Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 524-529

  Legrand, I ^a   Hocquette, J F ^b   Polkinghorne, R J ^c   Pethick, D W ^d  

^a MRAL   (France)

^b UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

^c not available   (Australia)

^d MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

beef quality; consumers; palatability; prediction; sensory evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873867568     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001553     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ferguson D, Thompson J and Polkinghorne R 1999. Meat Standards Australia, a "PACCP" based beef grading scheme for consumers. 3) PACCP requirements which apply to carcass processing. Book of Abstracts of the 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 18-19.
2. Hocquette JF and Chatellier V 2011. Prospects for the European beef sector over the next 30 years. Animal Frontiers 1, 20-28.
3. Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baéza E, Médale F, Jurie C and Pethick DW 2010. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, identification of putative markers. Animal 4, 303-319.
4. Hocquette JF, Legrand I, Jurie C, Pethick D and Micol D 2011a. Perception of the Australian system for the prediction of beef quality (MSA) with perspectives for the European beef sector. Animal Production Science 51, 30-36.
5. Hocquette JF, Lehnert S, Barendse W, Cassar-Malek I and Picard B 2007. Recent advances in cattle functional genomics and their application to beef quality. Animal 1, 159-173. (Pubitemid 46450958)
6. Hocquette JF, Meurice P, Brun JP, Jurie C, Denoyelle C, Bauchart D, Renand G, Nute GR and Picard B 2011b. The challenge and limitations of combining data: a case study examining the relationship between intramuscular fat content and flavour intensity based on the BIF-BEEF database. Animal Production Science 51, 975-981.
7. Hwang IH, Polkinghorne R, Lee JM and Thompson JM 2008. Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1387-1395.
8. Jurie C, Cassar-Malek I, Bonnet M, Leroux C, Bauchart D, Boulesteix P, Pethick DW and Hocquette JF 2007. Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and mitochondrial enzyme activities in muscles as relevant indicators of marbling in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2660-2669. (Pubitemid 47606282)
9. Lyford C, Thompson JT, Polkinghorne RJ, Miller MF, Nishimura T, Neath K, Allen P and Belasco E 2010. Is willingness to pay (WTP) for beef quality grades affected by consumer demographics and meat consumption preferences? Australasian Agribusiness Review 18, 1-17.
10. Moë vi I, Hocquette JF, Jurie C and Micol D 2008a. Expertise du système australien de prédiction de la qualitéde la viande bovine (MSA). Quelles perspectives pour la filiè re française ? Compte rendu n8 170832010 (TEND-06-058). Institut de l'Elevage, Inra, Interbev, Office de l'Elevage, Paris, France.
11. Moëvi I, Hocquette JF, Jurie C and Micol D 2008b. The Australian beef eating quality prediction model MSA: presentation, scientific and professional assessment. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants 15, 97-100.
12. Perry D, Shorthose WR, Ferguson DM and Thompson JM 2001. Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 953-957. (Pubitemid 33030563)
13. Polkinghorne R, Watson R, Porter M, Gee A, Scott J and Thompson J 1999. Meat Standards Australia, a "PACCP" based beef grading scheme for consumers. 1) The use of consumer scores to set grade standards. Book of Abstracts of the 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 14-15.
14. Smith GC, Tatum JD and Belk KE 2008. International perspective: characterization of United States Department of Agriculture and Meat Standards Australia systems for assessing beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1465-1480.
15. Thompson JM 2002. Managing meat tenderness. Meat Science 60, 365-369.
16. Thompson J, Polkinghorne R, Hearnshaw H and Ferguson D 1999a. Meat Standards Australia, a "PACCP" based beef grading scheme for consumers. 2) PACCP requirements which apply to the production sector. Book of Abstracts of the 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 16-17.
17. Thompson J, Polkinghorne R, Watson R, Gee A and Murison B 1999b. Meat Standards Australia, a "PACCP" based beef grading scheme for consumers. 4) A cut based grading scheme to predict eating quality by cooking method. Book of Abstracts of the 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 20-21.
18. Thompson JM, Polkinghorne R, Hwang IH, Gee AM, Cho SH, Park BY and Lee JM 2008. Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1380-1386.
19. Thompson JM, Polkinghorne RJ, Gee A, Motiang D, Strydom P, Mashau M, Ng'ambi J, de Kock R and Burrow H 2010. Beef palatability in the Republic of South Africa: implications for niche-marketing strategies. ACIAR Technical Reports 72. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, Australia.
20. Verbeke W, Wezemael LV, de Barcellos MD, Kügler JO, Hocquette JF, Ueland O and Grunert KG 2010. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eatingquality guarantee: insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite 54, 289-296.
21. Watson R, Gee A, Polkinghorne R and Porter M 2008a. Consumer assessment of eating quality-development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1360-1367.
22. Accessory publication: http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act5view- file&file-id5 EA07176-AC.pdf
23. Watson R, Polkinghorne R and Thompson JM 2008b. Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1368-1379.