The effect of Tween-20 on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of softwood to ethanol

Enzyme and Microbial Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 71-78

  Alkasrawi, Malek ^a   Eriksson, Torny ^a   Börjesson, Johan ^a   Wingren, Anders ^a   Galbe, Mats ^a   Tjerneld, Folke ^a   Zacchi, Guido ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Enzyme recovery; Ethanol production; Softwood; SSF; Tween 20

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COSTS; ENZYME KINETICS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; SOFTWOODS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

LIQUID FRACTION;

SACCHARIFICATION;

ALCOHOL; NONIONIC SURFACTANT; POLYSORBATE 20;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME BINDING; FERMENTATION; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; NONHUMAN; SACCHARIFICATION; WOOD;

EID: 0037666266     PISSN: 01410229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0229(03)00087-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. von Sivers M., Zacchi G. Ethanol from lignocellulosics: a review of the economy. Bioresour. Technol. 56:1996;131-140.
2. Stenberg K., Bollok M., Reczey K., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Effect of substrate and cellulase concentration on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated softwood for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68(2):2000;204-210.
3. Tengborg C., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Influence of enzyme loading and physical parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Biotechnol. Progr. 17:2001;110-117.
4. Stenberg K., Tengborg C., Galbe M., Zacchi G., Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Recycling of process streams in ethanol production from softwood based on enzymic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70-72:1998;697-708.
5. Larsson M., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Recirculation of process water in the production of ethanol from softwood. Bioresour. Technol. 60(2):1997;143-151.
6. Alkasrawi M., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Recirculation of process streams in fuel ethanol production from softwood based on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 98-100:2002;849-861.
7. Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis current and futuristic scenarios. Technical report, NREL/TP-580-26157; (1999).
8. Gregg D.J., Boussaid A., Saddler J.N. Techno-economic evaluation of a generic wood-to-ethanol process: effect of increased cellulose yields and enzyme recycle. Bioresour. Technol. 63:1998;7-12.
9. Helle S.S., Duff S.J.B., Cooper D.G. Effect of surfactants on cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42(5):1993;611-617.
10. Castanon M., Wilke C.R. Effects of the surfactant Tween 80 on enzymatic hydrolysis of newspaper. Biotechnol. Bioeng. XXIII:1981;1365-1372.
11. Ooshima H., Sakata M., Harano Y. Enhancement of enzymatic-hydrolysis of cellulose by surfactant. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28:1986;1727-1734.
12. Kurakake M., Ooshima H., Kato J., Harano Y. Pretreatment of begasse by nonionic surfactant for the enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 49:1994;247-251.
13. Kaar W.E., Holtzapple M. Benefits from Tween during enzymic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 59:1998;419-427.
14. Eriksson T., Börjesson J., Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31(3):2002;353-364.
15. Hägglund E. Chemistry of wood. New York: Academic Press; 1951. p. 324-32.
16. Berghem L., Pettersson G. The mechanism of enzymatic cellulose degradation isolation and some properties of a b-glucosidase from Trichoderma viride. Eur. J. Biochem. 46:1974;295-305.
17. Mandels M., Andreotti R., Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotech. Bioeng. Symp. 6:1976;21-33.
18. 2-impregnated mixed softwoods for ethanol production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 71:1998;299-308.
19. Stenberg K., Galbe M., Zacchi G. The influence of lactic acid formation on the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of softwood to ethanol. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26:2000;71-79.
20. Kim M.H., Lee S.B., Ryu D.D.Y. Surface deactivation of cellulase and its prevention. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 4:1982;99-103.
21. Park J.W., Takahata Y., Kajiuchi T., Akehata T. Effects of nonionic surfactant on enzymatic-hydrolysis of used newspaper. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 39:1992;117-120.
22. Ballesteros I., Olivia J.M., Carrasco J., Cabanas A., Navarro A.A., Ballesteros M. Effect of surfactant and zeolites on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-exploded poplar biomass to ethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70-72:1998;369-381.
23. Lee W.G., Lee J.S., Lee J.P., Shin C.S., Kim M.S., Park S.C. Effect of surfactants on ethanol fermentation using glucose and cellulosic hydrolyzates. Biotechnol. Lett. 18(3):1996;299-304.
24. Hinman N.D., Schell D.J., Riley C.J., Bergeron P.W., Walter P.J. Preliminary estimate of the cost of ethanol production for SSF technology. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34/35:1992;639-649.