Bioactivation of porous polyurethane scaffolds using fluorinated RGD surface modifiers

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1226-1235

  Blit, Patrick H ^a,b   Shen, Yi Hao ^a   Ernsting, Mark J ^a,b   Woodhouse, Kimberly A ^a,b,c   Santerre, J Paul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Polyurethanes; Porous scaffolds; RGD peptide; Surface modification; Surface modifying additives

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVATION; BIOMATERIAL SCAFFOLDS; BULK MATERIALS; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL NUMBER; COVALENT ATTACHMENT; FLUORINATED SURFACE MODIFIERS; POLYMER SUBSTRATE; POLYMER-AIR INTERFACES; POLYURETHANE MATERIALS; POLYURETHANE SCAFFOLDS; POROUS SCAFFOLD; POROUS STRUCTURES; RAT AORTIC SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS; REACTION CHEMISTRY; RGD PEPTIDE; SURFACE MODIFICATION; SURFACE MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES; SURFACE MODIFIERS; SURFACE-MODIFYING; SURFACE-MODIFYING ADDITIVES; SYNTHETIC SCAFFOLDS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); TWO PHOTON; UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION;

ADHESION; BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BLENDING; CELL ADHESION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MUSCLE; PEPTIDES; POLYMER BLENDS; POLYURETHANES; SCAFFOLDS; SEEPAGE; SOIL MECHANICS; SURFACE REACTIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SURFACES;

ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; BIOACTIVE FLUORINATED SURFACE MODIFIER; FLUORINE; POLYURETHAN; POROUS POLYMER; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTACT ANGLE; MUSCLE CELL; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; RAT; SMOOTH MUSCLE;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL SURVIVAL; FLUORINE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MYOCYTES, SMOOTH MUSCLE; OLIGOPEPTIDES; POLYURETHANES; POROSITY; RATS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 77956486430     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32804     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Massia SP, Hubbell JA. Covalently attached GRGD on polymer surfaces promotes biospecific adhesion of mammalian cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990;589:261-270.
2. Amiji M, Park K. Surface modification of polymeric biomaterials with poly(ethylene oxide), albumin, and heparin for reduced thrombogenicity. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1993;4:217-234.
3. Gabriel M, Amerongen GP, Van Hinsbergh VW, Amerongen AV, Zentner A. Direct grafting of RGD-motif-containing peptide on the surface of polycaprolactone films. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2006;17:567-577.
4. Al-Munajjed AA, O'brien FJ. Influence of a novel calcium-phosphate coating on the mechanical properties of highly porous collagen scaffolds for bone repair. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009;2:138-146.
5. Jiang T, Abdel-Fattah WI, Laurencin CT. In vitro evaluation of chitosan/ poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) sintered microsphere scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006;27:4894-4903.
6. Lin AS, Barrows TH, Cartmell SH, Guldberg RE. Microarchitectural and mechanical characterization of oriented porous polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 2003;24:481-489.
7. Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, Derfoul A, Danielson KG, Hall DJ, Tuan RS. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2005;26:599-609. (Pubitemid 38988302)
8. Woodfield TB, Malda J, De Wijn J, Peters F, Riesle J, Van Blitterswijk CA. Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 2004;25:4149-4161.
9. Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Sacks MS, Wagner WR. Preparation and characterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications. Biomaterials 2005;26:3961-3971.
10. Yang J, Motlagh D, Webb AR, Ameer GA. Novel biphasic elastomeric scaffold for small-diameter blood vessel tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2005;11:1876-1886.
11. Roh JD, Nelson GN, Brennan MP, Mirensky TL, Yi T, Hazlett T, Tellides G, Sinusas AJ, Pober JS, Saltzman WM, Kyriakides TR, Breuer CK. Small-diameter biodegradable scaffolds for functional vascular tissue engineering in the mouse model. Biomaterials 2008;29:1454-1463.
12. Lan PX, Lee JW, Seol YJ, Cho DW. Development of 3D PPF/DEF scaffolds using micro-stereolithography and surface modification. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20:271-279.
13. Casper CL, Yamaguchi N, Kiick KL, Rabolt JF. Functionalizing electrospun fibers with biologically relevant macromolecules. Biomacromolecules 2005;6:1998-2007.
14. Zhang H, Lin CY, Hollister SJ. The interaction between bone marrow stromal cells and RGD-modified three-dimensional porous polycaprolactone scaffolds. Biomaterials 2009;30:4063-4069.
15. Croll TI, O'connor AJ, Stevens GW, Cooper-White JJ. Controllable surface modification of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) by hydrolysis or aminolysis I: Physical, chemical, and theoretical aspects. Biomacromolecules 2004;5:463-473.
16. Hacker M, Tessmar J, Neubauer M, Blaimer A, Blunk T, Gopferich A, Schulz MB. Towards biomimetic scaffolds: Anhydrous scaffold fabrication from biodegradable amine-reactive diblock copolymers. Biomaterials 2003;24:4459-4473. (Pubitemid 36960141)
17. Hern DL, Hubbell JA. Incorporation of adhesion peptides into nonadhesive hydrogels useful for tissue resurfacing. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:266-276.
18. Borkenhagen M, Clemence JF, Sigrist H, Aebischer P. Three-dimensional extracellular matrix engineering in the nervous system. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:392-400.
19. Liu X, Won Y, Ma PX. Surface modification of interconnected porous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:84-91.
20. Safinia L, Wilson K, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A. Through-thickness plasma modification of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable porous polymer constructs. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;87:632-642.
21. Yang J, Wan Y, Yang J, Bei J, Wang S. Plasma-treated, collagen-anchored polylactone: Its cell affinity evaluation under shear or shear-free conditions. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1139-1147.
22. Tang YW, Santerre JP, Labow RS, Taylor DG. Use of surface-modifying macromolecules to enhance the biostability of segmented polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:371-381.
23. Ward RS. Surface modifying additives for biomaterial polymers. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1989;8:22-25.
24. Ernsting MJ, Bonin GC, Yang M, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Generation of cell adhesive substrates using peptide fluoralkyl surface modifiers. Biomaterials 2005;26:6536-6546.
25. Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E. Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature 1984;309:30-33. (Pubitemid 14134132)
26. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: Biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials 2003;24:4385-4415.
27. Ernsting MJ, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Human monocyte adhesion onto RGD and PHSRN peptides delivered to the surface of a polycarbonate polyurethane using bioactive fluorinated surface modifiers. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;83:759-769.
28. Niklason LE, Gao J, Abbott WM, Hirschi KK, Houser S, Marini R, Langer R. Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science 1999;284:489-493.
29. Park IS, Kim SH, Kim YH, Kim IH. A collagen/smooth muscle cellin-corporated elastic scaffold for tissue-engineered vascular grafts. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:1645-1660.
30. Rogers KA, Boughner D, Appleton CT, Appleton AJ. Vascular smooth muscle cells as a valvular interstitial cell surrogate in heart valve tissue engineering. Tissue Eng A 2009;15:3889-3897.
31. Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS, Martin DP, Daebritz S, Mayer JE, Vacanti JP. Evaluation of biodegradable, three-dimensional matrices for tissue engineering of heart valves. Asaio J 2000;46:107-110. (Pubitemid 30062655)
32. Hsu YY, Gresser JD, Trantolo DJ, Lyons CM, Gangadharam PR, Wise DL. Effect of polymer foam morphology and density on kinetics of in vitro controlled release of isoniazid from compressed foam matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:107-116.
33. Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 1990;248:73-76. (Pubitemid 120031438)
34. Williams RM, Piston DW, Webb WW. Two-photon molecular excitation provides intrinsic 3-dimensional resolution for laser-based microscopy and microphotochemistry. FASEB J 1994;8:804-813.
35. Diaspro A, Bianchini P, Vicidomini G, Faretta M, Ramoino P, Usai C. Multi-photon excitation microscopy. Biomed Eng Online 2006;5:36.
36. Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Mueller R, Griffith LG. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 2001;7:557-572.
37. Mcglohorn JB, Holder WD, Grimes LW, Thomas CB, Burg KJ. Evaluation of smooth muscle cell response using two types of porous polylactide scaffolds with differing pore topography. Tissue Eng 2004;10:505-514.
38. Wake MC, Gupta PK, Mikos AG. Fabrication of pliable biodegradable polymer foams to engineer soft tissues. Cell Transplant 1996;5:465-473.
39. Grenier S, Sandig M, Holdsworth DW, Mequanint K. Interactions of coronary artery smooth muscle cells with 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;89:293-303.
40. Namba RM, Cole AA, Bjugstad KB, Mahoney MJ. Development of porous PEG hydrogels that enable efficient, uniform cell-seeding and permit early neural process extension. Acta Biomater 2009;5:1884-1897.
41. Sung HJ, Meredith C, Johnson C, Galis ZS. The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. Biomaterials 2004;25:5735-5742.
42. Kim TG, Park TG. Biomimicking extracellular matrix: Cell adhesive RGD peptide modified electrospun poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mesh. Tissue Eng 2006;12:221-233.
43. Ho MH, Hou LT, Tu CY, Hsieh HJ, Lai JY, Chen WJ, Wang DM. Promotion of cell affinity of porous PLLA scaffolds by immobilization of RGD peptides via plasma treatment. Macromol Biosci 2006;6:90-98.
44. Hu Y, Winn SR, Krajbich I, Hollinger JO. Porous polymer scaffolds surface-modified with arginine-glycine-aspartic acid enhance bone cell attachment and differentiation in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;64:583-590. (Pubitemid 37522499)
45. Yoon JJ, Song SH, Lee DS, Park TG. Immobilization of cell adhesive RGD peptide onto the surface of highly porous biodegradable polymer scaffolds fabricated by a gas foaming/salt leaching method. Biomaterials 2004;25:5613-5620.
46. Mann BK, West JL. Cell adhesion peptides alter smooth muscle cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and matrix protein synthesis on modified surfaces and in polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:86-93.
47. Neff JA, Tresco PA, Caldwell KD. Surface modification for controlled studies of cell-ligand interactions. Biomaterials 1999;20:2377-2393.
48. Cheng G, Youssef BB, Markenscoff P, Zygourakis K. Cell population dynamics modulate the rates of tissue growth processes. Biophys J 2006;90:713-724.
49. Kouvroukoglou S, Dee KC, Bizios R, Mcintire LV, Zygourakis K. Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesive peptides. Biomaterials 2000;21:1725-1733.
50. Gobin AS, West JL. Cell migration through defined, synthetic ECM analogs. FASEB J 2002;16:751-753.
51. Horii A, Wang X, Gelain F, Zhang S. Biological designer self-assembling Peptide nanofiber scaffolds significantly enhance osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and 3-d migration. PLoS ONE 2007;2:e190.