Enzyme recycling in a simultaneous and separate saccharification and fermentation of corn stover: A comparison between the effect of polymeric micelles of surfactants and polypeptides

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 132, Issue , 2013, Pages 202-209

  Eckard, Anahita Dehkhoda ^a   Muthukumarappan, Kasiviswanathan ^a   Gibbons, William ^b  

^a South Dakota State University   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass; Cellulase; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Ethanol; Pretreatment

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CASEIN; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MICELLES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RECYCLING; SACCHARIFICATION; SEPARATION;

CELLULASE; CORN STOVER; ENZYME RECYCLING; ETHANOL YIELD; NOVEL ENZYMES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL (PEG); POLYMERIC MICELLE; PRE-TREATMENT; TWEEN-20;

POLYMERS;

ALCOHOL; AMPHOPHILE; CASEIN; CELLULASE; GLUCOSE; MACROGOL; POLYMER; POLYMERIC MICELLE; POLYPEPTIDE; POLYSORBATE 20; SURFACTANT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELLULOSE; CROP RESIDUE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; PEPTIDE; RECYCLING; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORN STOVER; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME RECYCLING; FERMENTATION; MAIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECYCLING; SACCHARIFICATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84873620742     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ahl P.L., et al. Enhancement of the in ûiûo circulation lifetime of l-α line liposomes: importance of liposomal aggregation versus complement opsonization. Biophys. Acta 1997, 1329:370-382.
2. Alkasrawi M., Eriksson T., Borjesson J., Wingren A., Galbe M., Tjerneld F., Zacchi G. The effect of Tween-20 on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of softwood to ethanol. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2003, 33:71-78.
3. Ballstros, J., Olivia, M., Carascoa, J., 1998. Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Steam-Exploded Poplar Biomass to Ethanol. Instituto de Energis Renovables-CIEMAT, Avda. vol. 70-72,pp. 369-379.
4. Borjesson J., Engqvist M., Slipos B., Tjerneld F. Effect of polyethylene glycol on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulose enzymes to pretreated lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41:186-195.
5. Dehkhoda A., Brandberg T., Taherzadeh M.J. Comparison of vacuum and high pressure wood hydrolyzate for ethanol production by repeated fed- Batch using flocculating Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Bioresources 2009, 4:309-320.
6. Eckard A.D., Muthukumarappan K., Gibbons W. Pretreatment of extruded corn stover with polyethylene glycol to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis: optimization, kinetics, and mechanism of action. Bioenergy Res. 2011, 5:424-438.
7. Eckard A.D., Muthukumarappan K., Gibbons W. Enhanced bioethanol production from pretreated corn stover via multi-positive effect of casein micelles. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.100.
8. Eckard, A.D., Muthukumarappan, K., Gibbons, W., 2012b. Evaluation of the Role of Polymerized Micelles on Yield of Saccharification. Chemical Changes of Biomass and Cellulase Structure and Adsorption. Bioenergy Res., submitted for publication.
9. Eckard A.D., Muthukumarappan K., Gibbons W. Modeling of pretreatment condition of extrusion pretreated prairie cordgrass and corn stover with polyoxyethylen (20) sorbitan monolaurate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167:377-393.
10. Eckard A.D., Muthukumarappan K., Gibbons W. Analysis of casein biopolymers adsorption to lignocellulosic biomass as a potential cellulase stabilizer. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 10.1155/2012/745181.
11. Erriksson T., Karlsson J., Tjerland F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 3:353-364.
12. Hayashi Y., Talukder M.M.R., Wu J., Takeyama T., Kawanishi T., Shimizu N.J. Increased activity of Chromobacterium viscosum lipase in AOT reverse micelles in the presence of short chain methoxypolyethylene glycol. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76:844-850.
13. Karunanithy C., Muthukumarappan K. Optimization of corn stover and extruder parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis using response surface methodology. Biol. Eng. 2011, 3(2):73-95.
14. Kumar R., Wyman C.E. Effect of additive on the digestibility of corn stover solids following pretreatment by leading technologies. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 102:1544-1557.
15. Li J., Li Shizhong., Fan Chenyu., Yan Zhepei. The mechanism of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 effect on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Colloids Surf. B 2011, 89:203-210.
16. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., Van Zyl W.H., Pretorious I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Micobiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66:506-577.
17. Marella C., Salunke P., Metzger L.E. Optimization of spiral wound microfiltration process production of micellar casein concentrate. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94(E-Suppl. 1).
18. Mooney C., Manfield S., Touchy M., Saddler J. The effect of the initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood. Bioresour. Technol. 1998, 64:113-119.
19. 2 surfaces. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:3305-3318.
20. Paria S., Khilar K.C. A review on experimental studies of surfactant adsorption at the hydrophilic solid-water interface. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 110:75-95.
21. Palonen H., Tjerlneld F., Zacchi G., Tenkannen M. Adsorption of Trichoderma ressei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domain on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 107:65-72.
22. Qing Q., Yang B., Wyman C.E. Impact of surfactants on pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 10:5941-5951.
23. Qiu Z., Aita G.M., Walker M.S. Effect of ionic liquid pretreatment on the chemical composition, structure and enzymatic hydrolysis of energy cane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 117:251-256.
24. Seo D.J., Fujito H., Sakoda A. Effects of a non-ionic surfactant, Tween 20, on adsorption/desorption of saccharification enzymes onto/from lignocelluloses and saccharification rate. Adsorption 2011, 17:813-822.
25. Sinha J., Day P.K., Panda T. Aqueous two-phase: the system of choice for extractive fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54:476-486.
26. Talunder M.M., Takayama T., Hayashi Y., Wu J.C., Kawanishi T., Shimizu N., Ogino C. Improvement of enzyme activity and stability by adding of low molecular weight polyethylene glycol to sodium bis (2-ethyl-l-hexyl) sulfosuccinate/isooctane reverse micelles. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 110:101-111.
27. Tejas P., Gunjikar S.B., Joshi J.B. Shear deactivation of cellulase, exoglucanase, endoglucanase, and â-glucosidase in a mechanically agitated reactor. Biotechnol. Progr. 2001, 17:1166-1168.
28. Tu M., Chandra R.P., Sadller J.N. Recycling cellulase during the hydrolysis of steam exploded and ethanol pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnol. Progr. 2007, 1130-1137.
29. Tu M., Zhang X., Piace M., McFarlance P., Saddler N. Effect of surfactants on separate hydrolysis fermentation and simultaneous saccharification fermentation of pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnol. Progr. 2009, 25:1122-1129.
30. Vert M., Domurado D. Poly(ethylene glycol): protein-repulsive or albumin-compatible?. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2000, 11:1307-1317.
31. Viparelli P., Alfani F., Cantarella M. Models for enzyme superactivity in aqueous solutions of surfactants. Biochem. J. 1999, 344:765-773.
32. Wu J., Ju L.K. Enhancing enzymatic saccharification of waste newsprint by surfactant addition. Biotechnol. Prog. 1998, 14:649-652.
33. Xue Y., Jameel H., Park Sunkyu. Strategies to recycle enzyme and their impact on hydrolysis for bioethanol production. Bioresources 2012, 7:602-615.
34. Xiang, J., Fan, J.B.N., Liang, C.Y., 2006. Interaction of cellulose with sodium dodecyl sulfate at critical micelle concentration level. Colloids Surf. B 49, 175-180.
35. Yamada Y., Kuboi R., Komasawa I. Increased activity of Chromobacterium viscosum lipase in aerosol OT reverse micelles in the presence of nonionic surfactants. Biotechnol. Progr. 1993, 9:468-472.
36. Yang B., Wyman C.E. BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94:611-617.