Morphologic and functional assessment of coronary artery disease - Potential application of computed tomography angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging

Circulation Journal

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 411-417

  Motoyama, Sadako ^a   Sarai, Masayoshi ^a   Inoue, Kaori ^a   Kawai, Hideki ^a   Ito, Hajime ^a   Harigaya, Hiroto ^a   Takada, Kayoko ^a   Sanda, Yoshihiro ^a   Anno, Hirofumi ^a   Naruse, Hiroyuki ^a   Ishii, Junnichi ^a   Ozaki, Yukio ^a  

^a FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography angiography; High risk plaque; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Risk stratification

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GATED SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE STRESS; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ANGINA, UNSTABLE; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84873810097     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0688     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Coronary arteries: Diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography: Meta-analysis. Radiology 2007; 245: 720-731.
2. Budoff M, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment byCoronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1724-1732.
3. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Eng J Med 2008; 359: 2324-2336.
4. Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Leitritz M, Janzen J, Kopp AF, Herdeg C, et al. Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: A comparison with histology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 449-454.
5. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, Meisner C, Kuettner A, Georg C, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1430-1435.
6. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1241-1247.
7. Pohle K, Achenbach S, MacNeil B, Ropers D, Ferencik M, Moselewski F, et al. Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: Comparison to IVUS. Atherosclerosis 2007; 190: 174-180.
8. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Anno H, Sugiura A, Ito Y, Mori K, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by 0.5-mm-slice multislice computed tomographic imaging. Circ J 2007; 71: 363-366.
9. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 49-57.
10. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, Sugiura A, Harigaya H, Sato T, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 319-326.
11. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Bairey-Merz N, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Gender-related differences in clinical management after exercise nuclear testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1457-1464.
12. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: Differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 535-543.
13. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11: 171-185.
14. Perrone-Filardi P, Costanzo P, Dellegrottaglie S, Garguilo P, Ruggiero D, Savarese G, et al. Prognostic role of myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in the elderly. J Nucl Cardiol 2010; 17: 310-315.
15. Gibbons RJ, Smith SC Jr, Antman E. American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part II: Evolutionary changes in a continuous quality improvement project. Circulation 2003; 107: 3101-3107.
16. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, et al.; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging-Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation 2003; 108: 1404-1418.
17. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging: Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105: 539-542.
18. Bassamd JP, Hamm CW, Ardissiono D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernández-Avilés F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1598-1660.
19. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Koepfli P, Valenta I, Soyka J, Leschka S, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionallyrelevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 1162-1171.
20. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Hack N, Nikolaou K, Becker C, von Ziegler F, et al. Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 4-10.
21. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography withmulti-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2508-2514.
22. Lin F, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ, Weinsaft JW, Wong FJ, et al. Multidetector computed tomography coronary artery plaque predictors of stress-induced myocardial ischemia by SPECT. Atherosclerosis 2008; 197: 700-709.
23. Hachamovitch R, Nutter B, Hlatky MA, Shaw LJ, Ridner ML, Dorbala S, et al. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Anatomy Imaging Roles in Coronary Artery Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 462-474.
24. Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Decramer I, Stokkel MP, et al. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1: 190-199.
25. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TP, Tseng PH, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: Observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1860-1870.
26. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ, et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1161-1170.
27. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Boersma E, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 62-70.
28. Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: Results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2533-2540.
29. Cheng VY, Berman DS, Rozanski A, Dunning AM, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, et al. Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: Results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: An international multicenter registry (CONFIRM). Circulation 2011; 124: 2423-2432.
30. Lin FY, Shaw LJ, Dunning AM, Labounty TM, Choi JH, Weinsaft JW, et al. Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: A prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 510-519.
31. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1237-1247.
32. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O, Jukema JW, Boersma E, Wijns W, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 623-632.
33. Inoue K, Motoyama S, Sarai M, Sato T, Harigaya H, Hara T, et al. Serial coronary CT angiography-verified changes in plaque characteristics as an endpoint in progression-regression trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2010; 3: 691-698.
34. Hosokawa K, Kurata A, Kido T, Shikata F, Imagawa H, Kawachi K, et al. Transmural perfusion gradient in adenosine triphosphate stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography. Circ J 2011; 75: 1905-1912.
35. Kiriyama T, Toba M, Fukushima Y, Hayashi H, Takano H, Mizuno K, et al. Discordance between the morphological and physiological information of 64-slice MSCT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate to high probability of coronary artery disease. Circ J 2011; 75: 1670-1677.