Linking modal choice to motility: A comprehensive review

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 49, Issue , 2013, Pages 329-341

  De Witte, Astrid ^a   Hollevoet, Joachim ^a   Dobruszkes, Frédéric ^b   Hubert, Michel ^c   Macharis, Cathy ^a,d  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c FACULTÉS UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LOUIS   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Determinants; Modal choice; Motility; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; TRANSPORTATION;

CHOICE PROCESS; DAILY LIVES; DETERMINANTS; MODAL CHOICE; MOTILITY; POLICY MEASURES; TRANSPORT POLICY; TRAVEL BEHAVIORS;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

KNOWLEDGE; MOTILITY; POLICY MAKING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84874434974     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Annema J.A. Weerstanden van verplaatsingen: tijd, kosten en moeite. Verkeer en vervoer in hoofdlijnen 2002, 97-117. Couthino, Bussum. B. Van Wee, M. Dijst (Eds.).
2. Axhausen, K., 2002. A dynamic understanding of travel demand: a sketch. Arbeitsbericht Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, 119. Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transportsysteme (IVT), ETH Zürich.
3. Bamberg S., Rölle D., Weber C. Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode?. Transportation 2003, 30:97-108.
4. Banister D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy 2008, 15(2):73-80.
5. Bastin, G., Dobruszkes, F., 2006. Plans de déplacements d'entreprises: analyses et prospectives, Rapport Final. Unpublished Study Commissioned by Bruxelles Environement/IBGE.
6. Bhat C. Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1997, 31(1):41-54.
7. Bhat C. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1998, 32(6):361-371.
8. Bhat C., Singh S. A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for workers. Transportation Research Part A 2000, 34:1-22.
9. Bresson G., Dargay J., Madre J., Pirotte A. Economic and structural determinants of the demand for public transport: an analysis on a panel of French urban areas using shrinkage estimators. Transportation Research Part A 2004, 37:605-627.
10. Brown B., Werner C., Kim N. Personal and contextual factors supporting the switch to transit use: evaluating a natural transit intervention. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2003, 3(1):139-160.
11. Camagni R., Gibelli M.C., Rigamonti P. Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological Economics 2002, 40(2):199-216.
12. Cascetta E., Papola A. A joint mode-transit service choice model incorporating the effect of regional transport service timetables. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2003, 37(7):595-614.
13. Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2002, 7(4):265-284.
14. Cirillo, C., Axhausen, K., 2002. Comparing urban activity travel behaviour. Transportation Research Board, 81th Annual Meeting, January 13-17, Washington, DC, 27p.
15. Cirillo C., Axhausen K. Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary. Transportation Research Part A: policy and practice 2006, 40(5):444-457.
16. European Commission Pricing and financing of urban transport 1996, Halcrow Fox, Brussels, 205p.
17. Currie G., Delbosc A. Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne. Transport Policy 2011, 18(1):204-210.
18. Dargay J. The effect of prices and income on car travel in the UK. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41(10):949-996.
19. De Palma A., Rochat D. Mode choices for trips to work in Geneva: an empirical analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 2000, 8:43-51.
20. De Witte A., Macharis C., Polain P., Lannoy S., Vandewalle, Steenberghen T. The impact of " Free" public transport: the case of brussels. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2006, 40(8):671-689.
21. De Witte A., Macharis C., Mairesse O. How persuasive is free public transport? A survey among commuters in the Brussels-Capital Region. Transport Policy 2008, 15:216-224.
22. Dijst M., Rietveld P., Steg L. Behoeften, mogelijkheden en gedragskeuzen met betrekking tot het verplaatsingsgedrag: een multidisciplinair perspectief. Verkeer en vervoer in hoofdlijnen 2002, 27-50. Couthino, Bussum. B. Van Wee, M. Dijst (Eds.).
23. Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M., Laporte, F., Veiders, C., 2011. Réorganisation d'un réseau de transport collectif urbain, ruptures de charge et mobilités éprouvantes: l'expérience bruxelloise (Reorganization of an urban public transport network, transfers and difficult journeys in Brussels). Articulo - Journal of Urban Research, vol. 7, pp. 1-16 http://articulo.revues.org/1844.
24. Frenay, P., 1994. Transport de personnes: éléments de choix modal - Réflexion pour la recherche d'un usage plus sélectif de l'automobile.Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles - Institut d'Urbanisme et d'Aménagement du Territoire.
25. Fujii S., Gärling T., Kitamura R. Changes in drivers' perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environment and Behaviour 2001, 33:796-808.
26. Fyrhi A., Hjorthol R. Children's independent mobility to school, friends and leisure activities. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:377-384.
27. Goodwin, P., Dargay, J., Hanly, M., 2004a. Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: a review. ESRC Transport Studies Unit, University College London. Commissioned by the UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
28. Goodwin, P., Cairns, S., Dargay, J., Hanly, M., Parkhurst, G., Stokes, G., Vythoulkas, P., 2004b. Changing travel behaviour. Script of presentation given at the Bloomsbury Theatre, London, ESRC Transport Studies Unit, University College London, 48p.
29. Grotenhuis J., Wiegmans B., Rietveld P. The desired quality of integrated multimodal travel information in public transport: customer needs for time and effort savings. Transport Policy 2007, 14:27-38.
30. Heath Y., Gifford R. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002, 32(10):2154-2189.
31. Hensher D. Empirical approaches to combining revealed and stated preference data: some recent developments with reference to urban mode choice. Research in Transportation Economics 2008, 23:23-29.
32. Hensher D., Rose J. Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: a case study. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41:428-443.
33. Hine J., Scott J. Seamless, accessible travel: users' views of the public transport journey and interchange. Transport Policy 2000, 7:217-226.
34. Innocenti, A., Lattarulo, P., Pazienza, M.G., 2009. An experimental analysis of travel mode choice, Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica - XI Riunione Scientifica--Trieste, Giugno, pp. 15-18.
35. Kajita, Y., Toi, S., Chishaki, T., Matsuoka, A., 2004. Structural mechanism of modal choice based on the linked structure of trip purpose and transportation choice. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, vol. 64(1), pp. 17-33.
36. Kaufmann, V., 2000. Mobilité quotidienne et dynamiques urbaines - La question du report modal, Lausanne, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, 252p.
37. Kaufmann, V., 2002. Re-thinking Mobility. Contemporary Sociology, Aldershot, Ashgate, 109p.
38. Kaufmann V., Bergman M., Joye D. Motility: mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2004, 28(4):745-756.
39. Kenworthy J., Laube F. Automobile dependence in cities: an international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1996, 16:279-308.
40. Kenyon S., Lyons G. The value of integrated multimodal traveller information and its potential contribution to modal change. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2003, 6(1):1-21.
41. Kim S., Ulfarsson G. Curbing automobile use for sustainable transportation: analysis of mode choice on short home-based trips. Transportation 2008, 35(6):723-737.
42. Krygsman S., Arentze T., Timmermans H. Capturing tour mode and activity choice interdependencies: a co-evolutionary logit modelling approach. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41:913-933.
43. Lang D., Collins D., Kearns R. Understanding modal choice for the trip to school. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(4):509-514.
44. Last, J., Manz, W., 2003. Unselected mode alternatives: what drives modal choice in long-distance passenger transport? Paper Presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, August, 2003.
45. Limtanakool N., Dijst M., Schwanen T. The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14:327-341.
46. Litman T. Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities. Journal of Public Transportation 2004, 7(2):37-58.
47. Litman T. Valuing transit service quality improvements. Journal of Public Transportation 2008, 11(2):43-63.
48. Lovelock C. Modeling the modal choice decision process. Transportation 1975, 4:253-265.
49. Lyons G., Chatterjee K., Beecroft M., Marsden G. Determinants of travel demand: exploring the future society and lifestyles in the UK. Transport Policy 2002, 9:17-27.
50. Mackett R. Why do people use their cars for short trips?. Transportation 2003, 30:329-349.
51. Meister K., Frick M., Axhausen K. A GA-based household scheduler. Transportation 2005, 32:473-494.
52. Nurul Habib K.M., Day N., Miller E. An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:639-653.
53. O'Fallon C., Sullivan C., Hensher D. Constraints affecting mode choices by morning car commuters. Transport Policy 2004, 11(1):17-29.
54. Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J., Titheridge, H., White, P., 2004. The Demand for Public Transport, Report for the Future Integrated Transport research Programme, 19p.
55. Pickery J. Pendelgedrag en attitudes tegenover aspecten van het mobiliteitsbeleid in Vlaanderen. Vlaanderen Gepeild 2005, 131-161. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Brussels. J. Lemaître, J. Pickery (Eds.).
56. Pucher J., Renne J. Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 national household travel survey. Transportation Quarterly 2003, 57(3):49-77.
57. Pucher J., Renne J. Rural mobility and mode choice: evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation 2005, 32(2):165-186.
58. Rietveld P. Non-motorised modes in transport systems: a multimodal chain perspective for The Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D 2000, 5:31-36.
59. Schafer, A., 2000. Regularities in travel demand: an international perspective, Journal of Transportation and Statistics, pp. 1-31.
60. Scheiner J., Holz-Rau C. Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?. Transportation 2007, 34(4):487-511.
61. Schwanen T., Dijst M., Dieleman F. Leisure trips of senior citizens: determinants of modal choice. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 2001, 92:347-360.
62. Schwanen T., Banister D., Anable J. Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Planning 2011, 45(10):993-1006.
63. Shen J., Sakata Y., Hashimoto Y. The influence of environmental deterioration and network improvement on transport modal choice. Environmental Science and Policy 2009, 12(3):338-346.
64. Van Acker, V., Van Wee, B. and Witlox, F. (2010) When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour, Transport Reviews, pp. 1-22.
65. Van de Walle S., Steenberghen T. Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:151-162.
66. Vasconcellos E.A. Urban change, mobility and transport in São Paulo: three decades, three cities. Transport Policy 2005, 12:91-104.
67. Vega A., Reynolds-Feighan A. A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:401-419.
68. Verplanken B., Aarts H., Van Knippenberg A. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology 1997, 27:539-560.
69. Wardman, M., Hine, J., 2000. Costs of Interchange: A Review of the Literature. University of Leeds, Institute of Transport Studies, Leeds.
70. Ye X., Pendyala R., Gottardi G. An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2007, 41(1):96-113.