Upping the Ante of Text Complexity in the Common Core State Standards: Examining Its Potential Impact on Young Readers

Educational Researcher

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 44-51

  Hiebert, Elfrieda H ^a,b   Mesmer, Heidi Anne E ^c  

^a Text Project and University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

analysis reading; elementary schools; literacy; policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874312185     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12459802     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author; 2006:.
2. Afflerbach P.Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning. Osborn J.Lehr F., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1998:239-263.
3. Anderson R. C.,Hiebert E. H.,Scott J. A.,Wilkinson I. A. G.Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Champaign, IL: The Center for the Study of Reading, National Institute of Education, National Academy of Education; 1985:.
4. Chall J. S.Learning to read: The great debate. 1983). Learning to read: The great debate (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1967)Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace; 1983:.
5. Chall J. S.An analysis of textbooks in relation to declining SAT scores. Princeton, NJ: ETS & College Board; 1977:.
6. Chall J. S.Anderson R. C.,Hiebert E. H.,Scott J. A.,Wilkinson I. A. G.Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Champaign, IL: The Center for the Study of Reading, National Institute of Education, National Academy of Education; 1985:123-126.
7. Cohen S. A.,Steinberg J. E.Effects of three types of vocabulary on readability of intermediate grade science textbooks: An application of Finn's transfer feature theory.Reading Research Quarterly. 1983;19 (1): 86-101.
8. Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO & National Governors Association; 2010:.
9. Conner B. E.The box in the barn. Columbus, OH: Highlights for Children, Inc; 1988:.
10. Courlander H.The cow-tail switch & other West African stories. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company, Inc; 1987:.
11. Cramer K.,Rosenfield S.Effect of degree of challenge on reading performance.Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2008;24:119-137.
12. Cunningham J. W.,Spadorcia S. A.,Erickson K. A.,Koppenhaver D. A.,Sturm J. M.,Yoder D. E.Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts.Reading Research Quarterly. 2005;40:410-427.
13. Daane M. C.,Campbell J. R.,Grigg W. S.,Goodman M. J.,Oranje A.Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2005:.
14. Dale E.,Chall J. S.A formula for predicting readability.Educational Research Bulletin. 1948;27:11 37-20 54.
15. Davison A.,Kantor R. N.On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations.Reading Research Quarterly. 1982;17 (2): 187-209.
16. Day C.Handbook of teacher education. Townsend T.Bates R., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2007:597-612.
17. Deane P.Sheehan K. M.,Sabatini J.,Futagi Y.,Kostin I.Differences in text structure and its implications for assessment of struggling readers.Scientific Studies of Reading. 2006;10 (3): 257-275.
18. DiPardo A.,Storms B. A.,Selland M.Seeing voices: Assessing writerly stance in the NWP Analytic Writing Continuum.Assessing Writing. 2011;16 (3): 170-188.
19. Dunn L.,Markwardt F.Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1970:.
20. Foorman B. R.,Connor C. M.Handbook of reading research. Kamil M. L.Pearson P. D.Moje E. B.Afflerbach P. P., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:136-156.
21. Foorman B. R.,Francis D. J.,Davidson K. C.,Harm M. W.,Griffin J.Variability in text features in six grade 1 basal reading programs.Scientific Studies of Reading. 2004;8 (2): 167-197.
22. Fountas I. C.,Pinnell G. S.The Fountas and Pinnell leveled book list: K-8+. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 2009:.
23. Gamse B. C.,Jacob R. T.,Horst M.,Boulay B.,Unlu F.Reading First impact study final report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2008:.
24. Guthrie J. T.,Hoa A. L. W.,Wigfield A.,Tonks S. M.,Humenick N. M.,Littles E.Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2007;32:282-313.
25. Guthrie J. T.,Wigfield A.,You W.Handbook of research on student engagement. Christenson S. L.Reschly A. L.Wylie C., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2012:601-644.
26. Hayes D. P.,Wolfer L. T.,Wolfe M. F.Schoolbook simplification and its relation to the decline in SAT-Verbal Scores.American Educational Research Journal. 1996;33 (2): 489-508.
27. Hemingway E.The sun also rises. New York, NY: Scribner; 1926:.
28. Hernandez D. J.Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation; 2011:.
29. Hiebert E. H.What research has to say about reading instruction. 2002). Standards, assessment, and text difficulty. In FarstrupA. E.SamuelsS. J. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 337-369). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Farstrup A. E.Samuels S. J., ed. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; 2002:337-369.
30. Hiebert E. H.Finding the right texts for beginning and struggling readers: Research-based solutions. Hiebert E. H.Sailors M., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2008:1-21.
31. Hiebert E. H.,Pearson P. D.An examination of current text difficulty indices with early reading texts. Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject, Inc; 2010:.
32. Koslin B. L.,Zeno S.,Koslin S.The DRP: An effective measure in reading. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board; 1987:.
33. Linn R.Assessments and accountability.Educational Researcher. 2000;29 (2): 4-16.
34. Lively B. A.,Pressey S. L.A method for measuring the vocabulary burden of textbooks.Educational Administration and Supervision. 1923;9:389-398.
35. Markow D.,Pieters A.The MetLife survey of the American teacher. New York, NY: MetaLife Foundation; 2012:.
36. Mesmer H. A.Tools for matching readers to texts. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:.
37. Mesmer H. A.,Cunningham J. W.,Hiebert E. H.Toward a theoretical model of primary-grade text complexity: Learning from the past, anticipating the future.Reading Research Quarterly. 2012;47 (3): 235-258.
38. MetaMetrics. (2000). The Lexile framework for reading. Durham, NC: Author. Retrieved from: http://lexile.com\about\_meta\press\21098b.htm.
39. Milone M.The development of ATOS: The Renaissance readability formula. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning, Inc; 2009:.
40. Milton J.Bats: Creatures of the night. New York, NY: Grosset & Dunlap; 1993:.
41. Mullis I. V. S.,Martin M. O.,Gonzalez E. J.,Kennedy A. M.PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA's study of reading literacy achievement in primary school in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College; 2003:.
42. The nation's report card: Reading 2011. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2011:.
43. Nelson J.,Perfetti C.,Liben D.,Liben M.Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade levels and student performance. New York, NY: Student Achievement Partners; 2012:.
44. O'Connor R. E.,Bell K. M.,Harty K. R.,Larkin L. K.,Sackor S. M.,Zigmond N.Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002;94 (3): 474-485.
45. Olsen B.,Sexton D.Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts.American Educational Research Journal. 2009;46 (1): 9-44.
46. Paine T.Common sense. New York, NY: Penguin; 2005:.
47. Pearson P. D.The effects of grammatical complexity on children's comprehension, recall, and conception of certain semantic relations.Reading Research Quarterly. 1974;10:155-192.
48. Pearson P. D.,Hiebert E. H.,Kamil M. L.Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to know.Reading Research Quarterly. 2007;42:282-296.
49. PimenthalS. (2011, January26). The Common Core State Standards: Supporting districts and teachers with text complexity. Webinar presented through the Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Digital_Resources/The_Common_Core_State_Standards_Supporting_Districts_and_Teachers_with_Text_Complexity.html.
50. Pinnell G. S.,Pikulski J. J.,Wixson K. K.,Campbell J. R.,Gough P. B.,Beatty A. S.Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP's integrated reading performance record (IRPR) at grade 4. Washington, DC Princeton, NJ: OERI, U.S. Department of Education ETS; 1995:.
51. Porter A.,McMaken J.,Hwang J.,Yang R.Common Core Standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum.Educational Researcher. 2011;40 (3): 103-116.
52. Robelen E. W.More states retaining 3rd graders.Education Week. 2012;31 1 (26): 15.
53. Schiefele U.Interest and learning from text.Scientific Studies of Reading. 1999;3 (3): 257-279.
54. Shepard L. A.The future of test-based educational accountability. Ryan K. E.Shepard L. A., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008:25-46.
55. Smith D.,Stenner A. J.,Horabin I.,Smith M.The Lexile scale in theory and practice. Washington, DC: MetaMetrics; 1989:.
56. Snow C. E.,Biancarosa G.Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here?. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York; 2003:.
57. Spache G.A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials.The Elementary School Journal. 1953;53:410-413.
58. Multiple measures for text complexity calibrated for college and career readiness. New York, NY: Author; 2012:.
59. Twist L.,Gnaldi M.,Schagen I.,Morrison J.Good readers but at a cost? Attitudes to reading in England.Journal of Research in Reading. 2004;27:387-400.
60. Tyson-Bernstein H.A conspiracy of good intentions: America's textbook fiasco. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education; 1988:.
61. Ward R. E.,Burke M. A.Improving achievement in low-performing schools: Key results for school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2004:.
62. WhiteS.ClementsJ. (2001). Assessing the Lexile framework: Results of a panel meeting (Working Paper No. 2001-08). Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=200108.
63. Williamson G. L.Aligning the journey with a destination: A model for K-16 reading standards. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics; 2006:.
64. Williamson G. L.A text readability continuum for postsecondary readiness.Journal of Advanced Academics. 2008;19 (4): 602-632.
65. Zeno S. M.,Ivens S. H.,Millard R. T.,Duvvuri R.The educator's word frequency guide. New York, NY: TASA; 1995:.