Designing implant surface topography for improved biocompatibility

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 257-267

  Harvey, Alison G ^a   Hill, Ernie W ^a   Bayat, Ardeshir ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; biomimetics; breast implant; cell surface interaction; implants

Indexed keywords

BREAST IMPLANTS; CELL-SURFACE INTERACTIONS; DEGREE OF CONTROL; DESIGN STRATEGIES; FOREIGN BODY REACTIONS; PROTEIN ORIENTATION; TISSUE RESPONSE; TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES;

BIOMIMETICS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TISSUE;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY;

ADHESION; ADSORPTION; BINDING SITE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL FUNCTION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURFACE; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IMPLANT; IMPLANT SURFACE; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REVIEW; ROUGHNESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84874920134     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erd.12.82     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Castner DG, Ratner BD. Biomedical surface science: foundations to frontiers. Surface Science 500(1-3), 28-60 (2002).
2. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Dalby MJ. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine 6(5), 619-633 (2010).
3. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 20(2), 86-100 (2008).
4. Jarvis RA, Bryers JD. Effects of controlled fibronectin surface orientation on subsequent Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 75(1), 41-55 (2005).
5. Ratner BD. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, MA, USA (2004).
6. Wertz CF, Santore MM. Effect of surface hydrophobicity on adsorption and relaxation kinetics of albumin and fibrinogen: single-species and competitive behavior. Langmuir 17(10), 3006-3016 (2001).
7. Grinnell F, Feld MK. Fibronectin adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces detected by antibody binding and analyzed during cell adhesion in serumcontaining medium. J. Biol. Chem. 257(9), 4888-4893 (1982).
8. Lu DR, Park K. Effect of surface hydrophobicity on the conformational changes of adsorbed fibrinogen. J. Colloid & Interface Sci. 144(1), 271-281 (1991).
9. Michael KE, Vernekar VN, Keselowsky BG, Meredith JC, Latour RA, Garcãa ASJ. Adsorption-induced conformational changes in fibronectin due to interactions with well-defined surface chemistries. Langmuir 19(19), 8033-8040 (2003).
10. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, García AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 66(2), 247-259 (2003).
11. Kang IK, Ito Y, Sisido M, Imanishi Y. Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on polypeptide derivatives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23(2), 223-239 (1989).
12. Tamada Y, Ikada Y. Fibroblast growth on polymer surfaces and biosynthesis of collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28(7), 783-789 (1994).
13. van Wachem PB, Hogt AH, Beugeling T et al. Adhesion of cultured human endothelial cells onto methacrylate polymers with varying surface wettability and charge. Biomaterials 8(5), 323-328 (1987).
14. Magnus B, Jan C, Sven O. Surface-dependent conformations of human plasma fibronectin adsorbed to silica, mica, and hydrophobic surfaces, studied with use of atomic force microscopy. J. Biomed. Materials Res. 64A(2), 349-356 (2003).
15. Lee MH, Ducheyne P, Lynch L, Boettiger D, Composto RJ. Effect of biomaterial surface properties on fibronectin-α5β1 integrin interaction and cellular attachment. Biomaterials 27(9), 1907-1916 (2006).
16. Vroman L. Effect of absorbed proteins on the wettability of hydrophilic and hydrophobic solids. Nature 196, 476-477 (1962).
17. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. Biomaterials 25(23), 5415-5422 (2004).
18. O'Neill C, Jordan P, Riddle P, Ireland G. Narrow linear strips of adhesive substratum are powerful inducers of both growth and total focal contact area. J. Cell. Sci. 95 (Pt 4), 577-586 (1990).
19. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276(5317), 1425-1428 (1997).
20. Altankov G, Grinnell F, Groth T. Studies on the biocompatibility of materials: fibroblast reorganization of substratumbound fibronectin on surfaces varying in wettability. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30(3), 385-391 (1996).
21. Baneyx G, Baugh L, Vogel V. Fibronectin extension and unfolding within cell matrix fibrils controlled by cytoskeletal tension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99(8), 5139-5143 (2002).
22. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7(4), 265-275 (2006).
23. Baleani M, Viceconti M, Toni A. The effect of sandblasting treatment on endurance properties of titanium alloy hip prostheses. Artif. Organs 24(4), 296-299 (2000).
24. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 20(23-24), 2311-2321 (1999). • Pits create a 3D environment for cells to occupy, closely resembling the in vivo environment.
25. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20(Suppl. 4), 172-184 (2009).
26. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 27(15), 2980-2987 (2006).
27. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 27(8), 1306-1315 (2006).
28. Zapanta CM, Griffith JW, Hess GD et al. Microtextured materials for circulatory support devices: preliminary studies. ASAIO J. 52(1), 17-23 (2006).
29. Goodman SL, Sims PA, Albrecht RM. Three-dimensional extracellular matrix textured biomaterials. Biomaterials 17(21), 2087-2095 (1996).
30. Carpenter J, Khang D, Webster TJ. Nanometer polymer surface features: the influence on surface energy, protein adsorption and endothelial cell adhesion. Nanotechnology 19(50), 505103 (2008).
31. Lampin M, Warocquier-Clérout, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 36(1), 99-108 (1997).
32. Toworfe GK, Composto RJ, Adams CS, Shapiro IM, Ducheyne P. Fibronectin adsorption on surface-activated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and its effect on cellular function. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 71(3), 449-461 (2004).
33. Chen H, Song W, Zhou F et al. The effect of surface microtopography of poly(dimethylsiloxane) on protein adsorption, platelet and cell adhesion. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 71(2), 275-281 (2009).
34. Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 117(7), 2182-2190 (2006).
35. Prasad BR, Brook MA, Smith T et al. Controlling cellular activity by manipulating silicone surface roughness. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 78(2), 237-242 (2010).
36. Weiss P. Experiments on cell and axon orientation in vitro: the role of colloidal exudates in tissue organization. J. Experimental Zool. 100(3), 353-386 (1945).
37. Weiss P. Cell contact. In: International Review of Cytology. Bourne GH, Danielli JF (Eds). Academic Press, MA, USA, 391-423 (1958).
38. Barr S, Hill E, Bayat A. Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility. Eplasty 9, e22 (2009).
39. Chen S, Jones JA, Xu Y, Low HY, Anderson JM, Leong KW. Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model. Biomaterials 31(13), 3479-3491 (2010).
40. van Kooten TG, Whitesides JF, von Recum A. Influence of silicone (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 43(1), 1-14 (1998).
41. den Braber ET, de Ruijter JE, Smits HT, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29(4), 511-518 (1995).
42. den Braber ET, de Ruijter JE, Smits HT, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Quantitative analysis of cell proliferation and orientation on substrata with uniform parallel surface micro-grooves. Biomaterials 17(11), 1093-1099 (1996).
43. den Braber ET, de Ruijter JE, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Biomaterials 17(21), 2037-2044 (1996).
44. Braber ETD, Ruijter JED, Ginsel LA, Recum AFV, Jansen JA. Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 40(2), 291-300 (1998).
45. Uttayarat P, Toworfe GK, Dietrich F, Lelkes PI, Composto RJ. Topographic guidance of endothelial cells on silicone surfaces with micro- to nano-grooves: orientation of actin filaments and focal adhesions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 75(3), 668-680 (2005).
46. Oakley C, Brunette DM. The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. J. Cell. Sci. 106 (Pt 1), 343-354 (1993).
47. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Yarwood SJ, Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS. Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a microgrooved topography. Exp. Cell Res. 284(2), 274-282 (2003).
48. Berry CC, Campbell G, Spadiccino A, Robertson M, Curtis AS. The influence of microscale topography on fibroblast attachment and motility. Biomaterials 25(26), 5781-5788 (2004).
49. Mata A, Hsu L, Capito R, Aparicio C, Henrikson K, Stupp SI. Micropatterning of bioactive self-assembling gels. Soft Matter 5(6), 1228-1236 (2009).
50. Dalby MJ, Berry CC, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 295(2), 387-394 (2004).
51. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS. Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36(10), 2005-2015 (2004).
52. Pérez-Garnes M, González-García C, Moratal D, Rico P, Salmerón-Sánchez M. Fibronectin distribution on demixed nanoscale topographies. Int. J. Artif. Organs 34(1), 54-63 (2011).
53. González-García C, Sousa SR, Moratal D, Rico P, Salmerón-Sánchez M. Effect of nanoscale topography on fibronectin adsorption, focal adhesion size and matrix organisation. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 77(2), 181-190 (2010).
54. Green AM, Jansen JA, van der Waerden JP, von Recum AF. Fibroblast response to microtextured silicone surfaces: texture orientation into or out of the surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28(5), 647-653 (1994).
55. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Herzyk P, Agheli H, Sutherland DS, Wilkinson CDW. Group analysis of regulation of fibroblast genome on low-adhesion nanostructures. Biomaterials 28(10), 1761-1769 (2007).
56. Singhvi R, Kumar A, Lopez GP et al. Engineering cell shape and function. Science 264(5159), 696-698 (1994).
57. Wood MA, Bagnaninchi P, Dalby MJ. The β integrins and cytoskeletal nanoimprinting. Exp. Cell Res. 314(4), 927-935 (2008).
58. Dalby MJ. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med. Eng. Phys. 27(9), 730-742 (2005).
59. Sanz-Herrera JA, Moreo P, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M. On the effect of substrate curvature on cell mechanics. Biomaterials 30(34), 6674-6686 (2009).
60. Yamamoto S, Tanaka M, Sunami H et al. Relationship between adsorbed fibronectin and cell adhesion on a honeycomb-patterned film. Surface Science 600(18), 3785-3791 (2006).
61. Smeal RM, Tresco PA. The influence of substrate curvature on neurite outgrowth is cell type dependent. Exp. Neurol. 213(2), 281-292 (2008).
62. Nikkhah M, Strobl JS, Agah M. Attachment and response of human fibroblast and breast cancer cells to three dimensional silicon microstructures of different geometries. Biomed. Microdevices 11(2), 429-441 (2009).
63. Roach P, Farrar D, Perry CC. Surface tailoring for controlled protein adsorption: effect of topography at the nanometer scale and chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(12), 3939-3945 (2006).
64. Chou SY, Cheng CM, LeDuc PR. Composite polymer systems with control of local substrate elasticity and their effect on cytoskeletal and morphological characteristics of adherent cells. Biomaterials 30(18), 3136-3142 (2009).
65. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86(1 Pt 1), 617-628 (2004).
66. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 20(6), 573-588 (1999).
67. Soofi SS, Last JA, Liliensiek SJ, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. The elastic modulus of Matrigel as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 167(3), 216-219 (2009).
68. Oláh A, Hillborg H, Vancso GJ. Hydrophobic recovery of UV/ozone treated poly(dimethylsiloxane): adhesion studies by contact mechanics and mechanism of surface modification. Applied Surface Science 239(3-4), 410-423 (2005).
69. Ouyang M, Yuan C, Muisener RJ, Boulares A, Koberstein JT. Conversion of some siloxane polymers to silicon oxide by UV/ozone photochemical processes. Chemistry of Materials 12(6), 1591-1596 (2000).
70. Hettlich HJ, Otterbach F, Mittermayer C, Kaufmann R, Klee D. Plasma-induced surface modifications on silicone intraocular lenses: chemical analysis and in vitro characterization. Biomaterials 12(5), 521-524 (1991).
71. Khorasani MT, Mirzadeh H, Sammes PG. Laser surface modification of polymers to improve biocompatibility: HEMA grafted PDMS, in vitro assay-III. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 55(5-6), 685-689 (1999).
72. Khorasani MT, Mirzadeh H. Laser surface modification of silicone rubber to reduce platelet adhesion in vitro. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 15(1), 59-72 (2004).
73. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbassi F, Maestri M, Bianchi R, Zonta A. The characterization of plasma-modified polydimethylsiloxane interfaces with media of different surface energy. Clin. Mater. 5(2-4), 147-156 (1990).
74. Rico P, Rodríguez Hernández JC, Moratal D, Altankov G, Monleón Pradas M, Salmerón-Sánchez M. Substrate-induced assembly of fibronectin into networks: influence of surface chemistry and effect on osteoblast adhesion. Tissue Eng. Part A 15(11), 3271-3281 (2009).
75. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, García AJ. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(17), 5953-5957 (2005).
76. Blit PH, Shen YH, Ernsting MJ, Woodhouse KA, Santerre JP. Bioactivation of porous polyurethane scaffolds using fluorinated RGD surface modifiers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 94(4), 1226-1235 (2010).
77. Massia SP, Stark J. Immobilized RGD peptides on surface-grafted dextran promote biospecific cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 56(3), 390-399 (2001).
78. Li B, Chen J, Wang JH. RGD peptideconjugated poly(dimethylsiloxane) promotes adhesion, proliferation, and collagen secretion of human fibroblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 79(4), 989-998 (2006).
79. Zourob M, Gough JE, Ulijn RV. A micropatterned hydrogel platform for chemical synthesis and biological analysis. Advanced Materials 18(5), 655-659 (2006).
80. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials 24(24), 4385-4415 (2003).
81. Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 697-715 (1996).
82. Todd SJ, Farrar D, Gough JE, Ulijn RV. Enzyme-triggered cell attachment to hydrogel surfaces. Soft Matter 3(5), 547-550 (2007).
83. Britland S, Perridge C, Denyer M, Morgan H, Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Morphogenetic guidance cues can interact synergistically and hierarchically in steering nerve cell growth. Experimental Biology Online 1(2), 1-15 (1997).
84. McNally AK, Jones JA, Macewan SR, Colton E, Anderson JM. Vitronectin is a critical protein adhesion substrate for IL-4-induced foreign body giant cell formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 86(2), 535-543 (2008).
85. Ulijn RV, Bibi N, Jayawarna V et al. Bioresponsive hydrogels. Materials Today 10(4), 40-48 (2007).
86. Mart RJ, Osborne RD, Stevens MM, Ulijn RV. Peptide-based stimuli-responsive biomaterials. Soft Matter 2(10), 822-835 (2006).