Validation of the TonoVet® rebound tonometer in normal and glaucomatous cats

Veterinary Ophthalmology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 111-118

  Mclellan, Gillian ^a,b   Kemmerling, Jeremy P ^a   Kiland, Julie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cat; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Manometry; Tono Pen XL; TonoVet

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CAT; CAT DISEASE; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION STUDY; GLAUCOMA; METHODOLOGY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; CAT DISEASES; CATS; GLAUCOMA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84874749715     PISSN: 14635216     EISSN: 14635224     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2012.01038.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. McLellan GJ, Miller PE. Feline glaucoma-a comprehensive review. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2011; 14: 15-29.
2. Kroll MM, Miller PE, Rodan I. Intraocular pressure measurements obtained as part of a comprehensive geriatric health examination from cats 7years of age or older. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2001; 219: 1406-1410.
3. Ridgway MD, Brightman AH. Feline glaucoma: a retrospective study of 29 animal cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 1989; 25: 485-490.
4. Blocker T, van der Woerdt A. The feline glaucomas: 82 cases (1995-1999). Veterinary Ophthalmology 2001; 4: 81-85.
5. Walde I, Rapp E. Feline glaucoma. Clinical and morphological aspects (a retrospective study of 38 cases). European Journal of Companion Animal Practice 1993; 4: 87-105.
6. Dietrich U. Feline glaucomas. Clincal Techniques Small Animal Practice 2005; 20: 108-116.
7. Wilensky JTEpidemiology of open-angle glaucoma. In: Textbook of Ophthalmology: Vol. 7 (Glaucoma). (eds Kaufman PL, Mittag TV) Mosby, London, UK, 1994; 29-33.
8. Kaufman PL, Davis GE. Minified Goldmann applanating prism for tonometry in monkeys and humans. Archives of Ophthalmology 1980; 98: 542-546.
9. Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1990; 51: 935-937.
10. Miller PE, Picket JP, Majors LJ et al. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1991; 52: 1917-1921.
11. ® calibration curves for cats, cows, and sheep. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2004; 7: 261-264.
12. Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar PD et al. Ex vivo evaluation of Tono-Pen and pneumotonometry in cat eyes. Ophthalmic Research 2006; 38: 13-18.
13. ®) in clinically normal cat eyes. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2010; 13: 31-36.
14. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2000; 78: 142-145.
15. ® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists. Eye 2008; 22: 503-506.
16. Filippopoulos T, Matsubara A, Danias J et al. Predictability and limitations of non-invasive murine tonometry: comparison of two devices. Experimental Eye Research 2006; 83: 194-201.
17. Görig C, Coenen RTI, Stades FC et al. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2006; 67: 134-144.
18. Knollinger AM, Croix NCI, Barrett PM et al. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2005; 227: 244-248.
19. Leiva M, Naranjo C, Pena MT. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare®) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL®) in normotensive dogs. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2006; 9: 17-21.
20. Kalesnykas G, Uusitalo H. Comparison of simultaneous readings of intraocular pressure in rabbits using Perkins handheld, Tono-Pen XL, and TonoVet tonometers. Graefe's Archive for Clincal Experimental Ophthalmology 2007; 245: 761-762.
21. Kim CY, Kuehn MH, Anderson MG et al. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry. Eye 2007; 21: 1202-1209.
22. Jeong M, Kim Y, Yi N et al. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo). Veterinary Ophthalmology 2007; 10: 376-379.
23. Reuter A, Müller K, Arndt G et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of the TonoVet rebound tonometer in birds of prey. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2010; 13(Suppl. 1): 80-85.
24. Yu W, Cao G, Qiu J et al. Evaluation of monkey intraocular pressure by rebound tonometer. Molecular Vision 2009; 15: 2196-2201.
25. Elsmo EJ, Kiland JA, Kaufman PL et al. Evaluation of rebound tonometry in non-human primates. Experimental Eye Research 2011; 92: 268-273.
26. Peterson JA, Kiland JA, Croft MA et al. Intraocular pressure measurement in cynomolgus monkeys. Tono-Pen vs. manometry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1996; 37: 1197-1199.
27. Bárány EH. Simultaneous measurement of changing intraocular pressure and outflow facility in the vervet monkey by constant pressure infusion. Investigative Ophthalmology 1964; 2: 135-143.
28. Bergea B, Bodin L, Svedbergh B. Impact of intraocular pressure regulation on visual fields in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 997-1004.
29. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma 2000; 9: 134-142.
30. Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA et al. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2006; 84: 206-209.
31. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Survey of Ophthalmology 1993; 38: 1-30.
32. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D et al. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 80-84.