How women organize social networks different from men

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Szell, Michael ^a,b   Thurner, Stefan ^a,c,d  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FRIEND; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; MALE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORK;

AGGRESSION; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; RISK-TAKING; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873659035     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01214     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Szell, M., Lambiotte, R. & Thurner, S. Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 13636-13641 (2010).
2. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
3. McPherson,M., Smith-Lovin, L.& Cook, J. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 415-444 (2001).
4. Entwisle, B., Faust, K., Rindfuss, R. & Kaneda, T. Networks and contexts: Variation in the structure of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 112, 1495-1533 (2007).
5. Padgett, J. & Ansell, C. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology 1259-1319 (1993).
6. Onnela, J. et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 7332 (2007).
7. Onnela, J. et al. Analysis of a large-scale weighted network of one-to-one human communication. New Journal of Physics 9, 179 (2007).
8. Lambiotte, R. et al. Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks. Physica A 387, 5317-5325 (2008).
9. Hidalgo, C. & Hausmann, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 10570-10575 (2009).
10. Hidalgo, C., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L. & Hausmann, R. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317, 482 (2007).
11. Klimek, P., Hausmann, R. & Thurner, S. Empirical confirmation of creative destruction from world trade data. Arxiv preprint arXiv: 1112.2984 (2011).
12. Newman, M., Forrest, S.&Balthrop, J. Email networks and the spread of computer viruses. Physical Review E 66, 035101 (2002).
13. Boss, M., Elsinger, H., Summer, M. & Thurner, S. Network topology of the interbank market. Quantitative Finance 4, 677-684 (2004). (Pubitemid 40652441)
14. Kyriakopoulos, F., Thurner, S., Puhr, C. & Schmitz, S. Network and eigenvalue analysis of financial transaction networks. The European Physical Journal B 71, 523-531 (2009).
15. Lazer, D. et al. Computational social science. Science 323, 721 (2009).
16. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A. & Christakis, N. Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks 30, 330-342 (2008).
17. Thurner, S., Szell, M. & Sinatra, R. Emergence of good conduct, scaling and Zipf laws in human behavioral sequences in an online worlds. PLoS ONE 7, e29796 (2012).
18. Bainbridge, W. The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science 317, 472 (2007).
19. Castronova, E. Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005).
20. Szell, M. &Thurner, S. Measuring social dynamics in amassive multiplayer online game. Social Networks 32, 313-329 (2010).
21. Castronova, E. On the research value of large games. Games and Culture 1, 163-186 (2006).
22. Johnson, N. et al. Human group formation in online guilds and offline gangs driven by a common team dynamic. Physical Review E 79, 66117 (2009).
23. Henrich, J. et al. "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 795-815 (2005). (Pubitemid 43372783)
24. Smoreda, Z. & Licoppe, C. Gender-specific use of the domestic telephone. Social psychology quarterly 238-252 (2000).
25. Stoica, A., Smoreda, Z., Prieur, C. & Guillaume, J. Age, gender and communication networks. In NetMob-Analysis of Mobile Phone Networks 2010 communication proposal (2010).
26. Fox, A., Bukatko, D., Hallahan, M. & Crawford, M. The medium makes a difference: Gender similarities and differences in instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26, 389 (2007).
27. Baron, N. See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23, 397-423 (2004). (Pubitemid 39604031)
28. Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Caplan, S. & Yee, N. Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of communication 59, 700-725 (2009).
29. Griffiths, M., Davies, M. & Chappell, D. Online computer gaming: a comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. Journal of adolescence 27, 87-96 (2004). (Pubitemid 38228507)
30. Griffiths, M., Davies, M. & Chappell, D. Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 6, 81-91 (2003). (Pubitemid 36278472)
31. Bruckman, A. Gender swapping on the internet. In Proceedings of the International Networking Conference (San Francisco, 1993).
32. Danet, B. Text as mask: Gender, play and performance on the internet. Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community 129-158 (1998).
33. Hussain, Z. & Griffiths, M. Gender swapping and socializing in cyberspace: An exploratory study. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 11, 47-53 (2008). (Pubitemid 351271571)
34. Bartle, R. Designing Virtual Worlds (New Riders, 2004).
35. Grosman, K. An exploratory study of gender swapping and gender identity in "Second Life". Ph.D. thesis, The Wright Institute (2010).
36. De Nood, D.& Attema, J. Second life: The second life of virtual reality. TheHague, EPN-Electronic Highway Platform 1 (2006).
37. Yee, N. & Bailenson, J. The proteus effect: The effect of transformed selfrepresentation on behavior. Human communication research 33, 271-290 (2007).
38. Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380 (1973).
39. Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J. & Faloutsos, C. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 1 (2007).
40. Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., Kumar, R. & Tomkins, A. Microscopic evolution of social networks. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 462-470 (ACM, 2008).
41. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D. & Kleinberg, J. Signed networks in social media. Proc. 28th CHI (2010).
42. Szell, M., Sinatra, R., Petri, G., Thurner, S. & Latora, V. Understanding mobility in a social petri dish. Scientific Reports 2, 457 (2012).
43. Palchykov,V., Kaski, K.,Kertesz, J., Barabasi, A.-L.&Dunbar, R. Sex differences in intimate relationships. Scientific Reports 2, 370 (2012).
44. Bingol, H. & Basar, O. Asymmetries of Men and Women in Selecting Partner. arXiv: 1211.1035 (2012).