Discordance between the morphological and physiological information of 64-slice MSCT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate to high probability of coronary artery disease

Circulation Journal

Volumn 75, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1670-1677

  Kiriyama, Tomonari ^a   Toba, Masahiro ^a   Fukushima, Yoshimitsu ^a   Hayashi, Hiromitsu ^a   Takano, Hitoshi ^a   Mizuno, Kyoichi ^a   Kumita, Shin ichiro ^a  

^a NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Coronary atherosclerosis; Coronary CT angiography; Myocardial perfusion imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART PERFUSION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 79959689118     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-1123     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: A prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 2135-2144.
2. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Kastrati A, Martinoff S, Schömig A. Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 312-318.
3. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, Pena A, Ferencik M, Chae CU, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006; 114: 2251-2260.
4. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, Vollmar C, Nikolaou K, Becker C, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: First clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 1294-1300.
5. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Boersma E, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 62-70.
6. Morise AP, Haddad WJ, Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997; 102: 350-356.
7. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Rreport of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5-40.
8. Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Waechter P, Areeda J, Van Kriekinge S, Sharir T, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: Technical principles and reproducibility. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 712-719.
9. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105: 539-542.
10. Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Wang FP, van Train K, Matzer L, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography: A clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1455-1464.
11. Mazzanti M, Germano G, Kiat H, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Alexanderson E, et al. Identification of severe and extensive coronary artery disease by automatic measurement of transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle in dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1612-1620.
12. Kakhki VR, Sadeghi R, Zakavi SR. Assessment of transient left ventricular dilation ratio via 2-day dipyridamole Tc-99m sestamibi nongated myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2007; 14: 529-536.
13. Odagiri K, Uehara A, Kurata C. Vasodilator stress impairs the left ventricular function obtained with gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circ J 2010; 74: 2666-2673.
14. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Kalff V, Namdar M, Valenta I, Stefani L, et al. Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for threedimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and standalone 64-slice CT angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 1097-1106.
15. Myocardial infarction redefined: A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1502-1513.
16. Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernández-Avilés F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1598-1660.
17. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Kroft LJ, Stokkel MP, Dibbets-Schneider P, et al. Anatomic correlates of a normal perfusion scan using 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 40-45.
18. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. The relationship between non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2508-2514.
19. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death; Differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 535-543.
20. Matsuo S, Nakajima K, Horie M, Nakae I, Nishimura T. Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in Japanese population: A study based on the J-ACCESS Study. Circ J 2008; 72: 611-617.
21. Matsuo S, Nakajima K, Yamasaki Y, Kashiwagi A, Nishimura T. Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging and ventricular function in Japanese asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: A study based on the J-ACCESS-2 database. Circ J 2010; 74: 1916-1921.
22. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O, Jukema JW, Boersma E, Wijns W, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 623-632.
23. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, Gerlach J, de Yang L, Hayes SW, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007; 14: 521-528.
24. Fujimoto S, Wagatsuma K, Uchida Y, Nii H, Nakano M, Toda M, et al. Study of the predictors and lesion characteristics of ischemic heart disease patients with false negative results in stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission tomography. Circ J 2006; 70: 297-303.
25. Høilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Christensen HW, Vach W, Møldrup M, Bartram P, et al. Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: Observational study without post-test referral bias. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 29-34.
26. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1724-1732.