Perception in France of the Australian system for the prediction of beef quality (Meat Standards Australia) with perspectives for the European beef sector

Animal Production Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 30-36

  Hocquette, J F ^a   Legrand, I ^b   Jurie, C ^a   Pethick, D W ^c   Micol, D ^a  

^a UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

^b Institut de l'Elevage   (France)

^c MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATTLE; DATABASE; MEAT; PERCEPTION; PRESERVATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STANDARD (REFERENCE);

ANIMALIA;

EID: 78650427048     PISSN: 18360939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AN10045     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bastien D (2002) 'La suspension pelvienne des carcasses de gros bovins: Quantification du gain de tendreté procuré par cette technique et contraintes pratiques de mise en oeuvre.' Compte rendu final No. 2023208. (Institut de l'Elevage: Interbev, Ofival, Paris)
2. Boulesteix P (2006) Congrès mondial Limousin en Australie, une expérience enrichissante (1ère partie). Bovins Limousins 168, 46-51.
3. Adapted from The Australian Beef Industry, Prepared for the International Limousin Conference by Meat & Livestock Australia, Melbourne, April 2006.
4. Culioli J (1999) La qualité de la viande bovine: aspects biologiques et technologiques de la gestion de la tendreté. Bulletin de l'Academie Veterinaire de France 72, 25-46.
5. Denoyelle C, Lebihan E (2004) Intramuscular variation in beef tenderness. Meat Science 66, 241-247. doi:10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00097-4 (Pubitemid 37053777)
6. Dransfield E, Martin J-F, Bauchart D, Abouelkaram S, Lepetit J, Culioli J, Jurie C, Picard B (2003) Meat quality and composition of three muscles from French cull cows and young bulls. Animal Science 76, 387-399. (Pubitemid 36784665)
7. Geay Y, Bauchart D, Hocquette JF, Culioli J (2001) Effect of nutritional factorsonbiochemical,structural andmetabolic characteristicsofmuscles in ruminants; consequences on dietetic value and sensorial qualities of meat. Reproduction Nutrition Development 41, 1-26. (Pubitemid 32433114)
8. Erratum 41, 377.
9. Goutefongea R, Valin C (1978) Study of bovine meat quality. 2. Comparison of the organoleptic properties of cow and young bull meat. Annales de Technologie Agricole 27, 609-627.
10. Griffith G, Rodgers H, Thompson J, Dart C (2009) The aggregate economic benefits to 2007/02 from the adoption of Meat Standards Australia. Australasian Agribusiness Review 17, 94-114.
11. Grunert KG (2005) Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agriculture Economics 32, 369-391. doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011 (Pubitemid 41442734)
12. Grunert KG (2006) Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science 74, 149-160. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci. 2006.04.016
13. Grunert KG, Bredahl L, Brunsø K (2004) Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-a review. Meat Science 66, 259-272. doi:10.1016/S0309-1740 (03)00130-X (Pubitemid 37326326)
14. Hocquette JF, Richardson RI, Prache S, Médale F, Duffy G, Scollan ND (2005) The future trends for research on quality and safety of animal products. Italian Journal of Animal Science 4(Suppl. 3), 49-72.
15. Hocquette JF, Lehnert S, Barendse W, Cassar-Malek I, Picard B (2007) Recent advances in cattle functional genomics and their applicationto beef quality. Animal 1, 159-173. doi:10.1017/S175173110 7658042 (Pubitemid 46450958)
16. INAO (2009) Notice technique définissant les critères minimaux à remplir pour l'obtention d'un label rouge en 'Gros bovins de boucherie'. Available at http://www.inao.gouv.fr/public/home.phppageFromIndex= textesPages/Label-rouge-(Guides-et-NT)410.php~mnu=410 [Verified November 2010]
17. Moëvi I, Hocquette JF, Jurie C, Micol D (2008) Expertise du système australien de prédiction de la qualité de la viande bovine (MSA). Quelles perspectives pour la filière française? CR No. 170832010. Institut de l'Elevage, Inra, Interbev, Office de l'Elevage.
18. Oliver MA, Nute GR, Furnols MFI, San Julian R, Campo MM, et al. (2006) Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers. Meat Science 74, 435-442. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci. 2006.03.010 (Pubitemid 44177698)
19. Oury MP, Micol D, Laboure H, Roux M, Dumont R (2005) Assessmentofthe impact of herd management on sensorial quality of Charolais heifer meat. In 'Indicators of milk and beef quality'. EAAP publication 112. (Eds JF Hocquette, S Gigli) pp. 447-451. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)
20. Perry D, Thompson JM (2005) The effect of growth rate during backgrounding and finishing on meat quality traits in beef cattle. Meat Science 69, 691-702. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.10.020 (Pubitemid 40119924)
21. Polkinghorne R, Watson R, Thompson JM, Pethick DW (2008) Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1459-1464. doi:10.1071/EA07175
22. Purchas RW, Aungsupakorn R (1993) Further investigations into the relationship between ultimate pH and tenderness for beef samples from bulls and steers. Meat Science 34, 163-178. doi:10.1016/0309-1740(93) 90025-D
23. Rhee MS, Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M (2004) Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. Journal of Animal Science 82, 534-550. (Pubitemid 38572386)
24. Smith GC, Tatum JD, Belk KE (2008) International perspective: characterisation of United States Department of Agriculture and Meat Standards Australia systems for assessing beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1465-1480. doi:10.1071/EA08198
25. Thompson JM (2004) The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 645-652. doi:10.1071/EA02171 (Pubitemid 39225252)
26. Thompson JM, Polkinghorne R, Hwang IH, Gee AM, Cho SH, Park BY, Lee JM (2008) Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1380-1386. doi:10.1071/EA05111
27. Verbeke W, Wezemael LV, de Barcellos MD, Kügler JO, Hocquette JF, Ueland O, Grunert KG (2010) European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee: insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite 54, 289-296. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009. 11.013
28. Watson R, Gee A, Polkinghorne R, Porter M (2008a) Consumer assessment of eating quality-development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1360-1367. doi:10.1071/EA07176
29. Watson R, Polkinghorne R, Thompson JM (2008b) Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1368-1379. doi:10.1071/EA07184
30. Warriss PD, Kestin SC, Brown SN, Wilkins LJ (1984) The time required for recovery from mixing stress in young bulls and the prevention of dark cutting beef. Meat Science 10, 53-68.
31. Wheeler TL, Cundiff LV, Kock RM (1994) Effectof marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 72, 3145-3151.