Neuroaesthetics: a review

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 682-687

  Di Dio, Cinzia ^a   Vittorio, Gallese ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ART; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EMOTIONALITY; ESTHETICS; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INSULA; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROESTHETICS; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; ORBITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 72549087352     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Zeki S. Art and the brain. J Conscious Stud: Controvers Sci Humanit 6 (1999) 76-96
2. Reber R., Schwarz N., and Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8 (2004) 364-382
3. Leder H., Belke B., Oeberst A., and Augustin D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol 95 (2004) 489-508
4. Locher P., Krupinski E.A., Mello-Thoms C., and Nodine C.F. Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spat Vis 21 1-2 (2007) 55-77
5. Kawabata H., and Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91 (2004) 1699-1705
6. Vartanian O., and Goel V. Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport 15 (2004) 893-897
7. Delgado M.R., Locke H.M., Stenger V.A., and Fiez J.A. Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3 (2000) 27-38
8. Devinsky O., Morrell M.J., and Vogt B.A. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour (review article). Brain 118 1 (1995) 279-306
9. Cela-Conde C.J., Ayala F.J., Munar E., Maestú F., Nadal M., Capò M.A., del Rio D., Lopez-Ibor J.J., Ortiz T., Mirasso C., and Marty G. Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 (2009) 3847-3852. This is a pioneer work in the neural exploration of gender-related differences in the appreciation of artworks. The use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) allows to study the various temporal stages at which stimuli are processed. Through this technique, it was possible to pinpoint fine gender-differences in parietal regions, which are then discussed by the authors from an evolutionary perspective.
10. Cupchik G.C., Vartanian O., Crawley A., and Mikulis D.J. Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cognit 70 1 (2009) 84-91. This investigation suggests that 'aesthetic attitude' is fundamental in the appreciation of a stimulus as an artwork and that, under this mind-state, individuals respond to the aesthetic properties of the observed objects by means of a top-down control, possibly exerted by the lateral prefrontal cortex. In this work, the authors were able to specifically address one of the aspects of aesthetic experience, namely the interaction between top-down orienting of attention and bottom-up perceptual facilitation processes, and to shed light on the emotional aspect underlying aesthetic experiences.
11. Fogassi L., and Luppino G. Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15 6 (2005) 626-631
12. Jacobsen T., Schubots R.I., Höfel L., and v. Cramon D.V. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage 29 (2006) 276-285
13. Di Dio C., Macaluso E., and Rizzolatti G. The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE 11 (2007) e1201. In this fMRI study, one stimulus type (Classical and Renaissance sculptures) that was modified on one aesthetic dimension (i.e. proportion) was used to investigate both spontaneous brain responses at stimuli presentation during 'observation' condition and the neural correlates associated with overt aesthetic appraisal during the 'aesthetic judgment' condition. Through this methodology, it was possible to unfold basic processes underpinning the feelings and emotions associated with aesthetic experience. Of course, other processes are in place during the building up of an aesthetic experience; though, this study shows a possible methodological approach to address such processes in a specific manner.
14. Freedberg D., and Gallese V. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cognit Sci 11 (2007) 197-203. This paper offers a good opportunity to explore theoretically embodiment theories of motor perception within the artistic domain and to establish a relationship between empathy and aesthetics. The importance of empathy in aesthetics is not a new concept. Still, this paper nicely reconciles philosophical and neurophysiological theories to support the importance of the motor system also in mediating a very subtle and unique cognitive human ability: that of art appreciation.
15. Vischer R. Über das optische Formgefühl: ein Beiträg zur Ästhetik (1873), Credner
16. Warburg A, Britt D (transl.), Forster KW (Introduction): The Renewal of Pagan Antiquity. The Getty Research Institute; 1999.
17. Berenson B. The Florentine Painters of the Renaissance (1896), G.P. Putnam's Sons
18. Rizzolatti G., and Sinigaglia C. Mirrors in the brain. How Our Minds Share Actions, Emotions, and Experience (2007), Oxford University Press
19. Cupchik G.C., and László J. Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process Psychology Semiology and Philosophy (1992), Cambridge University Press
20. Höfel L., and Jacobsen T. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: spontaneous or intentional processes?. Int J Psychophysiol 65 (2007) 20-31
21. Smith C.U.M. Evolutionary neurobiology and aesthetics. Perspect Biol Med 48 1 (2005) 17-30
22. Damasio A. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (1999), Harcourt Brace, New York
23. Damasio A.R., Grabowski T.J., Bechara A., Damasio H., Ponto L.L., Parvizi J., and Hichwa R.D. Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nat Neurosci 3 (2000) 1049-1056
24. Phelps E.A., and LeDoux J.E. Contribution of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behaviour. Neuron 48 (2005) 175-187
25. Koelsch S., and Siebel W.A. Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends Cognit Sci 9 (2005) 578-584
26. Menon V., and Levitin D.J. The rewards of music listening: response and physiological connectivity of the mesolimbic system. Neuroimage 28 (2005) 175-184
27. Koelsch S., Fritz T., von Cramon D.Y., Muller K., and Friederici A.D. Investigating emotion with music: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Map 27 (2006) 239-250
28. Molnar-Szakacs I., and Overy K. Music and mirror neurons: from motion to 'e'motion. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 1 3 (2006) 235-241
29. Calvo-Merino B., Jola C., Glaser D.E., and Haggard P. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Conscious Cognit 17 (2008) 911-922