Do the benefits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure?: A one-year follow-up investigation

Psychology of Sport and Exercise

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 508-518

  Cheon, Sung Hyeon ^a   Reeve, Johnmarshall ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Autonomy support; Motivation; Physical education; Teacher training

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875279550     PISSN: 14690292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aelterman N., Vansteenkiste M., Van Keer H., Van Den Berghe L., Meyer J.D., Haerens L. Students' objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2012, 34:457-480.
2. Assor A., Kaplan H., Kanat-Maymon Y., Roth G. Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: the role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:397-413.
3. Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teaching behaviors predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2002, 27:261-278.
4. Bartholomew K.J., Ntoumanis N., Ryan R., Thøgersen-Ntoumani C. Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: development and initial validation of a psychometric scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2011, 33:75-102.
5. Chatzisarantis N.L., Hagger M.S. Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychology and Health 2009, 24:29-48. 10.1080/08870440701809533.
6. Cheon S.H., Moon I.S. Implementing an autonomy-supportive fitness program to facilitate students' autonomy and engagement. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology 2010, 21:175-195.
7. Cheon S.H., Reeve J., Moon I.S. Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2012, 34:365-396.
8. Deci E.L., Schwartz A., Sheinman L., Ryan R.M. An instrument to assess adult's orientations toward control versus autonomy in children: reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology 1981, 73:642-650. 10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.642.
9. Edmunds N. A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology 2005, 97:444-453. 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.444.
10. Edmunds J., Ntoumanis N., Duda J.L. Testing a self-determination theory-based teaching style intervention in the exercise domain. European Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 38:375-388. 10.1002/ejsp.463.
11. Furrer C., Skinner E.A. Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003, 95:148-162. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.
12. Goudas M., Biddle S., Fox K. Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 1994, 64:453-463.
13. Jang H., Kim E.J., Reeve J. Longitudinal test of self-determination theory's motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104:1175-1188. 10.1037/a0028089.
14. Jang H., Reeve J., Deci E.L. Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102:588-600. 10.1037/a0019682.
15. Jang H., Reeve J., Ryan R.M., Kim A. Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented South Korean adolescents?. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:644-661. 10.1037/a0014241.
16. Jeon, S. (2007). The effects of parents' and teachers' motivating styles on adolescents' school outcomes and psychological well-being: a test of self-determination theory in a Korean context. Unpublished dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
17. McAuley E., Duncan T., Tammen V.V. Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1989, 60:48-58.
18. Moustaka F.C., Vlachopoulos S.P., Kabitsis C., Theodorakis Y. Effects of an autonomy-supportive exercise instructing style on exercise motivation, psychological well-being, and exercise attendance in middle-age women. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2012, 9:139-150.
19. Pelletier L.G., Seguin-Lévesque C., Legault L. Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology 2002, 94:186-196. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01116.x.
20. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S, Cheong Y.F., Congdon R.T, du Toit M. HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling [Computer software] 2011, Scientific Software International, Inc, Lincolnwood, IL.
21. Reeve J. Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist 2009, 44:159-178. 10.1080/00461520903028990.
22. Reeve J., Jang H., Carrell D., Jeon S., Barch J. Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion 2004, 28:147-169.
23. Reeve, J., Lee, W., & Kim, H. Students as architects of their own motivation: changes in engagement produce longitudinal changes in motivation, submitted for publication.
24. Reeve J., Tseng C. Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2011, 36:257-267. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
25. Sameroff A. The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other 2009, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
26. Skinner E.A., Kindermann T.A., Furrer C.J. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2009, 69:493-525. 10.1177/0013164408323233.
27. Standage M., Duda J.L., Ntoumanis N. Students' motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: a self-determination theory approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2006, 77:100-110. 10.5641/027013606X13080769704046.
28. Taylor I.M., Ntoumanis N., Smith N. The social context as a determinant of teacher motivational strategies in physical education. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 2009, 10:235-243.
29. Taylor I.M., Ntoumanis N., Standage M. A self-determination theory approach to understanding the antecedents of teachers' motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2008, 30:75-94.
30. Tessier D., Sarrazin P., Ntoumanis N. The effects of an experimental programme to support students' autonomy on the overt behaviours of physical education teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education 2008, 23:239-253. 10.1007/BF03172998.
31. Tessier D., Sarrazin P., Ntoumanis N. The effect of an intervention to improve newly qualified teachers' interpersonal style, students motivation and psychological need satisfaction in sport-based physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2010, 35:242-253. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.05.005.
32. Vansteenkiste M., Simons J., Soenens B., Lens W. How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy-supportive way. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2004, 26:232-249.
33. Williams G.C., Deci E.L. Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:767-779. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767.
34. Wolters C.A. Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 2004, 96:236-250. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236.