Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: A cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Egarter, Christian ^a   Frey Tirri, Brigitte ^b   Bitzer, Johannes ^c   Kaminskyy, Vyacheslav ^d   Oddens, Björn J ^e   Prilepskaya, Vera ^f   Yeshaya, Arie ^g   Marintcheva Petrova, Maya ^e   Weyers, Steven ^h  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Kantonsspital Baselland ^*  (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^d SHUPYK NATIONAL MEDICAL ACADEMY OF POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION   (Ukraine)

^e NV ORGANON   (Netherlands)

^f RESEARCH CENTER OF OBSTETRICS   (Russian Federation)

^g TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^h GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Combined oral contraceptive; Contraceptive transdermal patch; Contraceptive vaginal ring; Counseling; Perception; Reason

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENSTRUATION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PERCEPTION; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EUROPE; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874365254     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010, 15(Suppl 2):S42-53.
2. World contraceptive use 2011 [http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/wallchart_front.pdf].
3. Report TRH. The Reproductive Health Report: the state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011, 16(Suppl 1):S1-S70.
4. Teutsch C. Patient-doctor communication. Med Clin North Am 2003, 87(5):1115-1145. 10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00066-X, 14621334.
5. Lete I, Doval JL, Perez-Campos E, Sanchez-Borrego R, Correa M, de la Viuda E, Gomez MA, Gonzalez JV, Lertxundi R, Martinez MT. Factors affecting women's selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study. Contraception 2007, 76(2):77-83. 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.014, 17656174.
6. Bitzer J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Roumen F, Marintcheva-Petrova M, van Bakel B, Oddens BJ. The CHOICE study: effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012, 17(1):65-78. 10.3109/13625187.2011.637586, 22239264.
7. Egarter C, Grimm C, Nouri K, Ahrendt HJ, Bitzer J, Cermak C. Contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices: results of the CHOICE study in Austria. Reprod Biomed Online 2012, 24(7):692-697. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.003, 22285247.
8. Fait T. Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women. Ceska Gynekol 2011, 76(3):190-193.
9. Fait T, Apetauer I. Importance of the consultation for combined hormonal contraception's choice-results of CHOICE project in Czech and Slovak Republic. Ceska Gynekol 2011, 76(2):140-144.
10. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Thunell L, Lindeberg M, Tyden T, Marintcheva-Petrova M, Oddens BJ. Comprehensive counseling about combined hormonal contraceptives changes the choice of contraceptive methods: results of the CHOICE program in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011, 90(8):869-877. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01180.x, 21564028.
11. Merckx M, Donders GG, Grandjean P, Van de Sande T, Weyers S. Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice?. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011, 16(6):418-429. 10.3109/13625187.2011.625882, 3250999, 22066890.
12. Merki-Feld GS, Gruber IM. Intention to use a combined contraceptive method and decision after counselling in Switzerland - Swiss data from the European CHOICE study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012, 17(2):119-127. 10.3109/13625187.2011.630114, 22200096.
13. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, Hoboken NJ. Applied Logistic Regression 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2.
14. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004, 9(2):57-68. 10.1080/13625180410001715681, 15449817.
15. Ekstrand M, Larsson M, Von Essen L, Tyden T. Swedish teenager perceptions of teenage pregnancy, abortion, sexual behavior, and contraceptive habits-a focus group study among 17-year-old female high-school students. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005, 84(10):980-986.
16. Grossman D, Fernandez L, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Potter JE. Perceptions of the safety of oral contraceptives among a predominantly Latina population in Texas. Contraception 2010, 81(3):254-260. 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.09.009, 2824619, 20159184.