Assessing the quality of publications evaluating the accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 253-259

  Thorpe, Gary H ^a  

^a Gary Thorpe Associates Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ACCURACY; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STUDY DESIGN; VALIDITY;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHECKLIST; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84875203570     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0265     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Mahoney J, Ellison J: Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: A critical evaluation of published reports. Clin Chem 2007;53:1122-1128 (Pubitemid 46867530)
2. Mahoney JJ, Ellison JM: Assessing glucose monitor performance - a standardized approach. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007;9:545-552 (Pubitemid 350158796)
3. Baum JM, Pardo SA, Schachner HC, Parkes JL, Simmons DA: Re-evaluating a standard approach to assessing glucose monitor performance. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:323- 325
4. Nichols JH: What is accuracy and how close must the agreement be? Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:558-562 (Pubitemid 40847820)
5. Binette TM, Cembrowski GS: Diverse influences on blood glucose measurements in the ICU setting. Chest 2005;128: 3084-3085
6. ISO 15197 In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems - Requirements for Blood-Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. ISO 15197:2003(E). Geneva: International Standards Organization, 2003
7. ISO/DIS 15197 In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems - Requirements for Blood-Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self- Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. ISO/DIS 15197:2011. Geneva: International Standards Organization, 2011
8. McEnroe RJ, Burritt MF, Powers DM, Rheinheimer DW, Wallace BH: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition. CLSI document EP7- A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2005
9. Chen ET, Nichols JH, Duh SH, Hortin G: Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:749-768 (Pubitemid 37339538)
10. Wehmeier M, Arndt BT, Schumann G, Kuelpmann WR: Evaluation and quality assessment of glucose concentration measurement in blood by point-of-care testing devices. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:888-893
11. Krouwer JS: How to improve total error modeling by accounting for error sources beyond imprecision and bias. Clin Chem 2001;47:1329-1331 (Pubitemid 32579133)
12. Schwartz SL, Taylor E, Ward J, Ng R: Accuracy of four blood glucose monitoring systems. 2008. www.abbottdiabetescare .co.uk/-resources/media/ documents/hcps/clinical-papers/ accuracycomparison-fslite.pdf:1-4 (accessed August 9, 2012).
13. Thomas LE, Kane MP, Bakst G, Busch RS, Hamilton RA, Abelseth JM: A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: The FreeStyle Flash versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10:102-110 (Pubitemid 351232863)
14. Bergenstal R: Accuracy study of blood glucose monitoring systems. 2011. www.prestigesmartsystem.com/idc/pdf/ 10-14-Accuracy-Study.pdf:1-7 (accessed August 9, 2012)
15. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Zschornack E, Kocher S, Tshiananga J, Heister F, Haug C: System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:221-231
16. Mentis N, Vardarli I, Tytko A, Rommel M, Nauck MA: Klinische Performance durch Messgenauigkeit des Blutzuckermessgera ? ts mylife Pura in der Steuerung der intensivierten Insulintherapie bei Patienten mit Typ-1-Diabetes. DDG abstract A-274-0007-00399/poster P303. Poster pre- sentation at the 45th Annual Congress of the German Diabetic Association in Stuttgart, May 12-15, 2010
17. Ng R, Lock JP: Can glucose meters meet tighter accuracy requirements? [abstract]. Diabetologia 2010;53(Suppl 1):418
18. Rao A, Wiley M, Iyengar S, Nadeau D, Carnevale J: Individuals achieve more accurate results with meters that are codeless and employ dynamic electrochemistry. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:145-150
19. Kuo CY, Hsu CT, Ho CS, Su TE, Wu MH, Wang CJ: Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13: 596-600
20. Voulgari C, Tentolouris N: Accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring are relevant to treatment decision-making and clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:723-730
21. Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, Schmid V, Grenningloh M, Forst T, Pfutzner A: Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: A European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:330-337
22. Kristensen GB, Monsen G, Skeie S, Sandberg S: Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10:467-477
23. Bewley B, O'Rahilly S, Tassell R, DuBois J, Donald E: Evaluation of the analytical specificity and clinical application of a new generation hospital-based glucose meter in a dialysis setting. Point of Care 2009;8:61-67
24. Thomas A, Sall S, Roberts C, Drayton M, DuBois J, Clampitt R: An evaluation of the analytical performance of a newgeneration hospital-based glucose meter and an assessment of its clinical reliability in a neonatal care unit. Point of Care 2009;8:68-73
25. Dimeski G, Jones BW, Tilley V, Greenslade MN, Russell AW: Glucose meters: Evaluation of the new formulation measuring strips from Roche (Accu-Chek) and Abbott (Medi- Sense). Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:358-365
26. Warner JV, Wu JY, Buckingham N, McLeod DS, Mottram B, Carter AC: Can one point-of-care glucose meter be used for all pediatric and adult hospital patients? Evaluation of three meters, including recently modified test strips. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:55-62
27. Pfutzner A, Harzer O, Musholt PB, Scherer S, Löbig M, Forst T: Performance of blood glucose measurement systems influenced by interfering substances. Diabetes Stoffwechsel Herz 2009;18:387-392
28. Musholt PB, Schipper C, Thomé N, Ramljak S, Schmidt M, Forst T, Pfutzner A: Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for haematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011;5:1167-1175
29. O'Kane M, McCloskey M, Diver-Hall C: How accurate are blood glucose meters used for patient self testing? Poster presentation at the 47th Annual Meeting of the European Society for the Study of Diabetes in Lisbon, September 12-16, 2011
30. Nerhus K, Rustad P, Sandberg S: Effect of ambient temperature on analytical performance of self-monitoring blood glucose systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:883-892
31. Schöndorf T, Forst T, Pfutzner A: Interferents in glucose determination do not influence the hospital POC glucose meter StatStrip in accuracy and precision of blood glucose measurement [abstract 0966]. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49(Special Suppl):S687
32. Twomey PJ: Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:752-754 (Pubitemid 38901492)
33. Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS: A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:75-83