Magnetic poly(1-caprolactone)/irondoped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite substrates for advanced bone tissue engineering

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 10, Issue 80, 2013, Pages

  Gloria, A ^a   Russo, T ^a   D'amora, U ^a   Zeppetelli, S ^a   D'Alessandro, T ^b   Sandri, M ^b   Banobre Lopez M ^c   Pineiro Redondo Y ^d   Uhlarz, M ^e   Tampieri, A ^b   Rivas, J ^c,d   Herrmannsdorfer T ^e   Dediu, V A ^a   Ambrosio, L ^a   De Santis, R ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR CERAMICS   (Italy)

^c INTERNATIONAL IBERIAN NANOTECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^e INSTITUTE OF ION BEAM PHYSICS AND MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone tissue regeneration; Magnetic hydroxyapatite; Nanocomposite; Poly( caprolactone); Scaffold

Indexed keywords

BONE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTACT ANGLE; DRUG DELIVERY; HYDROXYAPATITE; HYPERTHERMIA THERAPY; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOPARTICLES; SATURATION MAGNETIZATION; SCAFFOLDS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STEM CELLS; SUBSTRATES; SUPERPARAMAGNETISM; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; BONE TISSUE REGENERATION; CAPROLACTONE; CELL CONSTRUCTS; COERCIVE FIELD; CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY; CRYSTALLINITIES; HISTORY DEPENDENCE; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; HYPERTHERMIA TREATMENTS; IRON-DOPED; MAGNETIC NANO-PARTICLES; MAGNETIC NANOCOMPOSITES; MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; MECHANOSENSITIVE ION CHANNELS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; SMALL PUNCH TEST; SUPERPARAMAGNETICS; TEMPERATURE SWEEPS; WATER CONTACT ANGLE;

NANOMAGNETICS;

HYDROXYAPATITE; IRON; IRON DOPED HYDROXYAPATITE NANOPARTICLE; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYESTER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOMAGNETISM; BONE; BONE TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTACT ANGLE; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; MAGNETISM; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

BONE AND BONES; CELL ADHESION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; IRON; MAGNETICS; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; METABOLISM; METHODS; NANOCOMPOSITES; POLYESTERS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84873624894     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0833     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. 1993 Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920-926. (doi:10.1126/science. 8493529).
2. Chapekar MS. 2000 Tissue engineering: challenges and opportunities. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 53, 617-620. (doi:10.1002/1097-4636 (2000)53:6, 617::AID-JBM1.3.0.CO;2-C).
3. Cheung HY, Lau KT, Lu TP, Hui D. 2007 A critical review on polymer-based bioengineered materials for scaffold development. Compos. B Eng. 38, 291-300. (doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.014).
4. Gloria A, De Santis R, Ambrosio L. 2010 Polymerbased composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 8, 57-67.
5. Gloria A, Russo T, De Santis R, Ambrosio L. 2009 3D fiber deposition technique to make multifunctional and tailor-made scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 7, 141-152.
6. Burg KJL, Porter S, Kellam JF. 2000 Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21, 2347-2359. (doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00) 00102-2).
7. LeGeros RZ. 2002 Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 395, 81-98. (doi:10.1097/00003086- 200202000-00009).
8. Devin JE, Attawia MA, Laurencin CT. 1996 Threedimensional degradable porous polymer-ceramic matrices for use in bone repair. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 7, 661-669. (doi:10.1163/156856 296X00435).
9. Mathieu LM, Mueller TL, Bourban PE, Pioletti DP, Müller R, Manson JAE. 2006 Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27, 905-916. (doi:10.1016/j. biomaterials.2005. 07.015).
10. Gloria A, Ronca D, Russo T, D'Amora U, Chierchia M, De Santis R, Nicolais L, Ambrosio L. 2011 Technical features and criteria in designing fiber-reinforced composite materials: from the aerospace and aeronautical field to biomedical applications. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 9, 151-163. (doi:10. 5301/JABB.2011.8569).
11. Russo T et al. 2010 Poly(1-caprolactone) reinforced with sol-gel synthesized organic-inorganic hybrid fillers as composite substrates for tissue engineering. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 8, 146-152.
12. Rogel MR, Qiu H, Ameer GA. 2008 The role of nanocomposites in bone regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 4233-4241. (doi:10.1039/B804692A).
13. Tampieri A, Sprio S, Sandri M, Valentini F. 2011 Mimicking natural bio-mineralization processes: a new tool for osteochondral scaffold development. Trends Biotechnol. 29, 526-535. (doi:10.1016/j. tibtech.2011.04.011).
14. Whitaker MJ, Quirk RA, Howdle SM, Shakesheff KM. 2001 Growth factor release from tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 53, 1427-1437. (doi:10.1211/0022357011777963).
15. Glowacki J. 1998 Angiogenesis in fracture repair. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 355, S82-S89. (doi:10. 1097/00003086-199810001-00010).
16. Bock N, Riminucci A, Dionigi C, Russo A, Tampieri A, Landi E, Goranov VA, Marcacci M, Dediu V. 2010 A novel route in bone tissue engineering: magnetic biomimetic scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 6, 786-796. (doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09. 017).
17. Laschke MW et al. 2006 Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng. 12, 2093-2104. (doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.2093).
18. Schieker M, Seitz H, Drosse I, Seitz S, Mutschler W. 2006 Biomaterials as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Eur. J. Trauma 32, 114-124. (doi:10. 1007/s00068-006-6047-8).
19. Patel ZS, Young S, Tabata Y, Jansen JA, Wong ME, Mikos AG. 2008 Dual delivery of an angiogenic and osteogenic growth factor for bone regeneration enhances in a critical size defect model. Bone 43, 931-940. (doi:10.1016/j.bone. 2008.06.019).
20. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J. 2003 Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36, R167-R181. (doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201).
21. Barry SE. 2008 Challenges in the development of magnetic particles for therapeutic applications. Int. J. Hyperthermia 24, 451-466. (doi:10.1080/ 02656730802093679).
22. Dobson J. 2006 Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Drug Dev. Res. 67, 55-60. (doi:10.1002/ddr.20067).
23. Ito A, Shinkai M, Honda H, Kobayashi T. 2005 Medical application of functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 100, 1-11. (doi:10. 1263/jbb.100.1).
24. Muthana M, Scott SD, Farrow N, Morrow F, Murdoch C, Grubb S, Brown N, Dobson J, Lewis CE. 2008 A novel magnetic approach to enhance the efficacy of cell-based gene therapies. Gene Ther. 15, 902-910. (doi:10.1038/gt.2008.57).
25. Markaki AE, Clyne TW. 2004 Magneto-mechanical stimulation of bone growth in a bonded array of ferromagnetic fibres. Biomaterials 25, 4805-4815. (doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.041).
26. Markaki AE, Clyne WT. 2005 Magneto-mechanical actuation of bonded ferromagnetic fibre arrays. Acta Mater. 53, 877-889. (doi:10.1016/j.actamat. 2004.10.037).
27. Mannix RJ, Kumar S, Cassiola F, Montoya-Zavala M, Feinstein E, Prentiss M, Ingber DE. 2008 Nanomagnetic actuation of receptor-mediated signal transduction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 36-40. (doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.418).
28. Hughes S, McBain S, Dobson J, El Haj AJ. 2008 Selective activation of mechanosensitive ion channels using magnetic particles. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 855-863. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1274).
29. Kanczler JM, Sura HS, Magnay J, Attridge K, Green D, Oreffo ROC, Dobson JP, El Haj AJ. 2010 Controlled differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells using magnetic nanoparticle technology. Tissue Eng. 16, 3241-3250. (doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0638).
30. Ito A, Ino K, Hayashida M, Kobayashi T, Matsunuma H, Kagami H, Ueda M, Honda H. 2005 Novel methodology for fabrication of tissue-engineered tubular constructs using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Tissue Eng. 11, 1553-1561. (doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1553).
31. Ito A, Hibino E, Kobayashi C, Terasaki H, Kagami H, Ueda M, Kobayashi T, Honda H. 2005 Construction and delivery of tissue-engineered human retinal pigment epithelial cell sheets, using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Tissue Eng. 11, 489-496. (doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.489).
32. Pislaru SV et al. 2006 Magnetic forces enable rapid endothelialization of synthetic vascular grafts. Circulation 114, 1314-1318. (doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001446).
33. Dobson J, Cartmell SH, Keramane A, El Haj AJ. 2006 Principles and design of a novel magnetic force mechanical conditioning bioreactor for tissue engineering, stem cell conditioning, and dynamic in vitro screening. IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci. 5, 173-177. (doi:10.1109/TNB.2006.880823).
34. Dobson J. 2008 Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 139-143. (doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.39).
35. Mack JJ, Cox BN, Sudre O, Corrin AA, dos Santos SL, Lucato CMa, Andrew JS. 2009 Achieving nutrient pumping and strain stimulus by magnetic actuation of tubular scaffolds. Smart Mater. Struct. 18, 104 025- 104 040. (doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/10/104025).
36. Perea H, Aigner J, Hopfner U, Wintermantel E. 2006 Direct magnetic tubular cell seeding: a novel approach for vascular tissue engineering. Cells Tissues Organs 183, 156-165. (doi:10.1159/000095989).
37. Shimizu K, Ito A, Arinobe M, Murase Y, Iwata Y, Narita Y, Kagami H, Ueda M, Honda H. 2007 Effective cell-seeding technique using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force onto decellularized blood vessels for vascular tissue engineering. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 103, 472-478. (doi:10.1263/jbb.103.472).
38. Tampieri A et al. 2012 Intrinsic magnetism and hyperthermia in bioactive Fe-doped hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 8, 843-851. (doi:10.1016/j.actbio. 2011.09.032).
39. De Santis R et al. 2011 A basic approach toward the development of nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds for advanced bone tissue engineering. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 122, 3599-3605. (doi:10.1002/app.34771).
40. Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R. 2008 Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4, 26-49. (doi:10.1002/smll. 200700595).
41. Singh N, Jenkins GJS, Asadi R, Doak SH. 2010 Potential toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION). Nano Rev. 1, 53-58. (doi:10. 3402/nano.v1i0.5358).
42. Berry CC, Curtis ASG. 2003 Functionalisation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36, 198-206. (doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/203).
43. Goegan P, Johnson G, Vincent R. 1995 Effects of serum protein and colloid on the AlamarBlue assay in cell cultures. Toxicol. In Vitro 9, 257-266. (doi:10.1016/0887-2333(95)00004-R).
44. Nociari MM, Shalev A, Benias P, Russo C. 1998 A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. Methods 213, 157-167. (doi:10.1016/S0022-1759 (98)00028-3).
45. Dunne NJ, Leonard D, Daly C, Buchanan FJ, Orr JF. 2006 Validation of the small punch test as a technique for characterizing the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 220, 11-21. (doi:10.1243/ 095441105X68980).
46. Candela GA, Haines RA. 1979 A method for determining the region of superparamagnetism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 868-870. (doi:10.1063/1.90705).
47. Brown Jr WR. 1963 Thermal fluctuations of a singledomain particle. Phys. Rev. 130, 1677-1686. (doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.1677).
48. Yoshida T, Kikuchi M, Kyama Y, Takakuda K. 2010 Osteogenic activity of MG63 cells on bone-like hydroxyapatite/collagen nanocomposite sponges. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4, 1263-1272. (doi:10.1007/s10856-009-3938-3).