Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering

Neural Computation

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1661-1687

  Quiroga, R Quian ^a   Nadasdy, Z ^a   Ben Shaul, Y ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 3042526258     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089976604774201631     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abeles, M., & Goldstein, M. (1977). Multispike train analysis. Proc. IEEE, 65, 762-773.
2. Binder, K., & Heermann, D. W. (1988). Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics: An introduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Blatt, M., Wiseman, S., & Domany, E. (1996). Super-paramagnetic clustering of data. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 3251-3254.
4. Blatt, M., Wiseman, S., & Domany, E. (1997). Data clustering using a model granular magnet. Neural Computation, 9, 1805-1842.
5. Chui, C. (1992). An introduction to wavelets. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Domany, E. (1999). Super-paramagnetic clustering of data: The definitive solution of an ill-posed problem. Physica A, 263, 158-169.
7. Donoho, D., & Johnstone, I. M. (1994). Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 81, 425-455.
8. Fee, M. S., Mitra, P. P., & Kleinfeld, D. (1996). Variability of extracellular spike waveforms of cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol, 76, 3823-3833.
9. Harris, K. D., Henze, D. A., Csicsvari, J., Hirase, H., & Buzsáki, G. (2000). Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J. Neurophysiol, 84, 401-414.
10. Hulata, E., Segev, R., & Ben-Jacob, E. (2002). A method for spike sorting and detection based on wavelet packets and Shannonís mutual information. J. Neurosci. Methods, 117, 1-12.
11. Hulata, E., Segev, R., Shapira, Y., Benveniste, M., & Ben-Jacob, E. (2000). Detections and sorting of neural spikes using wavelet packets. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 4637-4640.
12. Hyvarinen, A., & Oja, E. (2000). Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks, 13, 411-430.
13. Letelier, J. C., & Weber, P. P. (2000). Spike sorting based on discrete wavelet transform coefficients. J. Neurosci. Methods, 101, 93-106.
14. Lewicki, M. (1998). A review of methods for spike sorting: The detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Comput. Neural Syst., 9, R53-R78.
15. Mallat, S. (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell. 2, 674-693.
16. Pouzat, C., Mazor, O., & Laurent, G. (2002). Using noise signature to optimize spike-sorting and to assess neuronal classification quality. J. Neurosci. Methods, 122, 43-57.
17. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Quian Quiroga, R., & Garcia, H. (2003). Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising. Clin. Neurophysiol., 114, 376-390.
19. Quian Quiroga, R., Kraskov, A., Kreuz, T., & Grassberger, P. (2002). Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: A case study on electroen-cephalographic signals. Phys. Rev. E, 65, 041903.
20. Quian Quiroga, R., Sakowicz, O., Basar, E., & Schürmann, M. (2001). Wavelet Transform in the analysis of the frequency composition of evoked potentials. Brain Research Protocols, 8, 16-24.
21. Samar, V. J., Swartz, K. P., & Raghveer, M. R. (1995). Multiresolution analysis of event-related potentials by wavelet decomposition. Brain and Cognition, 27, 398-438.
22. Wolf, U. (1989). Comparison between cluster Monte Carlo algorithms in the Ising spin model. Phys. Lett. B, 228, 379-382.