Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 596-600

  Kuo, Chih Yi ^a,b   Hsu, Cheng Teng ^c   Ho, Cheng Shiao ^c   Su, Ting En ^c   Wu, Ming Hsun ^d   Wang, Chau Jong ^b,e  

^a Tai An Hospital   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c Department of Core Technical Research   (Taiwan)

^d MIN SHENG GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; DIABETES MELLITUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY CONTROL; REAGENT STRIPS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955557642     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2010.0223     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Klonoff DC: Regulatory controversies surround blood glucose monitoring devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4: 231-235.
2. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R: Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-1367.
3. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, Bellomo R, Cook D, Dodek P, Henderson WR, Hébert PC, Heritier S, Heyland DK, McArthur C, McDonald E, Mitchell I, Myburgh JA, Norton R, Potter J, Robinson BG, Ronco JJ: Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1283-1297.
4. Wiener RS, Wiener DC, Larson RJ: Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:933-944.
5. Klonoff DC: The Food and Drug Administration is now preparing to establish tighter performance requirements for blood glucose monitors. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4: 499-504.
6. Hsu CT, Hsiao HC, Lee MS, Chang SF, Lee TC, Tsai YS, Zen JM: Assessing the quality of Bionime self-monitoring blood glucose system Rightest GM110: a critical evaluation of interference and ambient circumstances. Clin Chim Acta 2009;402:119-123.
7. Karon BS, Griesmann L, Scott R, Bryant SC, Dubois JA, Shirey TL, Presti S, Santrach PJ: Evaluation of the impact of hematocrit and other interference on the accuracy of hospitalbased glucose meters. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10: 111-120. (Pubitemid 351230287)
8. DIN EN ISO 15197: In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems Requirements for Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus (ISO 15179: 2003). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
9. Ginsberg BH: Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:903-913.
10. Boyd JC, Bruns DE: Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem 2001;47:209-214. (Pubitemid 32142918)