Empirical approaches to combining revealed and stated preference data: Some recent developments with reference to urban mode choice

Research in Transportation Economics

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-29

  Hensher, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Combined SP and RP data; Error component mixed logit; Modal elasticities; Nested logit trick; Scale parameters; State dependence

Indexed keywords

EID: 60449099216     PISSN: 07398859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ailawadi K.L., Gedenk K., and Neslin S.A. Heterogeneity and purchase event feedback in choice models: an empirical analysis with implications for model buildings. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16 (1999) 177-198
2. Balcombe R., Mackett R., Paully N., Preston J., Shires J., Titheridge H., et al. The demand for public transport: a practical guide. TRL report, TRL593 (2004).
3. Ben-Akiva M., Bolduc D., and Walker J. Specification, identification and estimation of the logit kernel (or continuous mixed logit) model. MIT Working paper (2001), Department of Civil Engineering
4. Bhat C.R. Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transportation Research B 37 9 (2003) 837-855
5. Bhat C.R., and Castelar S. A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research B 36 (2002) 577-669
6. Bradley, M. A., & Daly A. J. (1992). Uses of the logit scaling approach in stated preference analysis, paper presented at the 7th World Conference on Transport Research, Lyon, July.
7. Bradley M.A., and Daly A.J. Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information. In: Stopher P.R., and Lee-Gosselin M. (Eds). Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change (1997), Pergamon, Oxford 209-232
8. Brownstone D., Bunch D.S., Golob T., and Ren W. A transactions choice model for forecasting demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. In: McMullen S. (Ed). Research in transportation economics Vol. 4 (1996), JAI Press Inc 87-129
9. Brownstone D., Bunch D.S., and Train K. Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research 34B (2000) 315-338
10. Georges B., Dargay J., Madre J.L., and Pirotte A. The main determinants of demand for public transport: a comparative analysis of England and France using shrinkage estimators. Transportation Research Part A 37 (2003) 605-627
11. Glaister, and Lewis. An integrated fares policy for transport in London. Journal of Public Economics 9 (1978) 341-355
12. Goodwin P.B. A review of new demand elasticities with special reference to short and long run effects of price charges. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 26 (1992) 155-170
13. Greene W.H., and Hensher D.A. Mixed logit and heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components. Transportation Research E 43 (2007) 610-623
14. Hensher D.A. Establishing a fare elasticity regime for urban passenger transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 32 2 (1998) 221-246
15. Hensher D.A. HEV choice models as a search engine for specification of nested logit tree structures. Marketing Letters 10 4 (1999) 333-343
16. Hensher D.A. How do respondents handle stated choice experiments? - Attribute processing strategies under varying information load. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21 (2006) 861-878
17. Hensher D.A. Assessing systematic sources of variation in public transport fare and service elasticities: Some comparative warnings. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies Working Paper (2007), The University of Sydney
18. Hensher D.A., and Bradley M. Using stated response data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Marketing Letters 4 2 (1993) 139-152
19. Hensher D.A., and Greene W.H. Mixed logit models: state of practice. Transportation 30 2 (2003) 133-176
20. Hensher D.A., Rose J., and Greene W.H. Applied choice analysis: A primer (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. In: Makridakis S., and Wheelwright S.C. (Eds). Forecasting (2008), North-Holland Pub. co, New York, NY 313-327
22. Kremers H., Nijkamp P., and Rietveld P. A meta-analysis of price elasticities of transport demand in a general equilibrium framework. Economic Modelling 19 (2002) 463-485
23. Litman T. Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities - For urban transportation demand modeling (October 2002), Victoria Transport Policy Institute
24. Litman T. Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities. Journal of Public Transportation 7 2 (2005) 37-58
25. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J. Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. In: Gustafsson A., Herrmann A., and Huber F. (Eds). Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications (1999), Springer, Berlin 279-318 Reprinted edition 3 (2003), 305-370
26. Luk, J., & Hepburn, S. (1993). New review of Australian travel demand elasticities, ARRB Research Report 249. Vermont South, Victoria: Australian Road Research Board.
27. McFadden D.L. Econometric models of probabilistic choice in structural analysis of discrete data. In: Manski C.F., and McFadden D.L. (Eds) (1981), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 198-271
28. Oum T.H., Waters II W.G., and Yong J.-S. Concepts of price elasticities of transport demand and recent empirical estimates. An interpretative survey. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 26 (1992) 139-154
29. Revelt D., and Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1998) 1-11
30. Taplin J.H.E., Hensher D.A., and Smith B. Imposing symmetry on a complete matrix of commuter travel elasticities. Transportation Research 33B (1999) 215-232
31. Train K. A comparison of hierarchical Bayes and maximum simulated likelihood for mixed logit. Working paper (2001), Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/∼train/compare.pdf
32. Train K.E. Discrete choice methods with simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge