Concreteness and word production

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 365-377

  Hanley, J Richard ^a   Hunt, Rebecka P ^a   Steed, Deborah A ^a   Jackman, Shannon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Concreteness effect; Tip of the tongue states; Word production

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

ADULT; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875045378     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0266-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 64-88.
2. Bormann, T., Kulke, F., Wallesch, C. W., & Blanken, G. (2008). Omissions and semantic errors in aphasic naming; Is there a link? Brain and Language, 104, 24-32.
3. Brown, A. S. (2012). The tip of the tongue state. Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press.
4. Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2004). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 21-24.
5. Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132, 163-201. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 132. 2. 163.
6. Crutch, S. J., Connell, S., & Warrington, E. K. (2009). The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and conceptual knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1377-1390. doi: 10. 1080/17470210802483834.
7. Crutch, S. J., & Jackson, E. C. (2011). Contrasting graded effects of semantic similarity and association across the concreteness spectrum. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1388-1408.
8. Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128, 615-627.
9. Dell, G., Lawler, E., Harris, H., & Gordon, J. (2004). Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 125-145. doi: 10. 1080/02643290342000320.
10. Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 182-216.
11. Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 817-855.
12. Gollan, T. H., & Brown, A. S. (2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 135, 462-483. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 135. 3. 462.
13. Hanley, J. R. (2011). Why are names of people associated with so many phonological retrieval failures? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 612-617. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-011-0082-0.
14. Hanley, J. R., Dell, G. A., Kay, J., & Baron, R. (2004). Evidence for the involvement of a nonlexical route in the repetition of familiar words; A comparison of single and dual route models of auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 147-158.
15. Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1997). An effect of imageability on the production of phonological errors in auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 1065-1084.
16. Hanley, J. R., & Turner, J. M. (2000). Why are familiar-only experiences more frequent for voices than for faces? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1105-1116.
17. Heine, M. K., Ober, B. A., & Shenaut, G. K. (1999). Naturally occurring and experimenter induced tip-of-the-tongue experiences in three adult age groups. Psychology and Aging, 14, 445-457.
18. Hoffman, P., Rogers, T. T., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Semantic diversity accounts for the "missing" word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: Insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2432-2446. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2011. 21614.
19. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434-446. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2007. 11. 007.
20. Johnston, R. A., Dent, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Barry, C. (2010). British-English norms and naming times for a set of 539 pictures: The role of age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 461-469. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 42. 2. 461.
21. Jones, G. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication. Brain and Language, 24, 1-19.
22. Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the frequency effect in word production? Insights from aphasic picture naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463-492.
23. Laine, M., Tikkala, A., & Juhola, M. (1998). Modelling anomia by the discrete two-stage word production architecture. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 275-294.
24. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38. disc. 38-75.
25. Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20, 715-726.
26. Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 65-79.
27. Newton, P. K., & Barry, C. (1997). Concreteness effects in word production but not word comprehension in deep dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 481-509.
28. Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 1-33.
29. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Perfect, T. J., & Hanley, J. R. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Do experimenter-presented interlopers have any effect? Cognition, 45, 55-75. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0277(92)90023-B.
31. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 377-500.
32. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82-102. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 9. 1. 82.
33. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (2011). Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Retrieval, behavior, and experience. Memory & Cognition, 39, 737-749. doi: 10. 3758/s13421-010-0066-8.