Low-friction arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old: 20- to 25-year results

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 825-832

  Garcia Cimbrelo, Eduardo ^a   Cruz Pardos, Ana ^a   Cordero, Jose ^a   Sanchez Sotelo, Joaquin ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cemented total hip arthroplasty; Young patients

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0033755564     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.8097     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Joint replacement surgery in patients under thirty
2. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old: A five-year follow-up study
3. Long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty in patients 30 years of age or younger
4. Long-term (twelve to eighteen-year) follow-up of cemented total hip replacements in patients who are less than fifty years old: A follow-up note
5. Survivorship of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger
6. Long term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger, a 16-year follow-up study
7. Total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley prosthesis in patients fifty-five years old and less, fifteen to twenty-one year results
8. Remodelling of bone around hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems
9. Cement disease
10. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in young patients. In The hip
11. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip
12. Early and late loosening of the acetabular cup after low-friction arthroplasty
13. Progression of radiolucent lines adjacent to the acetabular component and factors influencing migration after Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty
14. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis
15. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement
16. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component
17. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low-friction arthroplasties
18. Flanged acetabular components in cemented Charnley hip arthroplasty: Ten-year follow-up of 350 patients
19. Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique: Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up
20. Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old
21. Hybrid total hip replacement: A 6.5-year follow-up study
22. 'Modes of failure' of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening
23. The natural story of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on long-term survival of Charnley total hip replacement
24. Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem
25. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations
26. Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age, ten-to 18-year results
27. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: A 12 year radiographic review
28. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who are less than fifty years old: A sixteen to twenty-two-year follow-up study
29. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients less than twenty years old
30. Primary total hip arthroplasty using noncemented porous-coated femoral components in patients with osteonecrosis
31. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head
32. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head treated with total hip arthroplasty without cement
33. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip: A follow-up note
34. Low-friction arthroplasty in severe acetabular dysplasia
35. The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis
36. Radiological loosening after cemented hip replacement for juvenile chronic arthritis
37. Results of cemented total hip replacement in juvenile chronic arthritis: A radiological review
38. Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients
39. Long-term results of cemented Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in patients aged less than 30 years
40. Alumina on alumina hip replacement results and survivorship in young patients
41. Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system
42. The femoral component in low-friction arthroplasty after ten years
43. Acetabular and femoral fixation 15 years after cemented total hip surgery
44. Options for primary femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty: Cemented stem for all
45. Stem fixation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients using an intramedullary bone block
46. Osteolysis around and uncemented cobalt chrome total hip arthroplasty
47. Increasing prevalence of femoral lysis in cementless total hip arthroplasty
48. Failure mechanisms of anatomic porous replacement I cementless total hip replacement
49. Porous-coated total hip replacement
50. Extensively coated femoral components in young patients
51. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: Excellent results at ten-year follow-up
52. Hydroxyapatite coated-implants: Total hip arthroplasty in the young patient and patients with avascular necrosis
53. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger
54. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7- to 10-year results
55. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: A 7- to 10-year follow-up
56. Hybrid total hip replacement: Rationale and intermediate clinical results
57. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult