Reading "Sun" and Looking Up: The Influence of Language on Saccadic Eye Movements in the Vertical Dimension

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Dudschig, Carolin ^a   Souman, Jan ^a   Lachmair, Martin ^a   de la Vega, Irmgard ^a   Kaup, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; SACCADES; SOLAR SYSTEM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874515602     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056872     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Itti L, Koch C, (2000) A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Res 40: 1489-1506.
2. Hommel B, Pratt J, Colzato L, Godijn R, (2001) Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychol Sci 12: 360-365.
3. Logan GD, (1995) Linguistic and conceptual control of visual-spatial attention. Cogn Psychol 28: 103-174.
4. Barsalou LW, (1999) Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behav Brain Sci 22: 637-660.
5. Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP, (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev 9: 558-565.
6. Zwaan RA, Madden CJ (2005) Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 224-245.
7. Dudschig C, Lachmair M, de la Vega I, De Filippis M, Kaup B, (2012) From top to bottom: Spatial shifts of attention caused by linguistic stimuli. Cogn Process 13: 151-154.
8. Tanenhaus MK, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Eberhard KM, Sedivy JC, (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632-1634.
9. Altmann GTM, Kamide Y, (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73: 247-264.
10. Eberhard KM, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK, (1995) Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. J Psycholinguist Res 24: 409-436.
11. Posner MI, (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32: 3-25.
12. Hodgson T, Chamberlain M, Parris B, James M, Gutowski N, et al. (2007) The role of ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control. Brain 130: 1525-1537.
13. Stroop JR, (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18: 643-662.
14. Estes Z, Verges M, Barsalou LW, (2008) Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the object's typical location. Psychol Sci 19: 93-97.
15. Kosslyn S, Ganis G, Thompson W, (2001) Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 635-642.
16. Bergen BK, Lindsay S, Matlock T, Narayanan S, (2007) Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science 31: 733-764.
17. Verges M, Duffy S, (2009) Spatial representations elicit dual-coding effects in mental imagery. Cogn Sci 33: 1157-1172.
18. Thornton T, Loetscher T, Yates MJ, Nicholls MER, (2012) The highs and lows of the interaction between word meaning and space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0030467.
19. Lachmair M, Dudschig C, De Filippis M, de la Vega I, Kaup B, (2011) Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing. Psychon Bull Rev 18: 1180-1188.
20. Dudschig C, Lachmair M, de la Vega I, De Filippis M, Kaup B, (2012) Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm. Mem Cognit 7: 1081-1094.
21. Lu C-H, Proctor RW, (2001) Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: Effects of S-R association strength and relative timing. Q J Exp Psychol 51A: 95-136.
22. Hanna JE, Brennan SE, (2007) Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. J Mem Lang 57: 596-615.
23. Richardson DC, Dale R, Kirkham NZ, (2007) The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychol Sci 18: 407-413.
24. Hoffman JE, Subramaniam B, (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57: 787-795.
25. Deubel H, Schneider WX, (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res 36: 1827-1837.
26. Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, et al. (1998) A Common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21: 761-773.
27. Schwarz W, Keus IM, (2004) Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Percept Psychophys 66: 651-664.
28. Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P, (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 122: 371-396.
29. Lakoff G, Johnson M, (1980) The metaphorical structure of human conceptual system. Cogn Sci 4: 195-208.
30. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
31. Pelli DG, (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442.
32. Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D, (2007) What's new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36ECVP Abstract Supplement.
33. Cornelissen FW, Peters E, Palmer J, (2002) The eyelink toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the psychophysics toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 34: 613-617.
34. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna. Available: http://www.R-project.org.
35. Goldring J, Fischer B, (1997) Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks. Exp Brain Res 113: 88-103.
36. Loftus GR, Masson MEJ, (1994) Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon Bull Rev 1: 476-490.
37. Zwaan RA, Stanfield RA, Yaxley RH, (2002) Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol Sci 13: 168-171.
38. Todd Maddox W, (2001) Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization. Percept Psychophys 63: 1183-1200.
39. Gozli DG, Chasteen AL, Pratt J, (2012) The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention. J Exp Psychol Gen Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0030362.
40. Peterson MS, Kramer AF, Irwin DE, (2004) Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements. Percept Psychophys 66: 398-405.
41. Chun MM, Golomb JD, Turk-Browne NB, (2011) A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annu Rev Psychol 62: 73-101.
42. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W, (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24: 849-937.
43. Huettig F, Rommers J, Meyer AS, (2011) Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychol 137: 151-171.
44. Tanenhaus MK, Brown-Schmidt S, (2008) Language processing in the natural world. Phil Trans R Soc B 363: 1105-1122.