Differentiable kernels in generalized matrix learning vector quantization

Proceedings - 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2012

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 132-137

  Kastner, Marika ^a   Nebel, David ^a   Riedel, Martin ^a   Biehl, Michael ^b   Villmann, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES MITTWEIDA   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SPACE; GENERALIZED MATRIX; KERNEL BASED CLASSIFIERS; LEARNING VECTOR QUANTIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

VECTOR QUANTIZATION;

EID: 84873600155     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMLA.2012.231     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. N. Aronszajn. Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of theAmerican Mathematical Society, 68:337-404, 1950.
2. A. Backhaus, F. Bollenbeck, and U. Seiffert. High-throughput qualitycontrol of coffee varieties and blends by artificial neural networksand hyperspectral imaging. In Proceedings of the 1st InternationalCongress on Cocoa, Coffee and Tea, CoCoTea 2011, page acceptedfor publication, 2011.
3. A. Backhaus, F. Bollenbeck, and U. Seiffert. Robust classificationof the nutrition state in crop plants by hyperspectral imaging andartificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Workshopon Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in RemoteSensing WHISPERS 2011, page 9. IEEE Press, 2011.
4. J. Bezdek. A convergence theorem for the fuzyy ISODATA clusteringalgorithm. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence, 2(1):1-8, 1980.
5. J. Bezdek. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms.Plenum, New York, 1981.
6. M. Biehl, K. Bunte, F.-M. Schleif, P. Schneider, and T. Villmann. Largemargin discriminative visualization by matrix relevance learning. InH. Abbass, D. Essam, and R. Sarker, editors, Proc. of the InternationalJoint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Brisbane, pages 1873-1880, Los Alamitos, 2012. IEEE Computer Society Press.
7. M. Biehl, B. Hammer, F.-M. Schleif, P. Schneider, and T. . Villmann.Stationarity of matrix relevance learning vector quantization. MachineLearning Reports, 3(MLR-01-2009):1-17, 2009. ISSN:1865-3960,http://www. uni-leipzig.de/~compint/mlr/mlr012009:pdf:
8. K. Bunte, B. Hammer, A. Wismüller, and M. Biehl. Adaptivelocal dissimilarity measures for discriminative dimension reduction oflabeled data. Neurocomputing, 73:1074-1092, 2010.
9. K. Bunte, P. Schneider, B. Hammer, F.-M. S. T. Villmann, andM. Biehl. Limited rank matrix learning, discriminative dimensionreduction and visualization. Neural Networks, 26(1):159-173, 2012.
10. K. Crammer, R. Gilad-Bachrach, A.Navot, and A.Tishby. Margin analysisof the LVQ algorithm. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, and K. Obermayer,eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing (Proc. NIPS 2002),volume 15, pages 462-469, Cambridge, MA, 2003. MIT Press.
11. B. Frénay and M. Verleysen. Parameter-free kernel in extremelearning for non-linear support vector regression. Neurocomputing,74(16): 2526-2531, 2011.
12. H. Grahn and P. Geladi, editors. Techniques and Applications ofHyperspectral Image Analysis. Wiley, 2007.
13. B. Hammer and T. Villmann. Generalized relevance learning vectorquantization. Neural Networks, 15(8-9):1059-1068, 2002.
14. S. Haykin. Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan,New York, 1994.
15. M. Kästner, B. Hammer, M. Biehl, and T. Villmann. Functionalrelevance learning in generalized learning vector quantization. Neurocomputing,90(9):85-95, 2012.
16. T. Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps, volume 30 of Springer Series inInformation Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995. (SecondExtended Edition 1997).
17. T. M. Martinetz, S. G. Berkovich, and K. J. Schulten. 'Neuralgas'network for vector quantization and its application to time-seriesprediction. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 4(4):558-569, 1993.
18. J. Mercer. Functions of positive and negative type and their connectionwith the theory of integral equations. Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal Society, London, A, 209:415-446, 1909.
19. C. Micchelli, Y. Xu, and H. Zhang. Universal kernels. Journal ofMachine Learning Research, 7:26051-2667, 2006.
20. E. Mwebaze, P. Schneider, F.-M. Schleif, J. Aduwo, J. Quinn, S. Haase,T. Villmann, and M. Biehl. Divergence based classification in learningvector quantization. Neurocomputing, 74(9):1429-1435, 2011.
21. E. Pekalska and R. Duin. The Dissimilarity Representation for PatternRecognition: Foundations and Applications. World Scientific, 2006.
22. J. Platt. Fast Training of Support Vector Machines Using SequentialMinimal Optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999.
23. A. Qin and P. Suganthan. A novel kernel prototype-based learningalgorithm. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference onPattern Recognition (ICPR'04), volume 4, pages 621-624, 2004.
24. A. K. Qin and P. N. Suganthan. Kernel neural gas algorithms withapplication to cluster analysis. In ICPR (4), pages 617-620, 2004.
25. A. Sato and K. Yamada. Generalized learning vector quantization. InD. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, and M. E. Hasselmo, editors, Advancesin Neural Information Processing Systems 8. Proceedings of the 1995Conference, pages 423-9. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996.
26. F.-M. Schleif, T. Villmann, B. Hammer, and P. Schneider. Efficientkernelized prototype based classification. International Journal ofNeural Systems, 21(6):443-457, 2011.
27. B. Schölkopf and A. Smola. Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, 2002.
28. P. Schneider, K. Bunte, H. Stiekema, B. Hammer, T. Villmann,and M. Biehl. Regularization in matrix relevance learning. IEEETransactions on Neural Networks, 21(5):831-840, 2010.
29. P. Schneider, B. Hammer, and M. Biehl. Adaptive relevance matricesin learning vector quantization. Neural Computation, 21:3532-3561,2009.
30. U. Seiffert, F. Bollenbeck, H.-P. Mock, and A. Matros. Clustering ofcrop phenotypes by means of hyperspectral signatures using artificialneural networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop onHyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in RemoteSensing WHISPERS 2010, pages 31-34. IEEE Press, 2010.
31. I. Steinwart. On the influence of the kernel on the consistency ofsupport vector machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research,2:67-93, 2001.
32. T. Villmann and S. Haase. Divergence based vector quantization.Neural Computation, 23(5):1343-1392, 2011.
33. T. Villmann and S. Haase. A note on gradient based learningin vector quantization using differentiable kernels for Hilbert andBanach spaces. Machine Learning Reports, 6(MLR-02-2012):1-29, 2012. ISSN:1865-3960, http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~fschleif/mlr/mlr-02-2012.pdf.
34. T. Villmann, S. Haase, and M. Kästner. Gradient based learning invector quantization using differentiable kernels. In P. Estevecz, editor,Proc. of the 9th Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps, Santiago de Chile,LNCS, page submitted, Berlin, 2012. Springer.