Controlling cellular activity by manipulating silicone surface roughness

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 237-242

  Prasad, Babu R ^a   Brook, Michael A ^b   Smith, Terry ^a   Zhao, Shigui ^b   Chen, Yang ^b   Sheardown, Heather ^b   D'souza, Renita ^b   Rochev, Yuri ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

3T3 fibroblasts; Biocompatibility; Cellular activity; Silicones; Surface topology

Indexed keywords

3T3 FIBROBLASTS; BREAST IMPLANTS; CELLULAR ACTIVITIES; CELLULAR ACTIVITY; FIBROBLAST GROWTH; FIBROUS CAPSULE; FIBROUS CAPSULE FORMATION; GOLD STANDARDS; PER UNIT; PICOGREEN; REVISION SURGERY; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SILICONE SURFACES; SUBMICRON SCALE; SURFACE TOPOLOGY; WOUND HEALING;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; FIBROBLASTS; METAL ANALYSIS; MICROCHANNELS; PHOTORESISTS; PLASTICS; RUBBER; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TISSUE; TOPOLOGY; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

SILICONES;

CELL DNA; DIMETICONE; SILASTIC;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL ASSAY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BREAST IMPLANTS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NIH 3T3 CELLS; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SILICONES; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77952552362     PISSN: 09277765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ratner B.D., et al. Biomaterials Science; An Introduction to Materials in Medicine 2004, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed.
2. Khorasani M.T., Mirzadeh H. BHK cells behaviour on laser treated polydimethylsiloxane surface. Colloids Surf. B Biointerf. 2004, 35(1):67-71.
3. Kidambi S., et al. Cell adhesion on polyelectrolyte multilayer coated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces with varying topographies. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13(8):2105-2117.
4. Lee J.N., et al. Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Langmuir 2004, 20(26):11684-11691.
5. Toworfe G.K., et al. Fibronectin adsorption on surface-activated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and its effect on cellular function. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2004, 71(3):449-461.
6. Li B., Chen J., Wang J.H. RGD peptide-conjugated poly(dimethylsiloxane) promotes adhesion, proliferation, and collagen secretion of human fibroblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 79(4):989-998.
7. Yim E.K., et al. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2005, 26(26):5405-5413.
8. Liao H., et al. Response of rat osteoblast-like cells to microstructured model surfaces in vitro. Biomaterials 2003, 24(4):649-654.
9. Kyriakides T.R., et al. Mice that lack the angiogenesis inhibitor, thrombospondin 2, mount an altered foreign body reaction characterized by increased vascularity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96(8):4449-4454.
10. McLucas E., et al. An investigation into the effect of surface roughness of stainless steel on human umbilical vein endothelial cell gene expression. Endothelium 2006, 13(1):35-41.
11. Kao W.J., et al. Theoretical analysis of in vivo macrophage adhesion and foreign body giant cell formation on polydimethylsiloxane, low density polyethylene, and polyetherurethanes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1994, 28(1):73-79.
12. Rice J.M., Fisher A.C., Hunt J.A. Macrophage-polymer interactions. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 1998, 9(8):833-847.
13. Mirzadeh H., Shokrolahi F., Daliri M. Effect of silicon rubber crosslink density on fibroblast cell behavior in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2003, 67(3):727-732.
14. Chang T.Y., et al. Cell and protein compatibility of parylene-C surfaces. Langmuir 2007, 23(23):11718-11725.
15. Kheir J.N., et al. Polydimethylsiloxane for augmentation of the chin, malar, and nasal bones. J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants 1998, 8(1):55-67.
16. Backovic A., Wolfram D. Silicone mammary implants-can we turn back the time?. Exp. Gerontol. 2007, 42(8):713-718.
17. Abbasi F., Mirzadeh H., Simjoo M. Hydrophilic interpenetrating polymer networks of poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) as biomaterial for cochlear implants. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2006, 17(3):341-355.
18. Mirzadeh H., Abbasi F. Segmented detachable structure of cochlear-implant electrodes for close-hugging engagement with the modiolus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2004, 68(2):191-198.
19. Klenkler B.J., et al. EGF-grafted PDMS surfaces in artificial cornea applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26(35):7286-7296.
20. Nicolson P.C., Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001, 22(24):3273-3283.
21. Barr S., Hill E., Bayat A. Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility. Eplasty 2009, 9:e22.
22. Brook M.A. Silicones, in Silicon, in Organic, Organometallic and Polymer Chemistry 2000, Wiley, New York, pp. 256-308.
23. Brook M.A., et al. Etching of Silicone Elastomers: Controlled Manipulation of Surface Roughness, in Synthesis and Properties of Silicones and Silicone-modified Materials 2010, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. S.J. Clarson (Ed.).
24. Abbadie A., et al. Low thermal budget surface preparation of Si and SiGe. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004, 225(1-4):256-266.
25. Parker J., et al. Soft-tissue response to silicone and poly-l-lactic acid implants with a periodic or random surface micropattern. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 61(1):91-98.
26. Patel K.R., et al. Evaluation of polymer and self-assembled monolayer-coated silicone surfaces to reduce neural cell growth. Biomaterials 2006, 27(8):1519-1526.
27. Ai H., et al. Gelatin-glutaraldehyde cross-linking on silicone rubber to increase endothelial cell adhesion and growth. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2002, 38(9):487-492.
28. Poeppl N., et al. Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture?. Aesthet. Plast. Surg. 2007, 31(2):133-139.
29. Barnsley G.P., Sigurdson L.J., Barnsley S.E. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006, 117(7):2182-2190.
30. Wong C.H., et al. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006, 118(5):1224-1236.
31. Wong J.Y., Leach J.B., Brown X.Q. Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell-biomaterial interface: issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response. Surf. Sci. 2004, 570(1-2):119-133.
32. denBraber E.T., et al. Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Biomaterials 1996, 17(21):2037-2044.
33. Schumacher J.F., et al. Engineered antifouling microtopographies-effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the green alga Ulva. Biofouling 2007, 23(1):55-62.
34. Fan Y.W., et al. Culture of neural cells on silicon wafers with nano-scale surface topograph. J. Neurosci. Methods 2002, 120(1):17-23.