Feature extraction using first and second derivative extrema (FSDE) for real-time and hardware-efficient spike sorting

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 215, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 29-37

  Paraskevopoulou, Sivylla E ^a   Barsakcioglu, Deren Y ^a   Saberi, Mohammed R ^a   Eftekhar, Amir ^a   Constandinou, Timothy G ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Derivatives; Feature extraction; Hardware implementable; Spike sorting

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; EXTRACTION; FIRST AND SECOND DERIVATIVE EXTREMA; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIKE WAVE;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; CALIBRATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTERS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; LINEAR MODELS; NEURAL PROSTHESES; NEURONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84875255484     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abeles M., Goldstein M. Multispike train analysis. Proc IEEE 1977, 65(5):762-773.
2. Balasubramanian K., Obeid I. Fuzzy logic-based spike sorting system. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 198(1):125-134.
3. Buzsáki G., Anastassiou C., Koch C. The origin of extracellular fields and currentsñeeg, ecog, lfp and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012, 13(6):407-420.
4. Buzsáki G., Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 2004, 304(5679):1926-1929.
5. Chan H., Lin M., Wu Y., Lai H., Lee S., Yang J., et al. Detection and characterization of neural spikes. Proc. IET Conference on Advances in Medical, Signal and Information Processing (MEDSIP) 2006, 1-4.
6. Chan H., Wu T., Lee S., Fang S., Chao P., Lin M. Classification of neuronal spikes over the reconstructed phase space. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 168(1):203-211.
7. Constandinou T., Georgiou J., Toumazou C. A fully-integrated semicircular canal processor for an implantable vestibular prosthesis. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) 2008, 81-84.
8. Constandinou T., Georgiou J., Toumazou C. A neural implant asic for the restoration of balance in individuals with vestibular dysfunction. Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2009, 641-644.
9. Dai J., Liu X., Yi Y., Zhang H., Wang J., Zhang S., et al. Experimental study on neuronal spike sorting methods. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking, vol. 2 2008, 230-233.
10. Eftekhar A., Paraskevopoulou S., Constandinou T. Towards a next generation neural interface: optimizing power, bandwidth and data quality. Proc. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 2010, 122-125.
11. Gao H., Walker R., Nuyujukian P., Makinwa K., Shenoy K., Murmann B., et al. Hermese: a 96-channel full data rate direct neural interface in 0.13. IEEE J Solid State Circ 2012, 47(4):1043-1055.
12. Georgiou J., Toumazou C. A 126-μw cochlear chip for a totally implantable system. IEEE J Solid State Circ 2005, 40(2):430-443.
13. Gibson S., Judy J., Markovic D. Comparison of spike-sorting algorithms for future hardware implementation. Proc. IEEE International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS) 2008, 5015-5020.
14. Harris K., Henze D., Csicsvari J., Hirase H., Buzsáki G. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84(1):401-414.
15. Harrison R., Watkins P., Kier R., Lovejoy R., Black D., Greger B., et al. A low-power integrated circuit for a wireless 100-electrode neural recording system. IEEE J Solid State Circ 2007, 42(1):123-133.
16. Humayun M., Weiland J., Fujii G., Greenberg R., Williamson R., Little J., et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 2003, 43(24):2573-2581.
17. Kamboh A., Mason A. Computationally efficient neural feature extraction for spike sorting in implantable high-density recording systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2012.
18. Karkare V., Gibson S., Markovic D. A 130-μw, 64-channel neural spike-sorting dsp chip. IEEE J Solid State Circ 2011, 46(5):1214-1222.
19. Kim S., McNames J. Automatic spike detection based on adaptive template matching for extracellular neural recordings. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 165(2):165-174.
20. Letelier J., Weber P. Spike sorting based on discrete wavelet transform coefficients. J Neurosci Methods 2000, 101(2):93-106.
21. Lian J., Garner G., Muessig D., Lang V. A simple method to quantify the morphological similarity between signals. Signal Process 2010, 90(2):684-688.
22. Mahmud M., Bertoldo A., Girardi S., Maschietto M., Vassanelli S. Sigmate: a Matlab-based automated tool for extracellular neuronal signal processing and analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2012.
23. Maynard E., Nordhausen C., Normann R. The utah intracortical electrode array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 102(3):228-239.
24. Mechler F., Victor J. Dipole characterization of single neurons from their extracellular action potentials. J Computat Neurosci 2012, 32(1):73-100.
25. Paraskevopoulou S., Constandinou T. An ultra-low-power front-end neural interface with automatic gain for uncalibrated monitoring. Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2012, 193-196.
26. Pedreira C., Martinez J., Ison M., Quiroga R. How many neurons can we see with current spike sorting algorithms. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 211:58-65.
27. Perlmutter J., Mink J. Deep brain stimulation. Ann Rev Neurosci 2006, 29:229-257.
28. Pouzat C., Mazor O., Laurent G. Using noise signature to optimize spike-sorting and to assess neuronal classification quality. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 122(1):43-57.
29. Quiroga R. (last accessed: November 2012). 2006. http://www.vis.caltech.edu/rodri/Wave_clus/Wave_clus_home.htm.
30. Quiroga R., Nadasdy Z., Ben-Shaul Y. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput 2004, 16(8):1661-1687.
31. Rodriguez-Perez A., Ruiz-Amaya J., Delgado-Restituto M., Rodriguez-Vazquez A. A low-power programmable neural spike detection channel with embedded calibration and data compression. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ Syst 2012, 6(2):87-100.
32. Stevenson I., Kording K. How advances in neural recording affect data analysis. Nat Neurosci 2011, 14(2):139-142.
33. Wolf P. Thermal considerations for the design of an implanted cortical brain-machine interface (bmi). Indwelling neural implants: strategies for contending with the in vivo environment 2008, pp. 33-38.
34. Xu R., Wunsch D. Clustering algorithms in biomedical research: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2010, 3:120-154.
35. Yang Z., Chen T., Liu W. A neuron signature based spike feature extraction algorithm for on-chip implementation. Proc. IEEE International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS) 2008, 1716-1719.
36. Yang Z., Zhao Q., Liu W. Improving spike separation using waveform derivatives. J Neural Eng 2009, 6(4):2-12.
37. Yuan Y., Yang C., Si J. The m-sorter: an automatic and robust spike detection and classification system. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 210:281-290.
38. Zhang P., Wu J., Zhou Y., Liang P., Yuan J. Spike sorting based on automatic template reconstruction with a partial solution to the overlapping problem. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 135(1):55-65.
39. Zviagintsev A., Perelman Y., Ginosar R. Low power architectures for spike sorting. Proc. IEEE International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS) 2005, 162-165.