Pretreatment of Extruded Corn Stover with Polyethylene Glycol to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis: Optimization, Kinetics, and Mechanism of Action

Bioenergy Research

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 424-438

  Eckard, Anahita Dehkhoda ^a   Muthukumarappan, Kasiviswanathan ^a   Gibbons, William ^b  

^a South Dakota State University   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Cellulase; Lignin; Lignocellulose; Non ionic surfactant; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

CELLULASE; COMBUSTION ANALYSIS; CORN STOVER; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; ENZYME ADSORPTION; ENZYME SOLUBILIZATION; EXTRUSION TECHNIQUES; GLUCOSE YIELDS; HIGH POTENTIAL; HOT WATER EXTRACTION; INCUBATION TIME; LIGNOCELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; MECHANISM OF ACTION; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; PARAMETER EVALUATION; PEG CONCENTRATION; POTENTIAL MECHANISM; PRE-TREATMENT; QUADRATIC POLYNOMIAL; REACTION VELOCITIES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SCREW SPEED; SUGAR YIELD; SURFACTANT TREATMENT; TREATMENT TEMPERATURE; XYLOSE YIELDS;

ADSORPTION; BIOETHANOL; CELLULOSE; COMBUSTION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ETHANOL; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; GLUCOSE; LIGNIN; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EXTRUSION;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84860575051     PISSN: 19391234     EISSN: 19391242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-011-9162-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Galbe M, Zacchi G (2002) A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microb Biotechnol 59: 618-628.
2. Wyman CE (1999) Biomass ethanol; technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu Rev Energy Environ 24: 1899-226.
3. Ferreira SMP, Duarte AP, Queiroz JA, Domingues FC (2009) Influence of buffer systems on Trichoderma ressei Rut C-30 morphology and cellulase production. Electronic Journal of Biotechnol 12: 1-9.
4. Ma AZ, Hu Q, Qu YB, Bai ZH, Liu WF, Zhuang GQ (2008) The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decrease with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzym and Microb Technol 42: 543-547.
5. Holtzapple M, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C (1990) Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng 36: 275-287.
6. Xiao ZZ, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2004) Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113-16: 1115-1126.
7. Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE (2010) Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresource Technol 101: 9624-9630.
8. Kim TH, Lee YY, Sunwoo C, Kim JS (2006) Pretreatment of corn stover by low liquid ammonia recycle percolation process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 133: 41-57.
9. Zhu YM, Kim TH, Lee YY, Chen RG, Elander RT (2006) Enzymatic production of xylooligosaccharides from corn stover and corn cobs treated with aqueous ammonia. Applied Biochem and Biotechnol 130: 586-598.
10. Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M (2011) Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb Technol 48: 54-60.
11. Aymard C, Belarbi A (2000) Kinetics of thermal deactivation of enzymes: a simple three parameters phenomenological model can describe the decay of enzyme activity, irrespectively of the mechanism. Enzyme Microb Technol 27: 612-618.
12. Kim MH, Lee SB, Ryu DDY (1982) Surface deactivation of cellulose and its prevention. Enzyme Microb Technol 4: 99-103.
13. Castanon M, Wilke CR (1981) Effect of the surfactant Tween 80 on enzymatic hydrolysis of newspaper. Biotechnol Bioeng 23: 1365-1372.
14. Parke JW, Takahata Y, Kajuchi T, Akehata T (1992) Effects of non-ionic surfactant on enzymatic hydrolysis of used newspaper. Biotechnol Bioeng 39: 117-120.
15. Yang SWZ, Quian JQY, Zhou YG, Xia XH (2009) Simple approach for efficient encapsulation of enzyme in silica matrix with retained bioactivity. Analytical Chem 7: 3478-3484.
16. Pavani m, Basil DK (2010) Immobilization of Cellulase and Hemicellulases on Porous Glass Beads. ASTM 7: 10 pages.
17. Yang B, Wyman CE (2006) BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrate. Wiley Interscience 94: 611-617.
18. Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R (2008) Non-ionic surfactants and non-catalytic protein treatment on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated creeping wild ryegrass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 146: 231-248.
19. Borjesson J, Engqvist M, Slipos B, Tjerneld F (2007) Effect of polyethylene glycol on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulose enzymes to pretreated lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 41: 186-195.
20. Steele BR, Nghiem SJ, Stowers M (2005) Enzyme recovery and recycling following hydrolysis of ammonia fiber explosion-treated corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 901: 121-124.
21. Qi B, Chen X, Su Y, Wan Y (2011) Enzyme adsorption and recycling during hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose. Bioresource Technol 102: 2881-2889.
22. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2007) Enzyme based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. Bioresources 4: 707-738.
23. Erriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerland F (2002) Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 3: 353-364.
24. Kumar R, Wyman CE (2008) Effect of additive on the digestibility of corn stover solids following pretreatment by leading technologies. Biotechnol Bioeng 102: 1544-1557.
25. Kaar WK, Holtzapple MT (1998) Benefits from Tween during enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol & Bieng 59: 419-427.
26. Badley RA, Carruthers L, Phillips MC (1977) Hydrophobic free energy and the denaturation of proteins. Biochem Biophys Acta 495: 110-113.
27. Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2006) Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresource Technol 97: 583-591.
28. Lee SH, Inoue S, Teramato Yand Endo T (2010) Enzymatic saccharification of woody biomass micro/nano fibrillated by continues extrusion process II. Effect of hot-compressed water treatment. Bioresource Technol 101: 9645-9649.
29. Lee SH, Inoue S, Teramato Yand Endo T (2009) Enzymatic saccharification of woody biomass micro/nanofibrillated by continoius process I-effect of additives with cellulose affinity. Bioresource Technol 100: 275-279.
30. Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K (2011) Optimization of alkali soaking and extrusion pretreatment of prairie cordgrass for maximum sugar recovery by enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J 54: 71-82.
31. Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K (2011) Optimization of alkali, big blue stem particle size and extruder parameters for maximum enzymatic sugar recovery using response surface methodology. Bioresources 6: 762-790.
32. Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K (2011) Optimization of alkali, switchgrass, and extruder parameters for maximum sugar recovery. Chemical Eng Technol 34: 1413-1426.
33. Eckard AD, Muthukumarappan K, Gibbons WR (2011) Optimization of Tween 20 and SDS pretreatment condition for enzymatic hydrolysis of extruded corn. ASABE Paper no. 1110677. ASABE, Louisville.
34. Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K (2011) Optimization of corn stover and extruder parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis using response surface methodology. Biol Eng 3 (2) Accepted.
35. Kaya F, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW (1995) Influence of surfactants on the enzymatic hydrolysis of xylan and cellulose. Tappi J 78: 149-157.
36. Qi B, Chen X, Wan Y (2010) Pretreatment of wheat straw by non-ionic surfactant assisted dilute acid for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production. Bioresource Technol 101: 4875-4883.
37. Box GEP, Hunter JS (1957) Multi-factor experimental-designs for exploring response surfaces. Ann Math Stat 28: 195-241.
38. Obeng DP, Morrell S, Napier-Munn TJ (2005) Application of central composite rotatable design to modelling the effect of some operating variables on the performance of the three-product cyclone. Int J Miner Process 76: 181-192.
39. Pedersen M, Johansen SK, Meyerl AS (2011) Low temperature lignocellulose pretreatment: effects and interactions of pretreatment pH are critical for maximizing enzymatic monosaccharide yields from wheat straw. Biotechnol for biofuels 4: 1-11.
40. Penner MH (2001) Expression and measurement of enzyme activity. Current protocols in food analytical chem C1. 1. 1-C1. 1. 4.
41. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59: 257-268.
42. Liu H, Zhu JY (2010) Eliminating inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by lignosulfonate in unwashed sulfite-pretreated aspen using metal salts. Bioresource Technol 101: 9120-9127.
43. Karlstrom G (1985) A new model for upper and lower critical solution temperature in poly ethylene oxide solutions. J Phys Chem 89: 4962-4964.
44. Saeki SN, Kuwahara M, Nakata MK (1976) Upper and lower critical solution temperature in poly ethylene glycol solutions. Polymer 17: 685-189.
45. Huyan JK, Sung BK, Chang JK (2007) The effect of nonionic surfactants on the pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of recycled newspaper. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 12: 147-151.
46. Chauve M, Maaths H, Delphine H, Casanave D, Monot F, Ferreira NL (2010) Comparative kinetic analysis of two fungal β-glucosidase. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 1-8.
47. Holtzapple MT, Caram SH, Humphrey AE (1984) A comparison of two empirical models for the enzymic hydrolysis of pretreated poplar wood. Biotechnol Bioeng 26: 936-941.
48. Cristenson JB, Borejsson J, Bruun MH, Tjerneld F, Jorgensen H (2006) Use of surfactant active additives in enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose. Enzyme and Microbial Technol 40: 888-895.