What is accuracy and how close must the agreement be?

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 558-562

  Nichols, James H ^a,b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BAYSTATE HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DEVICE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EMERGENCY WARD; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NOTE; PHOTOMETRY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYSICIANS; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 20544458073     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.558     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1999.
2. Burnett RW, D'Orazio P, Fogh-Andersen N, Kuwa K, Kulpmann WR, Larsson L, Lewnstam A, Maas AH, Mager G, Spichiger-Keller U, for the Scientific Division, Working Group on Selective Electrodes: IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose. Clin Chim Acta 2001;307:205-209.
3. Larsson-Conn U: Differences between capillary and venous blood glucose during oral glucose tolerance tests. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1976;36:805-808.
4. Chan AYW, Swaminathan R, Cockram CS: Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood. Clin Chem 1989;35:315-317.
5. Weissman M, Klein B: Evaluation of glucose determinations in untreated serum samples. Clin Chem 1958;4:420-422.
6. Hannestad U, Lundblad A: Accurate and precise isotope dilution mass spectrometry method for determining glucose in whole blood. Clin Chem 1997; 43:794-800.
7. Skeie S, Thue G, Nerhus K, Sandberg S: Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: Comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician. Clin Chem 2002;48:994-1003.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
9. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL: Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:622-628.
10. Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox CJ, Clarke WL: Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: Continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1922-1928.
11. American Diabetes Association: Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:95-99.
12. American Diabetes Association: Self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1994;17:81-86.
13. Canadian Standards Association: Performance Specifications for Portable Whole Blood Glucose Monitor Systems for Use in Diabetes Management. CSA Z316.4-94. Mississauga, ON: Canadian Standards Association, 1994.
14. International Organization for Standardization: Determination of Performance Criteria for In Vitro Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Management of Human Diabetes Mellitus. ISO/TC212/DIS 15197. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2000.
15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices: Review Criteria for Assessment of Portable Invasive Blood Glucose Monitoring In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Which Use Glucose Oxidase, Dehydrogenase, or Hexokinase Methodology. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 1998.
16. NCCLS: Ancillary (Bedside) Blood Glucose Testing in Acute and Chronic Care Facilities; Approved Guideline C30-A. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 1994.
17. TNO Center for Medical Technology: Quality Guideline for Non-Implantable Portable Blood Glucose Monitors for Self-Monitoring. TNO-MT/90.021E. Leyden, The Netherlands: TNO Center for Medical Technology, 1991.
18. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social: Reactive Strip Assessment Protocol for Determination of Glucose in Blood. Mexico City: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 1998.
19. Chen ET, Nichols JH, Duh SH, Hortin G: Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:749-768.
20. Boyd JC, Bruns DE: Quality specifications for glucose meters: Assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem 2001;47:209-214.
21. Zerr KJ, Furnary AP, Grunkemeier GL, Bookin S, Kanhere V, Starr A: Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:356-361.