Selective laser melting-produced porous titanium scaffolds regenerate bone in critical size cortical bone defects

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 792-799

  Van Der Stok, Johan ^a   Van Der Jagt, Olav P ^a   Amin Yavari, Saber ^b   De Haas, Mirthe F P ^a   Waarsing, Jan H ^a   Jahr, Holger ^a   Van Lieshout, Esther M M ^a   Patka, Peter ^a   Verhaar, Jan A N ^a   Zadpoor, Amir A ^b   Weinans, Harrie ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

bone grafting; bone substitute; micro CT; osteoconduction; porous titanium

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; TITANIUM 120; TITANIUM 230; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE PLATE; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HISTOPATHOLOGY; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DISEASES; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; FEMUR; LASERS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TITANIUM; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84875209842     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22293     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D., 2007. Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury 38 (Suppl. 4): S3-S6.
2. Younger EM, Chapman MW., 1989. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 3: 192-195.
3. Damien CJ, Parsons JR., 1991. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes: a review of current technology and applications. J Appl Biomater 2: 187-208.
4. Pneumaticos SG, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Basdra EK, et al. 2010. Segmental bone defects: from cellular and molecular pathways to the development of novel biological treatments. J Cell Mol Med 14: 2561-2569.
5. Van der Stok J, Van Lieshout EM, El-Massoudi Y, et al. 2011. Bone substitutes in the Netherlands-a systematic literature review. Acta Biomater 7: 739-750.
6. Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Medina F, et al. 2010. Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 368: 1999-2032.
7. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim HM, et al. 2004. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials 25: 443-450.
8. Singh R, Lee PD, Lindley TC, et al. 2010. Characterization of the deformation behavior of intermediate porosity interconnected Ti foams using micro-computed tomography and direct finite element modeling. Acta Biomater 6: 2342-2351.
9. Dabrowski B, Swieszkowski W, Godlinski D, et al. 2010. Highly porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 95: 53-61.
10. Vehof JW, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA., 2000. Bone formation in calcium-phosphate-coated titanium mesh. Biomaterials 21: 2003-2009.
11. Daculsi G, Passuti N., 1990. Effect of the macroporosity for osseous substitution of calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials 11: 86-87.
12. Hollander DA, von Walter M, Wirtz T, et al. 2006. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-6Al-4V produced by direct laser forming. Biomaterials 27: 955-963.
13. Spoerke ED, Murray NG, Li H, et al. 2008. Titanium with aligned, elongated pores for orthopedic tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 84: 402-412.
14. Bandyopadhyay A, Krishna BV, Xue W, et al. 2009. Application of laser engineered net shaping (LENS) to manufacture porous and functionally graded structures for load bearing implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20 (Suppl. 1): S29-S34.
15. Heinl P, Muller L, Korner C, et al. 2008. Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater 4: 1536-1544.
16. Ryan G, McGarry P, Pandit A, et al. 2009. Analysis of the mechanical behavior of a titanium scaffold with a repeating unit-cell substructure. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90: 894-906.
17. Xue W, Krishna BV, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. 2007. Processing and biocompatibility evaluation of laser processed porous titanium. Acta Biomater 3: 1007-1018.
18. An YN., 1999. Mechanical properties of bone. In:, An YN, Draughn RA, editors. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. New York: CRC Press, pp 41-63.
19. Biewener AA., 1993. Safety factors in bone strength. Calcif Tissue Int 53 (Suppl. 1): S68-S74.
20. Poelert SL, Campoli G, Van der Stok J, et al. 2012. Relating the microstructure of titanium foam to load distribution and induced bone ingrowth. J. Biomech 45 (Suppl. 1): S334 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0021929012703354.
21. Faria PE, Carvalho AL, Felipucci DN, et al. 2010. Bone formation following implantation of titanium sponge rods into humeral osteotomies in dogs: a histological and histometrical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12: 72-79.
22. Lopez-Heredia MA, Goyenvalle E, Aguado E, et al. 2008. Bone growth in rapid prototyped porous titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 85: 664-673.
23. Pattanayak DK, Fukuda A, Matsushita T, et al. 2011. Bioactive Ti metal analogous to human cancellous bone: fabrication by selective laser melting and chemical treatments. Acta Biomater 7: 1398-1406.
24. Willie BM, Yang X, Kelly NH, et al. 2011. Osseointegration into a novel titanium foam implant in the distal femur of a rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 92: 479-488.
25. Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, et al. 2006. Osteoinductive porous titanium implants: effect of sodium removal by dilute HCl treatment. Biomaterials 27: 2682-2691.
26. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T., 2009. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20 (Suppl. 4): 172-184.
27. Narayanan R, Seshadri SK, Kwon TY, et al. 2008. Calcium phosphate-based coatings on titanium and its alloys. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 85: 279-299.
28. Zhao L, Wang H, Huo K, et al. 2011. Antibacterial nano-structured titania coating incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32: 5706-5716.
29. Cory E, Nazarian A, Entezari V, et al. 2010. Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density. J Biomech 43: 953-960.