Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 53-63

  Launay, Jacques ^a   Dean, Roger T ^a   Bailes, Freya ^a  

^a WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Agency; Synchronization; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873811583     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000173     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amazeen, P. G., Schmidt, R. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1995). Frequency detuning of the phase entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 511-518.
2. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Iacoboni, M., Zaidel, E., Wilson, S., & Mazziotta, J. (2004). Left hemisphere motor facilitation in response to manual action sounds. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2609-2612.
3. Bailenson, J., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons. Psychological Science, 16, 814-819.
4. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & Mccabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142.
5. Buchan, N. R., Johnson, E. J., & Croson, R. T. A. (2006). Let's get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 373-398.
6. Caetano, G., Jousmaki, V., & Hari, R. (2007). Actor's and observer's primary motor cortices stabilize similarly after seen or heard motor actions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 9058-9062.
7. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
8. Chartrand, T. L., Maddux, W. W., & Lakin, J. L. (2005). Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 334-361). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9. Cinzia, D. D., & Vittorio, G. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: A review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 682-687.
10. Cochard, F., Van, P. N., & Willinger, M. (2004). Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 31-44.
11. Demos, A. P., Chaffin, R., Begosh, K. T., Daniels, J. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2012). Rocking to the beat: Effects of music and partner's movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 49-53.
12. Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 197-203.
13. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811-846.
15. Godøy, R. I. (2003). Motor-mimetic music cognition. Leonardo, 36, 317-319.
16. Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 14, 21-51.
17. Hove, M. J. (2008). Shared circuits, shared time, and interpersonal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 29-30.
18. Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27, 949-960.
19. Isen, A. M. (1970). Success, failure, attention, and reaction to others: The warm glow of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 294-301.
20. Issartel, J., Marin, L., & Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: ''Can we march to the beat of our own drum?''. Neuroscience Letters, 411, 174-179.
21. Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A metaanalysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865-889.
22. Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 299-314.
23. Kokal, I., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment-if the rhythm comes easy. PLos ONE, 6, e27272. doi: 27210.21371/journal.pone. 0027272
24. Kolakoski, W., & Ucoluk, N. (1966). Self generating runs, problem 5304. The American Mathematical Monthly, 73, 681-682.
25. Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2220-2230.
26. Kurzban, R. (2001). The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 241-259.
27. Lahav, A., Saltzman, E., & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308-314.
28. Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 701-708.
29. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145-162.
30. Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K., & Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand waving: Action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109, 152-156.
31. Maddux, W. W., Mullen, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 461-468.
32. Madison, G., & Merker, B. (2004). Human sensorimotor tracking of continuous subliminal deviations from isochrony. Neuroscience Letters, 370, 69-73.
33. Mardia, K. V., & Jupp, P. E. (2000). Directional statistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
34. Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., Lane, A., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., & Luminet, O. (2010). Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychological Science, 21, 1072-1074.
35. Miles, L. K., Griffiths, J. L., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). Too late to coordinate: Contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 52-60.
36. Miles, L. K., Lumsden, J., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, N. C. (2011). Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioral synchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 495-503.
37. Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., Henderson, Z., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). Moving memories: Behavioral synchrony and memory for self and others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 457-460.
38. Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 585-589.
39. Molnar-Szakacs, I., & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to 'e'motion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 235-241.
40. Oullier, O., De Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3, 178-192.
41. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
42. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867-891.
43. Schmidt, R., & O'Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9, 189-206.
44. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76.
45. Sommerville, J. A., & Decety, J. (2006). Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 179-200.
46. Steinbeis, N., & Koelsch, S. (2009). Understanding the intentions behind man-made products elicits neural activity in areas dedicated to mental state attribution. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 619-623.
47. Swaab, R. I., Maddux, W. W., & Sinaceur, M. (2011). Early words that work: When and how virtual linguistic mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 616-621.
48. Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 8190-8195.
49. Tsai, C. C., Kuo, W. J., Jing, J. T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). A common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353-362.
50. Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11, 262-266.
51. Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693-695.
52. Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1-5.