An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 96-113

  Ye, Xin ^a   Pendyala, Ram M ^a   Gottardi, Giovanni ^b  

^a University of South Florida   (United States)

^b Jenni+Gottardi AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Causal relationships; Econometric modeling; Mode choice; Simultaneous equations; Tours; Travel behavior; Trip chains

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; HIGHWAY PLANNING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

MODE CHOICE; SIMULTANEOUS LOGIT MODEL; TOUR-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING SYSTEMS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRIP CHAINING PATTERNS;

HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 33746916130     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2006.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aptech, 1996. GAUSS 3.2. Aptech Systems, Maple Valley, Washington.
2. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1985), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
3. Bhat C.R. Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transportation Research B 31 1 (1997) 41-54
4. Dissanayake, D., Morikawa, T., 2002. Household travel behavior in developing countries: nested logit model of vehicle ownership, mode choice, and trip chaining. Transportation Research Record 1805. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 45-52.
5. Golob T.F. A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation. Transportation Research B 34 5 (2000) 355-376
6. Golob T.F. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transportation Research B 3 1 (2003) 1-25
7. Greene W.H. LIMDEP Version 8.0: User's Manual (2002), Econometric Software, Inc., Plainview, NY
8. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. fifth ed. (2003), Pearson Education, Inc., NJ
9. Hensher D.A., and Reyes A.J. Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport. Transportation 27 4 (2000) 341-361
10. Maddala G.S. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
11. McGuckin, N., Murakami, E., 1999. Examining trip-chaining behavior: a comparison of travel by men and women. Transportation Research Record 1693. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 79-85.
12. Ouyang, Y., Shankar, V., Yamamoto, T., 2002. Modeling the simultaneity in injury causation in multi-vehicle collisions. Transportation Research Record 1784. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 143-152.
13. Pendyala R.M., and Bhat C.R. An exploration of the relationship between timing and duration of maintenance activities. Transportation 31 4 (2004) 429-456
14. Schmidt P., and Strauss R.P. Estimation of models with jointly dependent qualitative variables: a simultaneous logit approach. Econometrica 43 4 (1975) 745-755
15. Shiftan, Y., 1998. Practical approach to model trip chaining. Transportation Research Record 1645. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 17-23.
16. Strathman J.G., and Dueker K.J. Effect of household structure and selected characteristics on trip chaining. Transportation 21 (1994) 23-45
17. Strathman, J.G., Dueker, K.J., 1995. Understanding Trip Chaining. Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes. 1990 NPTS Reports Series. Publication No. FHWA-PL-95-033. US Department of Transportation, pp. 1-1-1-27.
18. Ye, X., Pendyala, R.M., 2003. Description of the Switzerland Microcensus 2000 Travel Survey Sample. Research Report prepared for Jenni+Gottardi AG. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.