Transmural perfusion gradient in adenosine triphosphate stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography

Circulation Journal

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1905-1912

  Hosokawa, Kohei ^a   Kurata, Akira ^a   Kido, Teruhito ^a   Shikata, Fumiaki ^a   Imagawa, Hiroshi ^a   Kawachi, Kanji ^a   Ogimoto, Akiyoshi ^a   Higaki, Jitsuo ^a   Kido, Tomoyuki ^a   Higashino, Hiroshi ^a   Mochizuki, Teruhito ^a  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adenosine triphosphate; Computed tomography; Myocardial perfusion; Stress test; Transmural extent

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE STRESS MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SCINTIGRAPHY; TRANSMURAL PERFUSION GRADIENT;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED;

EID: 79960833236     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-1144     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grünenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482-1487.
2. Raff G, Gallagher M, O'Neill W, Goldstein J. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-557.
3. Mollet N, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C, Runza G, McFadden E, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318-2323.
4. Leber A, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2354-2360.
5. Matsumoto N, Nagao K, Hirayama A, Sato Y. Non-invasive assessment and clinical strategy of stable coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance imaging, multislice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion SPECT. Circ J 2010; 74: 34-40.
6. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, Vollmar C, Nikolaou K, Becker C, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: First clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 1294-1300.
7. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2508-2514.
8. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, Roguin A, Soil A, Dragu R, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1059-1067.
9. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2816-2821.
10. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J, Shigematsu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: Alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005; 69: 550-557.
11. Blankstein R, Shturman L, Rogers I, Rocha-Filho J, Okada D, Sarwar A, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1072-1084.
12. George R, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller J, Kitagawa K, Chang H, Bluemke D, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: A pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 174-182.
13. Cerqueira M, Weissman N, Dilsizian V, Jacobs A, Kaul S, Laskey W, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002; 18: 539-542.
14. Klocke F, Baird M, Lorell B, Bateman T, Messer J, Berman D, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging - executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1318-1333.
15. Miyagawa M, Kumano S, Sekiya M, Watanabe K, Akutzu H, Imachi T, et al. Thallium-201 myocardial tomography with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1196-1201.
16. Matsumoto N, Sato Y, Suzuki Y, Kasama S, Nakano Y, Kato M, et al. Incremental prognostic value of cardiac function assessed by ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for the prediction of future acute coronary syndrome. Circ J 2008; 72: 2035-2039.
17. Austen W, Edwards J, Frye R, Gensini G, Gott V, Griffith L, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5-40.
18. Scoblionko DP, Brown BG, Mitten S, Caldwell JH, Kennedy JW, Bolson EL, et al. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: Comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 689-693.
19. Hachamovitch R, Hayes S, Friedman J, Cohen I, Berman D. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003; 107: 2900-2907.
20. Otsuka T, Miyachi H, Ibuki C, Toba M, Tokuyama KI, Ishii K, et al. Atypical exercise stress myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in a patient with effort angina pectoris. Circ J 2010; 75: 218-220.
21. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, DiPaula A, Thompson DR, McCarthy WF, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 153-160.
22. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death.1: Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977; 56: 786-794.
23. Nieman K, Shapiro M, Ferencik M, Nomura C, Abbara S, Hoffmann U, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: Contrast-enhanced 64- section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008; 247: 49-56.
24. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Schoepf UJ, Rosenblum MA, Abro JA, Brothers RL, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: Concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010; 4: 127-135.
25. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, Becker A, Becker CR, Schmidt B, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dualsource CT with alternating table positions: Initial experience. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1168-1173.