New polyethylenes in total hip replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 95 B, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 326-332

  Garcia Rey E ^a,b   Garcia Cimbrelo E ^a,b   Cruz Pardos, A ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ IDIPAZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; CHROMIUM; COBALT; HIGHLY CROSS LINKED POLYETHYLENE; NITROGEN; POLYETHYLENE; STAINLESS STEEL; ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE;

ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ACETABULUM; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR PROSTHESIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POLYETHYLENES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874749786     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Harris WH. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: The problem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;393:66-70.
2. McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Effect of sterilization method and other modifications on the wear resistance of acetabular cups made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: A hip-simulator study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1708-1725.
3. Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Jasty M, Harris WH. A novel method of cross-linking UHMWPE to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:149-160.
4. Rieker CB, Konrad R, Schön R, Schneider W, Abt NA. In vivo and in vitro surface changes in a highly cross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2003;18(Suppl):48-54.
5. Muratoglu OK, Greenbaum ES, Bragdon CR, et al. Surface analysis of early retrieved acetabular polyethylene: A comparison of conventional and liners highly crosslinked polyethylenes. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:68-77.
6. McKellop HA, Shen FW, Campbell P, Ota T. Effect of molecular weight, calcium stearate, and sterilization methods on the wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups in a hip joint simulator. J Orthop Res 1999;17:329-339.
7. Gomez-Barrena E, Puertolas JA, Munuera L, Könttinen YT. Update on UHMWPE research: From the bench to the bedside. Acta Orthop 2008;79:832-840.
8. Schroder DT, Kelly NH, Wright TM, Parks ML. Retrieved highly crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners have similar wear damage as conventional UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:387-394.
9. Illgen RL 2nd, Forsythe TM, Pike JW, Laurent MP, Blanchard CR. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles-an in vitro comparison of biologic activities. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:721-730.
10. García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Ortega-Chamarro J. New polyethylenes in total hip replacement: A prospective, comparative clinical study of two types of liner. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:149-153.
11. Triclot P, Grosjean G, El Masri, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M. A comparison of the penetration rate of two ployethylene acetabular liner of different levels of crosslinking: A prospective randomsed trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1439-1445.
12. McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, et al. Wear rate of highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A:773-782.
13. Beksaç B, Salas A, González Della Valle A, Salvati EA. Wear is reduced in THA performed with highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1765-1772.
14. Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Vencken W, Heyligers IC, Tonino AJ. Cross-linked compared with historical polyethylene in THA: An 8-year clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:979-984.
15. Thomas GER, Simpson DJ, Mehmood S, et al. The seven-year wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:716-722.
16. Dorr LD, Wan Z, Shahrdar C, et al. Clinical performance of a Durasul highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1816-1820.
17. Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW. The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: A three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:556-560.
18. Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, Coldham G, Krause B. Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis: Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:256-266.
19. D'Aubigné RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1954;36-A:451-475.
20. Manning DW, Chiang PP, Martell JM, Galante JO, Harris WH. In vivo comparative wear study of traditional and highly-cross linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:880-886.
21. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasty: A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:161-168.
22. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;121:20-32.
23. Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;444:176-183.
24. Dorr LD, Wan Z. Ten years of experience with porous acetabular components for revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;319:191-200.
25. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1635-1640.
26. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Jr, Shah N, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic evaluation of penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner over time. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1040-1046.
27. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Jr, Yang A, Engh CA. Analysis of temporal wear pattern of porous-coated acetabular components: Distinguishing between true wear and socalled bedding-in. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81-A:821-830.
28. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: Two-years of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:337-334.
29. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;171:17-27.
30. Goetz DD, Smith EJ, Harris WH. The prevalence of femoral osteolysis associated with components inserted with or without cement in total hip replacements: A retrospective matched-pair series. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:1121-1129.
31. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement: The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1987;69-B:45-55.
32. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for porous-coated hip implants: The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;261:63-80.
33. Dorr LD, Faugere MCC, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 1993;14:231-242.
34. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:163-166.
35. García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, Cordero-Ampuero J. Outcome of a hemispherical porous-coated acetabular component with a proximally hydroxyapatitecoated anatomic femoral component: A 12-to 15-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:327-332.
36. Zenz P, Stiehl JB, Knechtel H, Titzer-Hochmaier G, Schwagerl W. Ten-year follow-up of the non-porous Allofit cementless acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:1443-1447.
37. Thanner J, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Herberts P. Poor outcome of the PCA and Harris-Galante hip prostheses: Randomized study of 171 arthroplasties with 9-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:155-162.
38. Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, et al. Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:593-600.
39. Bankston AB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Ritter MA. Polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty in patient matched groups: A comparison of stainless steel, cobalt chrome, and titanium bearing surfaces. J Arthroplasty 1993;8:315-322.
40. Hallan G, Dybvik E, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Metal-backed acetabular components with conventional polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:196-200.
41. Wan Z, Boutary M, Dorr LD. Precision and limitation of measuring two-dimensional wear on clinical radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;449:267-274.
42. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Madero R, Ortega-Andreu M. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymüller Alloclassic system: A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:296-303.
43. Digas G, Kärrlhom J, Thanner J, Herberts P. 5-year experience of highly crosslinked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: Two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 2007;78:746-754.
44. Muratoglu OK, Wannomae J, Christensen S, Rubash HE, Harris WH. Ex vivo wear of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;438:158-164.
45. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:649-660.
46. García-Cimbrelo E, Tapia M, Martin-Hervas C. Multislice computed tomography for evaluating acetabular defects in revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;463:138-143.
47. Mail NA, Nunley Rm, Zhu JJ, et al. The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethyelene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:372-380.
48. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Cordero J, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Low-friction arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old: 20-to 25-year results. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:825-832.
49. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:125-134.