The use of the R language for medicinal chemistry applications

Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 12, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 1957-1964

  Mente, Scot ^a   Kuhn, Max ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

QSAR; R; Statistics

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME P450; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR;

ABSORPTION; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; CHEMICAL DATABASE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; FINGER DERMATOGLYPHICS; LIPIDOSIS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE; PLASMA CLEARANCE; PLASMA PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PUBLICATION; R LANGUAGE; TOXICITY;

ABSORPTION; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DATABASES, CHEMICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84874826205     PISSN: 15680266     EISSN: 18734294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/156802612804910322     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Chambers, J. M., Programming with Data: a Guide to the S Languange. 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1998; p 469.
2. Archer, K. J.; Kimes, R. V., Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2008, 52 (4), 2249-2260.
3. Pang, H.; Lin, A.; Holford, M.; Enerson, B. E.; Lu, B.; Lawton, M. P.; Floyd, E.; Zhao, H., Pathway analysis using random forests classification and regression. Bioinformatics 2006, 22 (16), 2028-2036.
4. Grant, B. J.; Rodrigues, A. P. C; ElSawy, K. M.; McCammon, J. A.; Caves, L. S. D., Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 2006, 22 (21), 2695-2696.
5. Guha, R., Generating, Using and Visualizing Molecular Information in R. R News 2006, 6 (3), 28-33.
6. Steinbeck, C; Han, Y.; Kuhn, S.; Horlacher, O.; Luttmann, E.; Willighagen, E., The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An Open-Source Java Library for Chemo- and Bioinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (2), 493-500.
7. Backman, T. W. H.; Cao, Y.; Girke, T., ChemMine tools: an online service for analyzing and clustering small molecules. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 39 (suppl 2), W486-W491.
8. Cao, Y.; Charisi, A.; Cheng, L. C; Jiang, T.; Girke, T., Chemmine R: a compound mining framework for R. Bioinformatics 2008, 24 (18596077), 1733-1734.
9. Svetnik, V.; Liaw, A.; Tong, C; Culberson, J. C; Sheridan, R. P.; Feuston, B. P., Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (6), 1947-1958.
10. Palmer, D. S.; O'Boyle, N. M.; Glen, R. C; Mitchell, J. B. O., Random Forest Models To Predict Aqueous Solubility. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2006, 47 (1), 150-158.
11. Hughes, L. D.; Palmer, D. S.; Nigsch, F.; Mitchell, J. B. O., Why Are Some Properties More Difficult To Predict than Others? A Study of QSPR Models of Solubility, Melting Point, and Log P. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2008, 48 (1), 220-232.
12. Mente; Lombardo, A recursive-partitioning model for blood-brain barrier permeation. J. Comp-Aided Mol. Design 2005, 19 (7), 465-481 %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-005-9001-7.
13. Lombardo, F.; Obach, R. S.; DiCapua, F. M.; Bakken, G. A.; Lu, J.; Potter, D. M.; Gao, F.; Miller, M. D.; Zhang, Y., A Hybrid Mixture Discriminant Analysis-Random Forest Computational Model for the Prediction of Volume of Distribution of Drugs in Human. J. of Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (7), 2262-2267.
14. Sheridan, R. P.; Korzekwa, K. R.; Torres, R. A.; Walker, M. J., Empirical Regioselectivity Models for Human Cytochromes P450 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9. J. of Med. Chem. 2007, 50 (14), 3173-3184.
15. Lee, P.; Cucurull-Sanchez, L.; Lu, J.; Du, Y., Development of in silico models for human liver microsomal stability. J. Comp-Aided Mol. Design 2007, 21 (12), 665-673.
16. Berellini, G.; Waters, N. J.; Lombardo, F., In silico Prediction of Total Human Plasma Clearance. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2012.
17. Song, M.; Clark, M., Development and Evaluation of an in Silico Model for hERG Binding. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2005, 46 (1), 392-400.
18. Lowe, R.; Glen, R. C; Mitchell, J. B. O., Predicting Phospholi pidosis Using Machine Learning. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2010, 7 (5), 1708-1714.
19. Zhang, Q.-Y.; Aires-de-Sousa, J., Random Forest Prediction of Mutagenicity from Empirical Physicochemical Descriptors. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2006, 47 (1), 1-8.
20. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ding, J.; Wang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, S., In silico Prediction of Androgenic and Nonandrogenic Compounds Using Random Forest. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 2009, 28(4), 396-405.
21. Hao, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S., A classification study of human p3-adrenergic receptor agonists using BCUT descriptors. Molecular diversity 2011, 15 (4), 877-887.
22. Wager, T. T.; Liras, J. L.; Mente, S.; Trapa, P., Strategies to minimize CNS toxicity: in vitro high-throughput assays and computational modeling. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism Toxicology 2012, 8 (5), 531-542.
23. Mente, S.; Doran, A.; Wager, T. T., Getting the MAX out of Computational Models: The Prediction of Unbound-Brain and Unbound-Plasma Maximum Concentrations. ACS Medicinal Che mistry Letters 2012, 3 (6), 515-519.
24. Ballante, F.; Ragno, R., 3-D QSAutogrid/R: An Alternative Procedure To Build 3-D QSAR Models. Methodologies and Applications. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2012, 52 (6), 1674-1685.
25. Kazius, J.; McGuire, R.; Bursi, R., Derivation and Validation of Toxicophores for Mutagenicity Prediction. J. of Med. Chem. 2004, 48 (1), 312-320.
26. Goodford, P. J., A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macro molecules. J. of Med. Chem. 1985, 28 (7), 849-857.
27. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1988, 110 (18), 5959-5967.
28. Baroni, M.; Costantino, G.; Cruciani, G.; Riganelli, D.; Valigi, R.; Clementi, S., Generating Optimal Linear PLS Estimations (GOLPE): An Advanced Chemometric Tool for Handling 3D- QSAR Problems. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 1993, 12 (1), 9-20.
29. Morris, G. M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M. F.; Belew, R. K.; Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J., AutoDock4 and AutoDock Tools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2009, 30 (16), 2785-2791.
30. Johnson, S. R., The Trouble with QSAR (or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2007, 48 (1), 25-26.
31. Maggiora, G. M., On Outliers and Activity Cliffs Why QSAR Often Disappoints. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2006, 46 (4), 1535-1535.
32. Guha, R.; Van Drie, J. H., Structure-Activity Landscape Index: Identifying and Quantifying Activity Cliffs. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2008, 48 (3), 646-658.
33. Guha, R.; Van Drie, J. H., Assessing How Well a Modeling Protocol Captures a Structure-Activity Landscape. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2008, 48 (8), 1716-1728.
34. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A., Beware of q-squared. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modeling 2002, 20, 269-276.
35. Kuhn, M., Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 28 (5), 1-26.
36. Pipeline Pilot. http://accelyrs.com/products/pipeline-pilot/.
37. KNIME. 2012.
38. Kuhn, T.; Willighagen, E.; Zielesny, A.; Steinbeck, C, CDK- Taverna: an open workflow environment for cheminformatics. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, 159.
39. Warr W., Scientific workflow systems: Pipeline Pilot and KNIME. J. Comp-Aided Mol. Design 2012, 1-4.
40. Gesmann, M.; Castillo, D. d., google Vis: Interface between R and the Google Visualisation API. The R Journal 2011, 3 (2), 40-44.
41. Venancio, T. M.; Balaji, S.; Geetha, S.; Aravind, L., Robustness and evolvability in natural chemical resistance: identification of novel systems properties, biochemical mechanisms and regulatory interactions. Molecular BioSystems 2010, 6 (8), 1475-1491.
42. Huang, D.; Zhou, T.; Lafleur, K.; Nevado, C; Caflisch, A., Kinase selectivity potential for inhibitors targeting the ATP binding site: a network analysis. Bioinformatics 2010, 26 (2), 198-204.
43. Stumpfe, D.; Bajorath, J., Methods for SAR visualization. RSC Advances 2012, 2 (2), 369-378.
44. Dimova, D.; Wawer, M.; Wassermann, A. M.; Bajorath, J. r., Design of Multitarget Activity Landscapes That Capture Hierarchical Activity Cliff Distributions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2011, 51 (2), 258-266.