A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 401-419

  Vega, Amaya ^a,b   Reynolds Feighan, Aisling ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Discrete choice analysis; Employment suburbanisation; Geographic information systems; Residential location; Travel mode choice

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HOUSING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; LOCATION;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; GREATER DUBLIN AREAS; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; METROPOLITAN REGIONS; RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS; SIMULATION EXERCISE; TRAVEL MODE CHOICES;

EMPLOYMENT;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EMPLOYMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; GIS; METROPOLITAN AREA; NETWORK ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SUBURBANIZATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; VISUALIZATION;

COUNTY DUBLIN; DUBLIN [COUNTY DUBLIN]; EURASIA; EUROPE; IRELAND; LEINSTER; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 61549132010     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abraham J.E., and Hunt J.D. Specification and estimation of nested logit model of home, workplaces, and commuter mode choices by multiple worker households. Transportation Research Record 1606 (1997) 17-24
2. Ben-Akiva M., and Bierlaire M. Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions. In: Hall R.W. (Ed). Handbook in Transportation Science (1999), Kluwer's International Series
3. Ben-Akiva M., and Bowman J.L. Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model. Urban Studies 35 (1998) 1131-1153
4. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1985), MIT Press, Massachusetts, Cambridge
5. Bhat C.R., and Guo J. A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38 (2004) 147-168
6. Bierlaire M. Discrete choice models. Operations Research in Traffic and Transportation Management 166 (1998) 203-227
7. Bierlaire, M., 2003. Biogeme: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Third Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
8. Bierlaire M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Annals of Operations Research 144 (2006) 287-300
9. Boarnet M., and Crane R. The influence of land use on travel behaviour: specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research Part A 35 (2001) 823-845
10. Boehm T. A hierarchical model of housing choice. Urban Studies (1982) 17-31
11. Brown B. Modal choice, location demand, and income. Journal of Urban Economics 20 (1986) 128-139
12. Carlsson-Kanyama A., and Lindén A.-L. Travel patterns and environmental effects now and in the future: implications of differences in energy consumption among socio-economic groups. Ecological Economics 30 (1999) 405-417
13. Cascetta E. Transportation systems engineering: theory and methods (2001), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston
14. Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice. Toward a normative framework. Transportation Research Part D 7 (2002) 265-284
15. Conniffe D., and Duffy D. Irish house price indices - methodological issues. The Economic and Social Review 30 (1999) 403-423
16. Central Statistics Office (CSO), 2002. Irish Census of Population - Place of Work Sample of Anonymised Records (POWSAR).
17. Daly A. Recursive Nested EV Model. Working Paper ITS 559 (2001), Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK
18. Daly A., and Bierlaire M. A general and operational representation of generalised extreme value models. Transportation Research Part B 40 (2006) 285-305
19. Deitz R. A joint model of residential and employment location in urban areas. Journal of Urban Economics 44 (1998) 197-215
20. Desalvo J.S., and Huq M. Mode choice, commuting cost, and urban household behavior. Journal of Regional Science 45 (2005) 493-517
21. Eliasson J., and Mattsson L.G. Transport and Location Effects of Road Pricing: A Simulation Approach 35 (2001) 417-456
22. Fleming M.C., and Nellis J.G. Research policy and review 2. House price statistics for the United Kingdom: a survey and critical review of recent developments. Environment and Planning A 17 (1985) 297-318
23. Fotheringham S.A. Consumer store choice and choice set definition. Marketing Science 7 (1988) 299-310
24. Fotheringham S.A., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M. Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis (2000), Sage Publications, London
25. Fotheringham S.A., and Curtis A. Regularities in spatial information processing: implications for modelling destination choice. Professional Geographer 2 (1999) 227-239
26. Freedman O., and Kern C.R. A model of workplace and residence choice in two-worker households. Regional Science and Urban Economics 27 (1997) 241-260
27. Giuliano G., and Gillespie A. Research issues regarding societal change and transport. Journal of Transport Geography 5 3 (1997) 165-176
28. Glaeser, E.L, Kahn, E., Rappaport, J., 2000. Why do poor live in cities? Harvard Institute of Economic Research. Discussion Paper Number 1891, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
29. Lerman, S.R., 1976. Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: a joint choice model. Transportation Research Record 610, 6-11.
30. Leroy S.F., and Sonstelie J. Paradise lost and regained: transportation innovation, income and residential location. Journal of Urban Economics 13 (1983) 67-89
31. Levine J. Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (1998) 133-149
32. Mcfadden, D., 1978. Modelling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist, A.L.L., Snickars, F., Weibull, J. (Eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. North-Holland, New York.
33. Nechyba T.J., and Walsh R.P. Urban Sprawl the Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 4 (2004) 177-200
34. Papola A. Some developments on the cross-nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38 (2004) 833-851
35. Permanent TSB/ESRI, 2003. National House Price Index. Permanent TSB, Ireland.
36. Quigley J.M. Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services. Regional Science and Urban Economics 15 (1985) 41-63
37. Rapaport C. Housing demand and community choice. An empirical approach. Journal of Urban Economics 42 (1997) 243-260
38. Romaní J., Suriñach J., and Artiís M. Are commuting and residential mobility decisions simultaneous? The case of Catalonia, Spain. Regional Studies 37 (2003) 813-826
39. Sermons W.M., and Koppelman F.S. Representing the differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location choice models. Journal of Transport Geography 9 (2001) 101-110
40. Sermons W.M., and Seredich N. Assessing traveler responsiveness to land and location based accessibility and mobility solutions. Transportation Research Part D 6 (2001) 417-428
41. Simpson W. Workplace location, residential location, and urban commuting. Urban Studies 24 (1987) 119-128
42. Small, K.A., Winston, C., Yan, J., 2002. Uncovering the distribution of motorists' preferences for travel time and reliability: implications for road pricing. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Irvine.
43. Srour I.M., Kockelman K.M., and Dunn T.P. Accessibility indices: a connection to residential land prices and location choices. Transportation Research Record 1805 (2002) 25-34
44. Tu Y., and Goldfinch J. A two-stage housing choice forecasting model. Urban Studies 33 (1996) 517-537
45. Vega A., and Reynolds-Feighan A. Employment sub-centres and the choice of mode of travel-to-work in the Dublin region. Urban Studies. 45 (2008) 9
46. Vovsha, P., 1997. The cross-nested logit model: application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area. Transportation Research Board.
47. Waddell P. Exogenous workplace choice in residential location models: Is the assumption valid?. Geographical Analysis 25 (1993) 65-82
48. Waddell, P., 1996. Accessibility and residential location: the interaction of workplace, residential mobility, tenure, and location choices. In: Lincoln Land Institute TRED Conference, Cambridge, MA.
49. Wen C.-H., and Koppelman F.S. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 627-641
50. White M.J. Location choice and commuting behaviour in cities with decentralised employment. Journal of Urban Economics 24 (1988) 129-152