Constructive, collaborative, contextual, and self-directed learning in surface anatomy education

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 114-124

  Bergman, Esther M ^a,b   Sieben, Judith M ^c   Smailbegovic, Ida ^c   de Bruin, Anique B H ^a   Scherpbier, Albert J J A ^c   van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anatomy education; Anatomy teaching; Best evidence medical education; Gross anatomy education; Learning principles; Living anatomy; Problem based learning; Surface anatomy

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ART; ATTITUDE; COMPREHENSION; COOPERATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EVALUATION STUDY; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ANATOMY; ART; ATTITUDE; COMPREHENSION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 84875052770     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1306     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aggarwal R, Brough H, Ellis H.2006.Medical student participation in surface anatomy classes.Clin Anat 19:627-631.
2. Albanese MA, Mitchell S.1993.Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues.Acad Med 68:52-81.
3. Azer SA.2012.Can "YouTube" help students in learning surface anatomy?Surg Radiol Anat 34:465-468.
4. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK.2002.The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics.Anat Rec 269:20-32.
5. Barrows HS, Patek PR, Abrahamson S.1968.Introduction of the living human body in freshman gross anatomy.Br J Med Educ 2:33-35.
6. BEME Group.2000.Best evidence medical education (BEME): Report of meeting 3-5 December 1999, London, UK.Med Teach 22:242-245.
7. Bergman EM, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ.2011.Why don't they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review.Med Teach 33:403-409.
8. Chinnah TI, de Bere SR, Collett T.2011.Students' views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy.Med Teach 33:e27-e36.
9. Cody J.1995.Painting anatomy on anatomy.J Biocommun 22:14-17.
10. Collett T, Kirvell D, Nakorn A, McLachlan JC.2009.The role of living models in the teaching of surface anatomy: Some experiences from a UK medical school.Med Teach 31:e90-e96.
11. Collins JP.2008.Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy.BMJ 337:a1310.
12. Colliver JA.2000.Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory.Acad Med 75:259-266.
13. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG.2008.Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education.Med Educ 42:128-133.
14. Dochy F, Segers M, Bossche PV, Gijbels D.2003.Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis.Learn Instruct 13:533-568.
15. Dolmans DH, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP.2005.Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research.Med Educ 39:732-741.
16. Ellis H.2001.Teaching in the dissecting room.Clin Anat 14:149-151.
17. Ertmer PA, Newby TJ.1993.Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features form an instructional design perspective.Perform Improv Q 6:50-72.
18. Findlater GS, Kristmundsdottir F, Parson SH, Gillingwater TH.2012.Development of a supported self-directed learning approach for anatomy education.Anat Sci Educ 5:114-121.
19. Finn GM.2010.Twelve tips for running a successful body painting teaching session.Med Teach 32:887-890.
20. Finn GM, McLachlan JC.2010.A qualitative study of student responses to body painting.Anat Sci Educ 3:33-38.
21. Finn GM, Patten D, McLachlan JC.2010.The impact of wearing scrubs on contextual learning.Med Teach 32:381-384.
22. Finn GM, White PM, Abdelbagi I.2011.The impact of color and role on retention of knowledge: a body-painting study within undergraduate medicine.Anat Sci Educ 4:311-317.
23. Godden DR, Baddeley AD.1975.Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater.Brit J Psychol 66:325-331.
24. Gregory JK, Lachman N, Camp CL, Chen LP, Pawlina W.2009.Restructuring a basic science course for core competencies: An example from anatomy teaching.Med Teach 31:855-861.
25. Griksaitis MJ, Sawdon MA, Finn GM.2012.Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: A comparative study.Anat Sci Educ 5:20-26.
26. Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR.1999.BEME guide no. 1: Best evidence medical education.Med Teach 21:553-562.
27. Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR.2000.Best evidence medical education.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 5:71-90.
28. Koens F, Mann KV, Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT.2005.Analysing the concept of context in medical education.Med Educ 39:1243-1249.
29. Koens F, Ten Cate OT, Custers EJ.2003.Context-dependent memory in a meaningful environment for medical education: In the classroom and at the bedside.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 8:155-165.
30. Kotzé SH, Mole CG, Greyling LM.2012.The translucent cadaver: An evaluation of the use of full body digital X-ray images and drawings in surface anatomy education.Anat Sci Educ 5:287-294.
31. Leonard R, Acland R, Agur A, Blevins C, Cahill D, Collins J, Dalley A, Dolph J, Hagedoorn J, Hoos P, et al.1996.A clinical anatomy curriculum for the medical student of the 21st century: Gross anatomy.Clin Anat 9:71-99.
32. Louw G, Eizenberg N, Carmichael SW.2009.The place of anatomy in medical education: AMEE Guide no 41.Med Teach 31:373-386.
33. Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Norman GR.2006.Innovations in problem-based learning: What can we learn from recent studies?Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 11:403-422.
34. Marks SCJr, Bertman SL, Penney JC.1997.Human anatomy: A foundation for education about death and dying in medicine.Clin Anat 10:118-122.
35. McLachlan JC, Patten D.2006.Anatomy teaching: Ghosts of the past, present and future.Medical Educ 40:243-253.
36. McLachlan JC, White P, Donnelly L, Patten D.2010.Student attitudes to peer physical examination: A qualitative study of changes in expressed willingness to participate.Med Teach 32:e101-e105.
37. McMenamin PG.2008.Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching.Anat Sci Educ 1:139-144.
38. Metcalf NF, Prentice ED, Metcalf WK, Stinson WW.1982.Peer group models in examination instruction as an integral part of medical gross anatomy.J Med Educ 57:641-644.
39. Monkhouse WS.1992.Anatomy and the medical school curriculum.Lancet 340:834-835.
40. Neville AJ, Norman GR.2007.PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: Three iterations in three decades.Acad Med 82:370-374.
41. Norman GR, Schmidt HG.1992.The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence.Acad Med 67:557-565.
42. Norman GR, Schmidt HG.2000.Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts.Med Educ 34:721-728.
43. Older J.2004.Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation.Surgeon 2:79-90.
44. Op Den Akker JW, Bohnen A, Oudegeest WJ, Hillen B.2002.Giving color to a new curriculum: Bodypaint as a tool in medical education.Clin Anat 15:356-362.
45. Patten D.2007.What lies beneath: The use of three-dimensional projection in living anatomy teaching.Clin Teach 4:10-14.
46. Raftery AT.2007.Anatomy teaching in the UK.Surgery 25:1-2.
47. Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC.2004.Exploring medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination.Med Teach 26:86-88.
48. Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Sato TJ.2009.Medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination: Findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14:103-121.
49. Rizzolo LJ.2002.Human dissection: An approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education.Anat Rec 269:242-248.
50. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR.1992.A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.Ann Emerg Med 21:384-390.
51. Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA, Johns C, Worthington JR.1994.Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.JAMA 271:827-832.
52. Stillman PL, Ruggill JS, Sabers DL.1978.The use of live models in the teaching of gross anatomy.Med Educ 12:114-116.
53. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A.2010.The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization.Anat Sci Educ 3:83-93.
54. Tynjälä P.1999.Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university.Int J Educ Res 31:357-442.
55. van der Vleuten CP, Dolmans DH, Scherpbier AJ.2000.The need for evidence in education.Med Teach 22:246-250.
56. Vernon DT, Blake RL.1993.Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research.Acad Med 68:550-563.
57. Wearn AM, Rees CE, Bradley P, Vnuk AK.2008.Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework.Med Educ 42:1218-1226.
58. Wolf FM.2000.Lessons to be learned from evidence-based medicine: Practice and promise of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based education.Med Teach 22:251-259.