Larger or Broader: Performance Implications of Size and Diversity of the Knowledge Worker's Egocentric Network

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 139-165

  Chen, Liang ^a   Gable, Guy G ^b  

^a EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Knowledge worker; Network dispersion evenness; Network dispersion richness; Network diversity; Network size; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874550174     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2012.00295.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alatalo, R. V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos, 37(2): 199-204.
2. Allen, T. 1970. Communication networks in R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 1(1): 14-21.
3. Allen, T. 1977. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341.
5. Anderson, M. H. 2008. Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers' information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1): 51-78.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
7. Becker, G. S. 1964. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4): 432-445.
9. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4): 518-539.
10. Brass, D. J. 1992. Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore & J. A. White (Eds.), Research in politics and society, 4: 295-323. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Campbell, K. E., Marsden, P. V., & Hurlbert, J. S. 1986. Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8(1): 97-117.
13. Carroll, G., & Teo, A. 1996. On the social networks of managers. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 421-440.
14. Chai, S.-K., & Rhee, M. 2010. Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 5-29.
15. Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
16. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.
17. Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., & Salter, A. 2009. Outside in, inside out: The impact of knowledge heterogeneity, intra- and extra-organizational ties on innovative status. The Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6.
18. Cronbach, L. J. 1987. Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3): 414-417.
19. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. 2004. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 928-937.
20. Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. 2001. Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2): 100-120.
21. Cross, R., Nohria, N., & Parker, A. 2002. Six myths about informal networks and how to overcome them. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3): 67-75.
22. Cross, R., & Sproull, L. 2004. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4): 446-462.
23. Cross, R., & Thomas, R. J. 2008. How top talent uses networks and where rising stars get trapped. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2): 165-180.
24. Cummings, J. N. 2004. Work groups, structural diversity and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3): 352-364.
25. Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R. 2003. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3): 197-210.
26. Davis, S. M., & Lawrence, P. R. 1977. Matrix. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. De Graaf, N., & Flap, H. 1988. With a little help from my friends: Social resources as an explanation of occupational status and income in West Germany, the Netherlands and the United States. Social Forces, 67(2): 452-472.
28. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4): 737-770.
29. Gabbay, S. M., & Leenders, R. T. A. J. 2001. Social capital in organizations: From social structure to the management of corporate social capital. In S. M. Gabbay & R. T. A. J. Leenders (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: 1-20. Oxford: JAI Press.
30. Galbraith, J. R. 1977. Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2): 183-196.
32. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
33. Hansen, M. T. 2000. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3): 232-248.
34. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716-749.
35. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1199-1228.
36. Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2): 427-432.
37. Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1): 88-115.
38. Kaše, R., Paauwe, J., & Zupan, N. 2009. HR practice, interpersonal relations, and intrafirm knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A social network perspective. Human Resource Management, 48(4): 615-639.
39. Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. T. A. J., & Van Engelen, J. M. L. 2008. The social structure of leadership and creativity in engineering design teams: An empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25(4): 269-286.
40. Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. 2008. Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: Evidence from the retail industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 401-423.
41. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Li, S. X., Yao, X., Sue-Chan, C., & Xi, Y. 2011. Where do social ties come from: Institutional framework and governmental ties distribution among Chinese managers. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 97-124.
43. Li, Y., Guo, H., Yi, Y., & Liu, Y. 2010. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese firms: The mediating role of learning orientation. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 77-100.
44. Lin, N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. In J. Hagan & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, Vol. 25: 467-487. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
45. Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4): 393-405.
46. Lloyd, M., & Ghelardi, R. J. 1964. A table for calculating the 'equitability' component of species diversity. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 33(2): 217-225.
47. Luo, J.-D. 2011. Guanxi revisited: An exploratory study of familiar ties in a Chinese workplace. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 329-351.
48. Marsden, P. 1990. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1): 435-463.
49. Marsden, P., & Hurlbert, J. 1988. Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. Social Forces, 66(4): 1038-1059.
50. McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 735-745.
51. Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. 2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1): 121-146.
52. Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. 2006. The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1): 64-79.
53. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-266.
54. Oh, H., Chung, M. H., & Labianca, G. 2004. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 860-875.
55. Peet, R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 285-307.
56. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 89-106.
57. Pfeffer, J. 2010. Power. Why some people have it - and others don't. Harper Collins Publishers.
58. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 240-267.
59. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Orgaization Science, 12(4): 502-517.
60. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 219-237.
61. Simon, L., & Davies, G. 1996. A contextual approach to management learning: The Hungarian case. Organization Studies, 17(2): 269-289.
62. Smith, B., & Wilson, J. B. 1996. A consumer's guide to evenness indices. Oikos, 76(1): 70-82.
63. Smith, K. G., Collins, C., & Clark, K. D. 2005. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 346-357.
64. Stevenson, W., & Gilly, M. 1991. Information processing and problem solving: The migration of problems through formal positions and network ties. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4): 918-928.
65. Stirling, G., & Wilsey, B. 2001. Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. The American Naturalist, 158(3): 286-299.
66. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter special issue): 27-43.
67. Teachman, J. D. 1980. Analysis of population diversity. Sociology Methods & Research, 8(3): 341-362.
68. Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business-unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996-1004.
69. Walsh, I. J., Bhatt, M., & Bartunek, J. M. 2009. Organizational knowledge creation in the Chinese context. Management and Organization Review, 5(2): 261-278.
70. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
71. Wong, S. 2008. Judgements about knowledge importance: The roles of social referents and network structure. Human Relations, 61(11): 1565-1591.
72. Wu, J., & Shanley, M. T. 2009. Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry. Journal of Business Research, 62(4): 474-483.
73. Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 1-31.