, Fürbacher B. Production and mechanical properties of porous sintered specimens of the implant alloy TiAI5Fe2. Advances in Biomaterials. 1990;9:63-68.
25. Albrektsson T, Johanson C. Quantified bone tissue reaction in various metallic materials with reference to the so-called osseointegration concept. In: Davies JE, ed. The Bone Biomaterial Interface, Toronto: Toronto University Press; 1991:357-363.
26. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, et al. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant material in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567-1575.