Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Volumn 227, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 244-248

  Knollinger, Amy M ^a   La Croix, Noelle C ^a,c   Barrett, Paul M ^a   Miller, Paul E ^b  

^a Eye Care For Animals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c Animal Diagnostic Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL MODEL; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; ENUCLEATION; EVALUATION; HORSE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; NONHUMAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TONOMETER;

ANIMALS; DOGS; HORSES; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS; EQUIDAE; EQUUS CABALLUS;

EID: 22244455806     PISSN: 00031488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.244     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Miller PE. Glaucoma. In: Slatter D, ed. Textbook of small animal surgery, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2003;1454-1477.
2. Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in horses. Am J Vet Res 1990;51:935-937.
3. Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ, et al. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats. Am J Vet Res 1991;52:1917-1921.
4. Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ, et al. Clinical comparison of the Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen applanation tonometers in the dog. Prog Vet Comp Ophthalmol 1991;1:171-176.
5. Priehs DR, Gum GG, Whitley RD, et al. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1990;51:1547-1550.
6. Dziezyc J, Millichamp NJ, Smith WB. Comparison of applanation tonometers in dogs and horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;201:430-433.
7. Gelatt KN, MacKay EO. Distribution of intraocular pressure in dogs. Vet Ophthalmol 1998;1:109-114.
8. Miller PE, Pickett JP. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;201:1021-1025.
9. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, et al. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:781-785.
10. Goldblum D, Kontiola AI, Mittag T, et al. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:942-946.
11. Danias J, Lee KC, Zamora MF, et al. Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in aging DBA/2NNia glaucomatous mice: comparison with RGC loss in aging C57/BL6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5151-5162.
12. Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, et al. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1138-1141.
13. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:3-7.
14. Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, et al. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1697-1700.
15. DeLint PJ, Berendschot TT, van de Kraats J, et al. Slow optical changes in human photoreceptors induced by light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:282-289.
16. Panek WC, Boothe WA, Lee DA, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement with the Tono-Pen through soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:62-65.
17. Miller PE, Murphy CJ. Intraocular pressure measurement through two types of plano therapeutic soft contact lenses in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1995;56:1418-1420.